Principios básicos de diseño didáctico Agile que permiten la agencia estudiantil: una revisión sistemática

Celia Torres-Blasco; Adolfina Pérez-Garcias

doi:10.6018/educatio.636941

Authors

Celia Torres-Blasco Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0758-366X
Adolfina Pérez-Garcias Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1863-375X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.636941

Keywords: agile framework, student agency, educational technology, higher education, systematic review

Abstract

In the face of an uncertain, volatile, and complex future, educational approaches are proposed that highlight student agency as a fundamental pillar. In this context, Agile didactic strategies enriched with technology could be beneficial, enabling student agency. Finding no studies linking both concepts, a scoping review was conducted under the PRISMA protocol. The positive results obtained motivated this systematic review, which aims to identify the Agile principles related to student agency. The databases used in the search included Scopus, Web of Science, Dialnet, EBSCO, and ERIC. After applying eligibility criteria, 25 documents were selected and coded with ATLAS.ti according to a system of categories and codes designed ad hoc. The results were favorable and identified Agile fundamentals that enable student agency, focusing on self-managed learning, role changes where the teacher guides the students, collaboration, continuous improvement cycles, and the use of technology. Limitations include phases conducted by a single person and the exclusion of grey literature. As future work, it is considered necessary to design and validate a model with Agile didactic design elements that mobilize student agency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Views/Downloads

Abstract
34
PDF (Español (España))
16

Author Biography

Adolfina Pérez-Garcias, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain

Tenured Professor in the Department of Applied Pedagogy and Educational Psychology at the University of the Balearic Islands (UIB).

Researcher with the GITED Group at UIB in the field of Educational Technology.

Research and teaching areas: integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) in teaching and learning processes; design of educational resources; teaching innovation with ICT; design and management of hybrid learning spaces enhanced by technology; knowledge management; didactic strategies, and educational communication with ICT.

She has participated in competitive research projects, served on the scientific committee of numerous international conferences, supervised various doctoral theses, and has publications in well-regarded scientific journals and conferences.

References

Bacea, I. M. y Ciupe, A. y Meza, S. N. (2017). Interactive Kanban: Blending Digital and Physical Resources for Collaborative Project Based Learning. In IEEE (Ed.), 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 210–211). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.68

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280

Beck, K. y Beedle, M. y van Bennekum, A. y Cockburn, A. y Cunningham, W. y Fowler, M. y Grenning, J. y Highsmith, J. y Hunt, A. y Jeffries, R. y Kern, J. y Marick, B. y Martin, R. C. y Mellor, S. y Schwaber, K. y Sutherland, J. y Thomas, D. (2001). Manifiesto por el Desarrollo Ágil de Software. http://agilemanifesto.org/iso/es/manifesto.html

Boti, E. y Damasiotis, V. y Fitsilis, P. (2021). Skills Development Through Agile Capstone Projects. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 1523, pp. 97–112). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93135-3_7

Cubric, M. (2013). An agile method for teaching agile in business schools. International Journal of Management Education, 11(3), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2013.10.001

Delhij, A. y van Solingen, R. y Wijnands, W. (2020). The eduScrum Guide: the rules of the game. eduScrum Team. https://eduscrum.com.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/The_eduScrum-guide-English_2.0_update_21-12-2019.pdf

Fernandes, S. y Dinis-Carvalho, J. y Ferreira-Oliveira, A. T. (2021). Improving the performance of student teams in project-based learning with scrum. Education Sciences, 11(8), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080444

Fombona, J. y Listopadzka, E. (2024). Estrategias educativas y de liderazgo para afrontar el nuevo escenario europeo VUCA. Educatio Siglo XXI, 42(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.6018/EDUCATIO.555851

Guadelupe, S. R. y Freitas, D. P. y De Carvalho, P. V. R. y Jatobá, A. (2021). Monitoring student performance through an agile project-based assessment strategy for distance higher education. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.286739

Hout, M. van y Gootjes, G. (2015). SCREAM! An integrated approach for multidisciplinary design teams in higher education. In L. and L. A. and C. GomezChova (Ed.), EDULEARN15: 7th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (Issue March, pp. 2157–2167). IATED. https://library.iated.org/view/VANHOUT2015SCR

Jääskelä, P. y Poikkeus, A.-M. y Häkkinen, P. y Vasalampi, K. y Rasku-Puttonen, H. y Tolvanen, A. (2020). Students’ agency profiles in relation to student-perceived teaching practices in university courses. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101604–101618. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101604

Jääskelä, P. y Tolvanen, A. y Marín, V. I. y Poikkeus, A.-M. (2023). Assessment of students’ agency in Finnish and Spanish university courses: Analysis of measurement invariance. International Journal of Educational Research, 118, 102140–102153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102140

Jahnke, I. y Norberg, A. (2013). Digital Didactics: Scaffolding a New Normality of Learning. In Open Education 2030: contributions to the JRC-IPTS Call for Vision Papers. Part III: Higher Education (pp. 129–134). -. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-84469

Kamat, V. (2012). Agile manifesto in higher education. 2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Technology for Education, 231–232. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2012.49

