“It improves our writing enthusiasm”: Exploring multimodal resources for teaching contemporary college English writing in China

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.535051
Keywords: College English, second language learning, interactive, multimodal, writing, instruction

Abstract

As Chinese college students work toward writing proficiency in English, a tension between direct, teacher-led instruction that focuses on proper usage conflicts with changes in literacy practices enabled by technology. As a visiting scholar to an American university, Author 1 was compelled to use strategies she saw in Author 2’s first year writing seminar. In this classroom research project, a mixed methods design is used by Author 1 to report on three changes to her teaching practices in college English courses – the use of multimedia presentation software, social network communication, and the Pigaiwang writing assistance tool. By comparing survey results, interview themes, and test scores between control and experimental sections, results demonstrate that students in the experimental group had generally more favorable ratings of the college English experience. Based on these outcomes in a limited study, implications for future changes in college English instruction in China are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Author 2 et al. Blinded for peer review.

Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Fifth edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Doman, E., & Webb, M. (2017). The flipped experience for Chinese university students studying English as a foreign language. TESOL Journal, 8(1), 102–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.264

Gao, L. X., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Teacher learning in difficult times: Examining foreign language teachers’ cognitions about online teaching to tide over COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2396. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.549653

Gil, J., Lin, H., & Campbell, G. (2020). Designing and implementing a tandem language learning (TLL) program for learners of Chinese and English using the social media app QQ. In D. Kenley (Ed.), Teaching about Asia in a Time of Pandemic (pp. 141–150). Association for Asian Studies. https://cup.columbia.edu/search-results?keyword=9781952636202

Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Publishing.

Han, J., & Yin, H. (2016). College English curriculum reform in mainland China: Contexts, contents and changes. Asian Education Studies, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v1i1.9

Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Li, G. (2019). Impact of the integrated feedback based on AWE on students’ writing revision. Foreign Language Education, 40(4), 261–291.

Li, X., & Zhong, L. (2017). Empirical study on automated essay scoring (AES) in college English writing teaching—Based on the pigai system. Research in Teaching, 2017(1), 57–61. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-JIYJ201701012.htm

Lu, L. (2016). A study of the second writing process based on an automated essay evaluation tool. Foreign Language World, 2, 88–96.

New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

The Higher Education Department of the Ministry of Education. (2007). College English curriculum requirements. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (n.d.). ICT in education. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/themes/ict-education

Wang, S. (2017). Changing concepts and deepening reform to promote the new development of foreign language teaching in universities. China University Teaching, 2, 59–64.

Wang, S., & Wang, H. (2011). On the state of college English teaching in China and its future development. Foreign Languages in China, 5(4–11), 17.

Yang, X., & Dai, Y. (2015). An empirical study on college English autonomous writing teaching model based on www.pigai.org. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 162(2), 17–23. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-WYDH201502003.htm

Yao, Y. (2017). The construction of English multimodal teaching mode in the new media era. Northeast Normal University Press.

Yu, Z., & Mu, X. (2012). Metacognitive strategy training in QQ group based English reading learning community. Modern Educational Technology, 22(2), 85–90.

Zhang, H., Dou, W., & Huang, R. (2007). A study of QQ platform-based synchronous online oral English instruction. Computer-Assisted Foreign Language Education, 6, 42–26.

Zhou, J. (2017). Analysis of questionnaire data: Crack six kinds of analysis ideas of SPSS. Publishing House of Electronics Industry.

Published
27-10-2022
How to Cite
Xiaoyan, S., & Hicks, T. (2022). “It improves our writing enthusiasm”: Exploring multimodal resources for teaching contemporary college English writing in China. Educatio Siglo XXI, 40(3), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.535051
Issue
Section
Artículos