Verbs of failure and feigning: their role in the identification of grammatical meaning

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/ril.590201
Keywords: lexical semantics, grammatical meaning, encyclopedic meaning, classes of verbal predicates

Abstract

The study of meaning encoded in lexical items poses the problem of determining which aspects of meaning are active structural components in syntax and which ones represent encyclopedic information not conveyed through grammatical units. This article examines the properties of two under-researched classes of verbs, namely, verbs of feigning (such as fintar) and verbs of failure (e.g. marrar) from the perspective of the distinction between grammatical meaning and encyclopedic knowledge. The study compares different ways of establishing this distinction and their implications for the semantic analysis of the said verbs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACQUAVIVA, Paolo y Laure GARDELLE (2023): «Pluralia tantum and singularia tantum», en Peter Ackema, Sabrina Bendjaballah, Eulàlia Bonet y Antonio Fábregas (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, Oxford, Wiley, pp. 2043-2071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119693604.morphcom065

AISSEN, Judith (2003): «Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy», Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), pp. 435-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024109008573

ALLAN, Keith y Kate BURRIDGE (2006): Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881

ARIZA, Manuel (1989): «La preposición a de objecto: teorías y panorama», Lexis, 13, pp. 203-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18800/lexis.198902.002

BELLO, Andrés (1847): Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos, Tenerife, Aula de Cultura de Tenerife. [Editada por Ramón Trujillo, 1981]

BICKEL, Balthasar (1996): Aspect, mood, and time in Belhare: Studies in the semantics-pragmatics interface of a Himalayan language, Tesis doctoral, Zurich, Universidad de Zurich.

BORER, Hagit (2013): Taking form, Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001

BOSSONG, Georg (1985): Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den Neuiranisdchen Sprachen, Tubinga, Gunter Narr Verlag.

BROWN, Susan W., James PUSTEJOVSKY, Annie ZAENEN y Matha PALMER (2016): «Verb meaning in context: Integrating verbnet and GL predicative structures», en Proceedings of the LREC 2016 Workshop: ISA-12, Potoroz (Eslovenia), pp. 56-61.

CARRASCO, Ángeles (2006a): «Estar a punto de + infinitivo», en Luis García Fernández (dir.), Diccionario de perífrasis verbales, Madrid, Gredos, pp. 146-152.

CARRASCO, Ángeles (2006b): «Estar + gerundio», en Luis García Fernández (dir.), Diccionario de perífrasis verbales, Madrid, Gredos, pp. 136-142.

CHRISTOPHE, Véronique (1998): Les émotions: tour d’horizon des principales théories, Villeneuve-d’Ascq, Presses universitaires du Septentrion. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.septentrion.50970

COSERIU, Eugenio (1978): Gramática, semántica, universales, Madrid, Gredos.

COSERIU, Eugenio (1992): Competencia lingüística: elementos de la teoría del hablar, Madrid, Gredos.

DELBECQUE, Nicole (1999): «Two transitive construction frames in Spanish: the prepositional and the non-prepositional accusative», en Leon De Stadler y Christoph Eyrich (eds.), Issues in Cognitive Linguistics, Berlín, De Gruyter, pp. 407-424.

DIK, Simon (1987): «Copula auxiliarization: how and why», en Martin Harris y Paolo Ramat (eds.), Historical development of auxiliaries, Berlín, Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 53-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856910.53

DOWTY, David R. (1977): «Toward a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English “Imperfective” progressive», Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, pp. 45-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351936

EVANS, Barrie (1996): «Event variables and Davidson’s program in semantics», UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, pp. 1-10. En línea: https://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/96papers/evans.pdf [20/9/2023].

FÁBREGAS, Antonio y Raquel GONZÁLEZ RODRÍGUEZ (2020): «On inhibited eventualities», Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 38, pp. 729-773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09461-y

FODOR, Jerry (1998): Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong, Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198236360.001.0001

GARCÍA FERNÁNDEZ, Luis (2006): « + gerundio», en Luis García Fernández (dir.), Diccionario de perífrasis verbales, Madrid, Gredos, pp. 136-142.

GARRIDO MEDINA, Joaquín (1994): Lógica y lingüística, Madrid, Síntesis.

HALE, Kenneth y Samuel J. KEYSER (1993): «On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations», en Kenneth Hale y Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, pp. 53-110.

