Learning by Doing? Partners Audit Experience and the Quality of Audit Services
Learning by Doing? La experiencia en auditoría del socio auditor y la calidad de los servicios de auditoría
Supporting Agencies
- We thank the participants at the XI Workshop on Empirical Research in Financial Accounting and, in particular Araceli Mora as the discussant of a former version of this paper for helpful comments and suggestions.
Abstract
Despite evidence suggesting that specialised knowledge should be more relevant than generic knowledge to explain different levels of audit quality across individual auditors, no study to date has addressed the respective impacts of the industry-specific and the generic audit experience of audit partners on the quality of audit services. Our study investigates this issue in the Spanish audit market. We proxy audit quality by discretionary accruals and by the opinion of the audit report, and differentiate among client-specific experience, industry-specific experience and generic audit experience of individual auditors. As expected, our results show significantly higher audit quality when the client is audited by a partner with stronger industry-specific audit experience. Furthermore, we observe that neither client-specific experience nor generic audit experience of audit partners are significant determinants of the quality of audit services provided by these auditors. These results may have some interesting implications for audit firms. Therefore, whereas some prior studies on the related issue of industry specialization point out that specialised knowledge is more relevant than generic knowledge to explain the quality of audit services, our findings suggest that specialised knowledge is, in fact, the only type of knowledge that seems to matter.
Downloads
-
Abstract1215
-
PDF959
-
HTML135
References
Ackerman, P. L. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 3−27.
Anthony, J. H., & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2-3), 203--227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(92)90018-W
Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B.W. (2003). Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 611--639. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.611
Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo J. J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x
Bedard, J. (2012). Discussion of "Audit partner specialization and audit fees: Some evidence from Sweden". Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01153.x
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Fuss, H. F. (1995). Temporal changes in bankruptcy-related reporting. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 14(2), 133--143.
Carcello, J.V. & Nagy, A.L. (2004). Client size, auditor specialization and fraudulent financial reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(5), pp. 651-668.
Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 653--676. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.3.653
Chen, C. Y., Lin, C. J., & Lin, Y. C. (2008). Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality? Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 415--445. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.2.5
Chi, H. Y., & Chin, C. L. (2011). Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 201--229. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50004
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg, (Ed). Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (pp. 7--75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chi, W., & Huang, H. (2005). Discretionary accruals, audit-firm tenure and audit-partner tenure: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 1(1), 65--92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1815-5669(10)70003-5
Chi, W., Myers, L. A., Omer, T. C., & Xie, H. (2017). The effects of audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience on audit quality and on perceptions of audit quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(1), 361-391. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11142-016-9376-9
Chin, C. L., & Chi, H. Y. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729--765. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.3.4
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393553
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183--199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G. & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193--225. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248303
Ellis, H. (1965 New York The Transfer of Learning. New York: Macmillan Company.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
Fargher, N., Lee, H., & Mande, V. (2008). The effect of audit partner tenure on client managers' accounting discretion. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(2), 161--186. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810839857
Ferguson, A., Francis, J. R., & Stokes, D. J. (2003). The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing. The Accounting Review, 78(2), 429-448. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.2.429
Fisher, M. L., & Ittner, C. D. (1999). The impact of product variety on automobile assembly operations: Empirical evidence and simulation analysis. Management Science, 45(6), 771--786. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.6.771
Francis, J. R., Maydew, E. L., & Sparks, H. C. (1999). The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(2), 17--34. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.1999.18.2.17
Francis, J. R., & Wang, D. (2008). The joint effect of investor protection and big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 157-191. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.1.6
Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. (2002). The relation between auditors' fees for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 71--105. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.71
Frensch, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (pp. 157--188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Garcia-Blandon, J., & Argiles-Bosch, J. M. (2017). The interaction effects of firm and partner tenure on audit quality. Accounting and Business Research, 47(7), 810-830. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2017.1289073
Garcia-Blandon, J., & Argiles‐Bosch, J. M. (2018). Audit partner industry specialization and audit quality: Evidence from Spain. International Journal of Auditing, 22(1), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12107
Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (1988). Overview. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr, (Eds.), The Nature of Expertise (pp. xv--xxviii). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goodwin, J., & Wu, D. (2014). Is the effect of industry expertise on audit pricing an office-level or a partner-level phenomenon? Review of Accounting Studies, 19(4), 1532-1578. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11142-014-9285-8
