Rethinking the Resources of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Elementary Students in a Preservice Teacher Education Program
Abstract
Many teachers enter the profession with a deficit-perspective of their students and their communities, particularly those working with students from low-socioeconomic backgrounds and/or students who are emergent bilinguals. Yet the majority of the students in our schools today come from backgrounds that often have different sets of values and different ways of viewing the world. The result is that, too often, educators adopt a deficit perspective. The goal of this study was to disrupt deficit thinking by introducing preservice teachers to the notion that students arrive in our classrooms with existing funds of knowledge (Moll, Amanti, Neff, & Gonzalez, 1992). Through class activities and assignments, preservice teachers were introduced to the concept of funds of knowledge. This study examines the impact of introducing an asset-based perspective early in candidates’ preparation and asks what shifts occur in preservice teachers’ perspectives of their students and the resources those students bring when engaged in purposeful examination of their own and their prospective students’ cultural funds of knowledge.
Downloads
References
Aguirre, J. M., Turner, E. E., Bartell, T. G., Kalinec-Craig, C., Foote, M. Q., Roth McDuffie, A., & Drake, C. (2013). Making connections in practice: How prospective elementary teachers connect to children’s mathematical thinking and community funds of knowledge in mathematics instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 178-192.
Alim, H. S., & Paris, D. (2017). What is culturally sustaining pedagogies and why does it matter? In D. Paris and H. S. Alim (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 1-21). Teachers College Press.
Banks, J., Cochran-Smith, M., Moll, L., Richert, A., Zeichner, K., LePage, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Duffy, H., & McDonald, M. (2005). Teaching diverse learners. In Darling-Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (Eds.) Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 232-274). Jossey-Bass.
Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. In J. Mangieri and C. C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives (pp. 161-186). Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Bender, J. (2016, March 30). Funds of Knowledge Theoretical Model [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCzoAmZHlHE.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
De la Peña, M., & Robinson, C. (2015). The last stop on Market Street. G.P. Putnam's Sons Books for Young Readers. Penguin Random House.
Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. The New Press.
Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd Ed.) (pp. 500-515). Sage.
Emdin, C. (2016). For White folks who teach in the hood... and the rest of y'all too: Reality pedagogy and urban education. Beacon Press.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1985). Pitfalls of experience in teacher preparation. Teachers College Record, 87(1), 53-65.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching, Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.) Teachers College.
Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge. Routledge.
Grant, C. A., & Agosto, V. (2008). Teacher Capacity and Social Justice in Teacher Education, in M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Enduring Questions and Changing Contexts (3rd Ed., pp. 175-200). Routledge.
Grossman, P. (2005). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 425–476). Erlbaum.
Grossman, P. L., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 1-29.
Hebard, H. (2016). Finding possibility in pitfalls: The role of permeable methods pedagogy in preservice teacher learning. Teachers College Record, 118(7), 1–42.
Karabon, A. (2021). Examining how early childhood preservice teacher funds of knowledge shapes pedagogical decision making. Teaching and teacher education, 106, 1-10.
Lortie, D., & Schoolteacher, A. (1975). A sociological study. Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 360-363.
Love, B. L. (2019). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into practice, 31(2), 132-141.
Parker, L., Reid, C., & Ghans, T. (2017). Challenging deficit default and educators’ biases in urban schools. Race and Pedagogy Journal: Teaching and Learning for Justice, 2(3), 1.
Sleeter, C. (2016). Wrestling with problematics of whiteness in teacher education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(8), 1065-1068.
Szabo, S. M., Scott, M. M., & Yellin, P. G. (2002). Integration: A strategy to help PSTs make the connection between theory to practice. Action in Teacher Education, 24(3), 1-9.
Valencia, R. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking. Falmer Press.
Valencia, R. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2008). Case Study research: Design and methods (4th ed). Sage.
Copyright (c) 2022 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Original work publishes in this journal is subject to the following terms:
1. Murcia University Press (the publishing house) holds the copyright of the publishes work, and favours and allows their reutilization under the use license stated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2015
2. Work is published in the electronic edition under a license (Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 España (legal text). They can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly presented, as long as: i) authorship and original publication source is acknowledged (journal, publishing house and URL of the work); ii) are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this use license is stated.
3. Conditions for self-archive. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate electronically the pre-pint (before review) and/or post-print (accepted for publication) versions of their work before their publication since that favours earlier circulation and dissemination resulting in an increased chance for the authors to be cited and for the work to reach a bigger share of the academic community. Colour: RoMEO: green.