IM, Seohyun y James PUSTEJOVSKY (2010): «Annotating lexically entailed subevents for textual inference tasks», Proceedings of FLAIRS, 23, pp. 204-209. En Twenty-third international FLAIRS conference. En línea: https://cdn.aaai.org/ocs/1383/1383-7761-1-PB.pdf [20/9/2023].

JACKENDOFF, Ray (1990): Semantic structures, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.

JACKENDOFF, Ray (2002): Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution, Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001

JACKENDOFF, Ray (2010): Meaning and the lexicon, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

LACA, Brenda (1995): «Sobre el uso del acusativo preposicional en español», en Carmen Pensado (ed.), El complemento directo preposicional, Madrid, Visor, pp. 61-91.

LANDMANN, Fred (1992): «The progressive», Natural language semantics, 1(1), pp. 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342615

LEVIN, Beth (1993): English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation, Chicago / Londres, University of Chicago Press.

LEVIN, Beth y Malka RAPPAPORT-HOVAV (1995): Unaccusativity, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.

LEVIN, Beth y Malka RAPPAPORT-HOVAV (2005): Argument Realization, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479

LIEBER, Rochelle (2004): Morphology and lexical semantics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486296

LIEBER, Rochelle (2006): «The category of roots and the roots of categories», Morphology, 16, pp. 247-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-006-9106-2

LIEBER, Rochelle (2009): «A lexical semantic approach to compounding», en Rochelle Lieber y Pavol Stekauer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 78-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0005

LIEBER, Rochelle (2016): English nouns: The ecology of nominalization, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676288

LYONS, John (1977): Semantics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

MARANTZ, Alec (1995): Cat as a phrasal idiom. Ms. inédito, MIT.

MATEU, Jaume (2002): Argument Structure. Relational Construal at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Tesis doctoral, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

MOENS, Marc y Mark STEEDMAN (1988): «Temporal ontology and temporal reference», Computational Linguistics, 14, pp. 15-28.

PIÑÓN, Christopher (1997): «Achievements in an event semantics», Semantics and Linguistic Theory [número especial: Aaron Lawson (ed.), Proceedings of SALT 7], pp. 273-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v7i0.2781

POLANČEC, Jurica (2021): «Two-phase verbs: a crosslinguistic look at an actional class», Sprachtypologie and Universalienforschung, 74, pp. 467-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2021-1042

POTTS, Christopher (2007): «The expressive dimension», Theoretical Linguistics, 33, pp. 165-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.011

PULVERMÜLLER, Friedemann (2005): «Brain mechanisms linking language and action», Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, pp. 576-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1706

PUSTEJOVSKY, James (1995): The Generative Lexicon, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3225.001.0001

PUSTEJOVSKY, James (2013): «Type theory and lexical decomposition», en James Pustejovsky, Pierrette Bouillon, Hitoshi Isahara, Kyoko Kanzaki y Chungmin Lee (eds.), Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 9-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5189-7_2

RAMCHAND, Gillian C. (2008): Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319

RAMCHAND, Gillian (2018): Situations and syntactic structures, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10911.001.0001

RIEMER, Nick (2017): «Word meanings», in John R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Word, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 305-319.

RODRÍGUEZ MONDOÑEDO, Miguel (2007): The syntax of objects: agree and Differential Object Marking. Tesis doctoral, Storrs, University of Connecticut.

TAYLOR, John R. (2003): Linguistic Categorization, Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199266647.001.0001

VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1989): La ciencia del texto: un enfoque interdisciplinario, Barcelona, Paidós.

VENDLER, Zeno (1957): «Verbs and times», Philosophical review, 56, pp. 143-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371

VLACH, Frank (1981): «The semantics of the progressive», en Philipp Tedeschi y Annie Zaenen (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 14, Tense and Aspect, Nueva York, Academic Press, pp. 271-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373112_015

VLACH, Frank (1993): «Temporal adverbials, tenses and the perfect», Linguistics and philosophy, 16, pp. 231-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985970

Published
18-12-2024
How to Cite
Fábregas, A. (2024). Verbs of failure and feigning: their role in the identification of grammatical meaning. Journal of Linguistic Research, 27, 41–65. https://doi.org/10.6018/ril.590201
Issue
Section
Articles