Gul, F. A., Fung, S. Y. K., & Jaggi, B. (2009). Earnings quality: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and auditors' industry expertise. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 47(3), 265--287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.03.001
Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993-2023. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50536
Healy, P. (1996). Discussion of a market-based evaluation of discretionary accrual models. Journal of Accounting Research, 34(supplement), 107--115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2491428
Ittonen, K., Johnstone, K., & Myllymäki, E. R. (2015). Audit partner public-client specialisation and client abnormal accruals. European Accounting Review, 24(3), 607-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.906315
Johnson, V. E., Khurana, I. K., & Reynolds, J. K. (2002). Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 637--660. https://doi.org/10.1506/LLTH-JXQV-8CEW-8MXD
Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigation. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193--228. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2491047
Knechel, W. R. (2000). Behavioral research in auditing and its impact on audit education. Issues in Accounting Education, 15(4), 695-712. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2000.15.4.695
Knechel, W. R., Vanstraelen, A., & Zerni, M. (2015). Does the identity of engagement partners matter? An analysis of audit partner reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(4), 1443-1478. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12113
Kwon, S. Y., Lim, C. Y., & Tan, P. M. S. (2007). Legal systems and earnings quality: The role of auditor industry specialization. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(2), 25-55. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2007.26.2.25
Lapre, M. A., Mukherjee, A. S., & Van Wassenhove, L.N. (2000). Behind the learning curve: Linking learning activities to waste reduction. Management Science, 46(5), 597--611. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.5.597.12049
Libby, R., & Luft, J. (1993). Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(5), 425-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90040-D
Lys, T., & Watts, R. L. (1994). Lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(supplement), 65--93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2491440
Manry, D. L., Mock, T. J., & Turner, J. L. (2008). Does increased audit partner tenure reduce audit quality? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23(4), 553--572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0802300406
Mautz, R. K. & Sharaf, H. A. (1961). The Philosophy of Auditing. American Accounting Association.
Myers, J. N., Myers, L. A., & Omer, T. C. (2003). Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review, 78(3), 779--799. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.779
Mora, A., & Sabater, A. (2008). Evidence of income-decreasing earnings management before labor negotiations within firms. Investigaciones Economicas, 32, 201-230. https://www.redalyc.org/html/173/17332203/
Nagy, A. L. (2014). Audit partner specialization and audit fees. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(6), 513--526. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-11-2013-0966
Numan, W., & Willekens, M. (2012). An empirical test of spatial competition in the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1), 450--465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.10.002
Patel, V. L., & Groen, G. J. (1991). The general and specific nature of medical expertise: A critical look. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a General Theory of Expertise (pp. 93-125). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Reid, C. D., & Youngman, J. F. (2017). New audit partner identification rules may offer opportunities and benefits. Business Horizons, 60(4), 507-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.03.008
Schilling, M. A., Vidal, P., Ployhart, R. E., & Marangoni, A. (2003). Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Science, 49(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.1.39.12750
Shu, S. (2000). Auditor resignations: clientele effects and legal liability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(2), 173--205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00019-7
Sloan, R. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? The Accounting Review, 71(3), 289--315. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248290
Sonu, C. H., Choi, A., Lee, J., & Ha, W. (2016). Audit partner's length of audit experience and audit quality: evidence from Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2016.1242428
Wang, X., Wang, Y., Yu, L., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Engagement audit partner experience and audit quality. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 3(3), 230-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2015.1055776
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice Hall International.
Ye, P., Carson, E., & Simnett, R. (2011). Threats to auditor independence: The impact of relationship and economic bonds. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(1), 121--148. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2011.30.1.121
Zerni, M. (2012). Audit partner specialization and audit fees: Some evidence from Sweden. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 312--340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01098.x
Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(supplement), 59--82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2490859
The publications in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) and ASEPUC conserve the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published manuscripts, and favour and allow their reuse under the licence of use indicated in point 2.
2. The manuscripts are published in the electronic edition of the journal under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. It allows to copy, distribute and include the article in a collective work (for example, an anthology), as long as there is no commercial purpose, the article is not altered or modified and the original work is properly cited. This journal is free of charge for the Open Access publication. ASEPUC and EDITUM finance the productiona and publication costs of the manuscripts.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are permitted and encouraged to electronically disseminate the published version of their works, as it favors their circulation and dissemination and thus a possible increase in their citation and reach among the academic community.
