Parâmetros psicométricos do International Fitness Scale – versão brasileira via on-line e impresso
Resumo
Com os avanços tecnológicos as pesquisas on-line tornaram-se cada vez mais comuns, o que torna a avaliação da aptidão física on-line viável. Objetivamos avaliar a validade de construto e testar a confiabilidade do International Fitness Scale – versão brasileira (IFIS – BRA), no formato on-line, comparada à versão impressa. Participaram do estudo adolescentes (n = 294), na faixa etária entre 12 e 17 anos, de ambos os sexos. Os adolescentes responderam à versão impressa e on-line do IFIS – BRA em dois momentos, com o intervalo de duas semanas entre as aplicações. A confiabilidade, de todos os itens, foi classificada como “substancial”. Foi encontrada uma concordância média, de todos os itens, classificada como “perfeita” (69,7%), e “perfeitamente aceitável” (97,1%). Podemos afirmar que a versão on-line do IFIS – BRA, atingiu níveis adequados de desempenho psicométrico, assim assegurando a utilização, por profissionais da área da saúde e pesquisadores, como meio alterativo confiável para a avaliação da aptidão física de adolescentes brasileiros.
Downloads
Referências
Álvarez-Gallardo, I. C., Soriano-Maldonado, A., Segura-Jiménez, V., Carbonell-Baeza, A., Estévez-López, F., McVeigh, J. G., Delgado-Fernández, M., & Ortega, F. B. (2016). International Fitness Scale (IFIS): Construct Validity and Reliability in Women With Fibromyalgia: The al-Ándalus Project. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(3), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.416
American College of Sports Medicine. (2017). ACSM’s Health-Related Physical Fitness Assessment (5th ed.).
Belisario, J. S. M., Huckvale, K., Saje, A., Porcnik, A., Morrison, C. P., & Car, J. (2015). Comparison of self administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2
Bicen, A., Uzunboylu, H., & Burgul, N. S. (2020). Evaluation of Participants’ Opinions on Online Physical Fitness Training. Revista de Psicología Del Deporte (Journal of Sport Psychology), 29(4), 25–32.
Braekman, E., Berete, F., Charafeddine, R. agreement of the self-administered questionnaire of the B. H. I. S. P. versus web-based mode, Demarest, S., Drieskens, S., Gisle, L., Molenberghs, G., Tafforeau, J., Van der Heyden, J., & Van Hal, G. (2018). Measurement agreement of the self-administered questionnaire of the Belgian Health Interview Survey: Paper-and-pencil versus web-based mode. PLoS One, 13(5), e0197434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197434
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2th ed.). The Guilford Press.
Buchanan, T., Ali, T., Heffernan, T. M., Ling, J., Parrott, A. C., Rodgers, J., & Scholey, A. B. (2005). Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: The case of the prospective memory questionnaire. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206409
Campos, J. A. D. B., Zucoloto, M. L., Bonafé, F. S. S., Jordani, P. C., & Maroco, J. (2011). Reliability and validity of self-reported burnout in college students: A cross randomized comparison of paper-and-pencil vs. online administration. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1875–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.011
Chirivella, E. C. (2016). La especialidad profesional en Psicología del Deporte. Revista de Psicología Aplicada Al Deporte y El Ejercicio Físico, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5093/rpadef2016a2
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. In Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-10517-X
Damásio, B. F. (2013). Contribuições da Análise Fatorial Confirmatória Multigrupo (AFCMG) na avaliação de invariância de instrumentos psicométricos. Psico-USF, 18(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712013000200005
Donovan, M. A., Drasgow, F., & Probst, T. M. (2000). Does computerizing paper-and-pencil job attitude scales make a difference? New IRT analyses offer insight. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.305
Ebert, J. F., Huibers, L., Christensen, B., & Christensen, M. B. (2018). Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(1), e24. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8353
Español-Moya, M. N., & Ramírez-Vélez, R. (2014). Validación del cuestionario International Fitness Scale (IFIS) en sujetos colombianos de entre 18 y 30 años de edad. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 88(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1135-57272014000200009
Falconi, C. A., Zanetti, M. C., Santos, T. de A., Dias, H. M., Brandao, M. R. F., & Neves, A. N. (2019). Relação entre antropometria, gordura corporal e autoconceito de adolescentes do sexo feminino. Cuadernos de Psicología Del Deporte, 19(2), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.6018/cpd.348001
Finegan, J. E., & Allen, N. J. (1994). Computerized and written questionnaires: Are they equivalent? Computers in Human Behavior, 10(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(94)90042-6
Gelder, M. M. H. J. V., Bretveld, R. W., & Roeleveld, N. (2010). Web-based Questionnaires: The Future in Epidemiology? American Journal of Epidemiology, 172(11), 1292–1298. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq291
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (4th ed.).
González-Ruiz, S. L., Gómez-Gallego, I., Pastrana-Brincones, J. L., & Hernández-Mendo, A. (2015). Algoritmos de clasificación y redes neuronales en la observación automatizada de registros. Cuadernos de Psicología Del Deporte, 15(1), 31–40.
González-Ruiz, S. L., Hernández-Mendo, A., & Pastrana Brincones, J. L. (2010). Herramienta software para la evaluación psicosocial de deportistas y entornos deportivos. Lecturas: EF y Deportes. Revista Digital, 15(144), 1–15.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman editora.
Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., Rück, C., Furmark, T., Carlbring, P., Lindefors, N., & Andersson, G. (2010). Internet administration of self-report measures commonly used in research on social anxiety disorder: A psychometric evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 736–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.010
Hirao, N., Koizumi, K., Ikeda, H., & Ohira, H. (2021). Reliability of Online Surveys in Investigating Perceptions and Impressions of Faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733405
Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., Rosseel, Y., Miller, P., Quick, C., Garnier-Villarreal, M., Selig, J., Boulton, A., & Preacher, K. (2021). Package ‘semTools.’
Joubert, T., & Kriek, H. J. (2009). Psychometric comparison of paper-and-pencil and online personality assessments in a selection setting. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 35(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v35i1.727
King, W. C., & Miles, E. W. (1995). A quasi-experimental assessment of the effect of computerizing noncognitive paper-and-pencil measurements: A test of measurement equivalence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(6), 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.643
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
Lopes, V. P., & Sá, C. (2021). The use of physical activity trackers devices and physical activity levels in adolescents and adults. Cuadernos de Psicología Del Deporte, 21(1), 258–270.
Marôco, J. (2010). Análise De Equações Estruturais - Fundamentos Teóricos, Software & Aplicações.
Marôco, J. (2014). Análise de Equações Estruturais: Fundamentos Teóricos, Software & Aplicações. In Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber.
Mead, A. D., & Drasgow, F. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.449
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2014). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.).
Ortega, A. M. S., & Montero, F. J. O. (2021). Relación entre resiliencia y rendimiento en deportistas. Revisión sistemática. Revista de Psicología Aplicada Al Deporte y Al Ejercicio Físico, 6(2), 1–11.
Ortega, Ruiz, J. R., España-Romero, V., Vicente-Rodriguez, G., Martínez-Gómez, D., Manios, Y., Béghin, L., Molnar, D., Widhalm, K., Moreno, L. A., Sjöström, M., & Castillo, M. J. (2011). The International Fitness Scale (IFIS): usefulness of self-reported fitness in youth. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(3), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr039
Pans, M., Úbeda-Colomer, J., & Devís-Devís, J. (2021). Validación de la Athletic Identity Measurement Scale en Estudiantes Universitarios con Discapacidad y Diferencias según Variables Sociodemográficas. Revista de Psicología Del Deporte (Journal of Sport Psychology), 30(2), 1–10.
Pereira, D. A., Carvas Junior, N., Correia Júnior, J. L., & Freitas-Dias, R. (2019). Transcultural adaptation: translation and validation of content of the brazilian version of the the international fitness scale instrument. Adolescência & Saúde, 16(3), 80–92.
Pereira, D. A., Carvas Junior, N., Correia Júnior, J. L., & Freitas-Dias, R. (2021). IFIS - versão brasileira (p. 1). http://profith.ugr.es/pages/investigacion/recursos/ifis/ifisversaiobrasileira
Pereira, D. A., Correia Júnior, J. L., Carvas Junior, N., & Freitas-Dias, R. de. (2020). Reliability of questionnaire The International Fitness Scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Einstein (São Paulo), 18, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020rw5232
Polit, D. F. (2014). Getting serious about test–retest reliability: a critique of retest research and some recommendations. Quality of Life Research, 23(6), 1713–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0632-9
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Ramírez-Vélez, R., Cruz-Salazar, S. M., Martínez, M., Cadore, E. L., Alonso-Martinez, A. M., Correa-Bautista, J. E., Izquierdo, M., Ortega, F. B., & García-Hermoso, A. (2017). Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the International Fitness Scale (IFIS) in Colombian children and adolescents aged 9-17.9 years: the FUPRECOL study. PeerJ, 5. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3351
Reigal, R. E., Pastrana-Brincones, J. L., González-Ruiz, S. L., Hernández-Mendo, A., Morillo-Baro, J. P., & Morales-Sánchez, V. (2020). Use of Data Mining to Determine Usage Patterns of an Online Evaluation Platform During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2579. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588843
Rosseel, Y. (2014). The lavaan tutorial. Department of Data Analysis: Ghent University.
Souza, A. C., Alexandre, N. M. C., & Guirardello, E. de B. (2017). Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 26(3), 649–659. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022
Stawarz, K., Preist, C., Tallon, D., Wiles, N., & Coyle, D. (2018). User Experience of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Apps for Depression: An Analysis of App Functionality and User Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(6), e10120. https://doi.org/10.2196/10120
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics, 6th (ed.) Boston, MA. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
World Health Organization. (2020). WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: at a glance.
Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(1), 3.
Zeleke, A. A., Worku, A. G., Demissie, A., Otto-Sobotka, F., Wilken, M., Lipprandt, M., Tilahun, B., & Röhrig, R. (2019). Evaluation of Electronic and Paper-Pen Data Capturing Tools for Data Quality in a Public Health Survey in a Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, Ethiopia: Randomized Controlled Crossover Health Care Information Technology Evaluation. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 7(2), e10995. https://doi.org/10.2196/10995
Zhang, F., Huang, L., & Peng, L. (2020). The Degree of Influence of Daily Physical Activity on Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetics. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01292
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