Krehbiel, T. C. y Salzarulo, P. A. y Cosmah, M. L. y Forren, J. y Gannod, G. y Havelka, D. y Hulshult, A. R. y Merhout, J. (2017). Agile Manifesto for Teaching and Learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 17(2), 90–111. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1157450.pdf

López-Alcarria, A. y Olivares-Vicente, A. y Poza-Vilches, F. (2019). Revisión Sistemática sobre el uso de Metodologías Ágiles para fomentar las Competencias Clave en la Educación para el Desarrollo Sostenible. In Asociación Interuniversitaria de Investigación Pedagógica (AIDIPE) (Ed.), XIX Congreso Internacional de Investigación Educativa (Vol. 2, pp. 202–210). https://0-dialnet-unirioja-es.llull.uib.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7603519

Marín, V. I. y De Benito, B. y Darder, A. (2020). Technology-Enhanced Learning for Student Agency in Higher Education: a Systematic Literature Review. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 45, 15–49. https://doi.org/10.55612/S-5002-045-001

Moschella, M. (2020). Agile Project Design: a systematic literature review on Agile Education applied to design. Form@re - Open Journal per La Formazione in Rete, 20(2), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.13128/FORM-8453

Neumann, M. y Baumann, L. (2021). Agile Methods in Higher Education: Adapting and Using eduScrum with Real World Projects. 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2021-Octob. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637344

Noguera, I. y Guerrero-Roldán, A. E. y Masó, R. (2018). Collaborative agile learning in online environments: Strategies for improving team regulation and project management. Computers and Education, 116, 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.008

OECD. (2019). Learning Compass 2030. www.oecd.org/education/2030-project

Page, M. J. y McKenzie, J. E. y Bossuyt, P. M. y Boutron, I. y Hoffmann, T. C. y Mulrow, C. D. y Shamseer, L. y Tetzlaff, J. M. y Akl, E. A. y Brennan, S. E. y Chou, R. y Glanville, J. y Grimshaw, J. M. y Hróbjartsson, A. y Lalu, M. M. y Li, T. y Loder, E. W. y Mayo-Wilson, E. y McDonald, S. y … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372(71), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N71

Parsons, D. y Thorn, R. y Inkila, M. y MacCallum, K. (2018). Using Trello to Support Agile and Lean Learning with Scrum and Kanban in Teacher Professional Development. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 720–724. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2018.8615399

Rasulova, M. y Ottoson, K. (2022). The Impact of Learner Agency and Self-Regulated Learning in EFL Classes. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(2), 712–717. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i2-44

Royle, K. y Nikolic, J. (2016). A modern mixture, Agency, Capability, Technology and ‘Scrum’: Agile Work Practices for Learning and Teaching in Schools. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 3(3), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3501.0161

Saltz, J. y Heckman, R. (2020). Exploring Which Agile Principles Students Internalize When Using a Kanban Process Methodology. Journal of Information Systems Education, 31(1), 51–60. http://jise.org/Volume31/n1/JISEv31n1p51.html

Salza, P. y Musmarra, P. y Ferrucci, F. (2019). Agile Methodologies in Education: A Review. In Agile and Lean Concepts for Teaching and Learning (pp. 25–45). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2751-3_2

Santos-Caamaño, F.-J. y Vázquez-Cancelo, M.-J. y Rodríguez-Machado, E.-R. (2021). Tecnologías digitales y ecologías de aprendizaje: desafíos y oportunidades. Educatio Siglo XXI, 39(2), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.6018/EDUCATIO.466091

Stewart, J. C. y DeCusatis, C. S. y Kidder, K. y Massi, J. R. y Anne, K. M. (2009). Evaluating Agile Principles in Active and Cooperative Learning. Student-Faculty Research Day, CSIS, 1–8. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.510.3904&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Su, Y.-H. (2011). The constitution of agency in developing lifelong learning ability: the ‘being’ mode. Higher Education, 62(4), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9395-6

Thomas, J. y Graziosi, S. y Brunton, J. y Ghouze, Z. y O’Driscoll, P. y Bond, M. Koryakina, A. (2022). EPPI-Reviewer: advanced software for systematic reviews, maps and evidence synthesis. EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=2914

Autora y Autora (2023). Nombre artículo. Revista.

Tur, G. y Ramírez-Mera, U. y Marín, V. I. (2022). Aprendizaje autorregulado y Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje en la formación inicial docente: percepciones del alumnado y propuestas de herramientas y recursos. Revista Complutense de Educación, 33(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.71002

UNESCO. (2017). Educación para los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000252423

Vila Grau, J. L. y Capuz Rizo, S. (2021). La extensión de la Agilidad al ámbito docente a través de Scrum y Eduscrum. 25th International Congress on Project Management and Engineering (ICPME 2021). https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/177321

Yamnitsky, E. (2022). Application of agile to distance-learning professional doctorate programmes: A conceptual model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(2), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.2019604

Zavala Berbena, M. A. y Figueiras, S. C. (2014). Fenomenología de agencia y educación. Notas para el análisis del concepto de agencia humana y sus proyecciones en el ámbito educativo. Magister, 26(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0212-6796(14)70024-6

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Basic Agile instructional design principles enabling student agency: A systematic review