Validation of an Observation Instrument to Assess Students’ Motor Competence

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/cpd.706101
Keywords: motor competence, validation, reliability, observational methodology

Supporting Agencies

  • This study is part of a project funded by the Ministry of Science, Research and Universities (PID2024-156274NB-C22 by the MICIU /AEI/10.13039/501100011033 / FEDER, UE).

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a shortened version of the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3), one of the most widely used assessments of gross motor competence worldwide, and to examine its validity, inter-rater reliability, and the reliability of the observation instrument. Data were collected from 217 Spanish primary school children. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the validity of the proposed reduction in the number of TGMD-3 skills. In addition, the intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess inter-rater

reliability and internal consistency, while Generalizability Theory was applied to evaluate the reliability of both the observers and the observation instrument. These complementary analyses provided evidence of the measurement quality of the proposed short version. The shortened six-skill version of the TGMD-3 demonstrated adequate factorial validity, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and high-quality observational data, supported by an observation instrument with exhaustive and mutually exclusive categories. These findings provide researchers and education professionals with a valid and reliable abbreviated version of the TGMD-3 for assessing motor competence in Spanish children, facilitating its use in future studies to identify typical and atypical motor development and to monitor changes in motor competence throughout primary education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    26
  • (492-505) Validación de u...
    14

References

1. Anguera, M. T., Magnussson, M.S., Jonsson, G.K. (2007). Instrumentos no estándar: Planteamiento, desarrollo y posibilidades. Avances en Medición, 5,63-82

2. Bandeira, P. F., Duncan, M., Pessoa, M. L., Soares, Í., da Silva, L., Mota, J., Martins, C. (2020). TGMD-2 short version: evidence of validity and associations with sex, age, and BMI in preschool children. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 8(3), 528-543. https://doi.org/10,1123/jmld.2019-0040

3. Bandeira, P. F., Estevan, I., Duncan, M., Lenoir, M., Lemos, L., Romo-Perez, V., Valentini, N., Martins, C. (2025). A Multilayer Network Model for Motor Competence from the View of the Science of Complexity. Sports Medicine, 55(2), 245-254. https://doi.org/10,1007/s40279-024-02164-4

4. Bardid, F., Rudd, J. R., Lenoir, M., Polman, R., Barnett, L. M. (2015). Cross-cultural comparison of motor competence in children from Australia and Belgium. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 964. https://doi.org/10,3389/fpsyg.2015.00964

5. Bardid, F., Vannozzi, G., Logan, S. W., Hardy, L. L., Barnett, L. M. (2019). A hitchhiker’s guide to assessing young people’s motor competence: Deciding what method to use. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 22(3), 311-318. https://doi.org/10,1016/j.jsams.2018.08.007

6. Barnett, L. M., Stodden, D., Cohen, K. E., Smith, J. J., Lubans, D. R., Lenoir, M., Lander, N. J. (2016). Fundamental movement skills: An important focus. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(3), 219–225. https://doi.org/10,1123/jtpe.2014-0209

7. Barnett, L. M., Webster, E. K., Hulteen, R. M., De Meester, A., Valentini, N. C., Lenoir, M., Pesce, C., Getchell, N., Lopes, V. P., Robinson, L. E. (2022). Through the looking glass: A systematic review of longitudinal evidence, providing new insight for motor competence and health. Sports Medicine, 52(4), 875-920, https://doi.org/10,1007/s40279-021-01516-8

8. Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Castellano, J., Hernández-Mendo, A., Sánchez-López, C. R., Usabiaga, O. (2014). Aplicación de la TG en el deporte para el estudio de la fiabilidad, validez y estimación de la muestra. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 23(1), 131-137.

9. Bland, J., Altman, D. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. British Medical Journal, 314, 572.

10. Brennan, R. L. (2003). Coefficients and Indexes in Generalizability Theory. University of Iowa.

11. Cairney, J., Clark, H., Dudley, D., Kriellaars, D. (2019). Physical literacy in children and youth—A construct validation study. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 38(2), 84-90, https://doi.org/10,1123/jtpe.2018-0270

12. Cao, Y., Zhang, C., Guo, R., Zhang, D., Wang, S. (2020). Performances of the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA), and validity of timing components in comparison with three commonly used agility tests in Chinese boys: An exploratory study. PeerJ, 8, e8784. https://doi.org/10,7717/peerj.8784

13. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10,1080/10705510701301834

14. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H., Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. John Wiley and Sons

15. Duncan, M. J., Martins, C., Ribeiro Bandeira, P. F., Issartel, J., Peers, C., Belton, S., O’Connor, N. E., Behan, S. (2022). TGMD-3 short version: Evidence of validity and associations with sex in Irish children. Journal of Sports Sciences, 40(2), 138-145. https://doi.org/10,1080/02640414.2021.1978161

16. Estevan, I., Menescardi, C., García‐Massó, X., Barnett, L. M., Molina‐García, J. (2021). Profiling children longitudinally: A three‐year follow‐up study of perceived and actual motor competence and physical fitness. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 31, 35-46. https://doi.org/10,1111/sms.13731

17. Estevan, I., Molina-García, J., Queralt, A., Álvarez, O., Castillo, I., Barnett, L. (2017). Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of the Test of Gross Motor Development–3. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10,1123/jmld.2016-0045

18. Fleiss, J.L. (1981) Statistical method for rates and proportions. Wiley.

19. Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

20. Franco Hidalgo-Chacon, J. P., Rodríguez-Arteche, I. Martínez-Aznar, M. M. (2022). ¿Qué hacen los estudiantes de Educación Primaria españoles fuera del horario académico? Actividades extraescolares. Revista Complutense de Educación, 33(3), 459-474. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.74490

21. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

22. Hernández-Mendo, A., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Pastrana, J. L., Morales-Sánchez, V., Ramos-Pérez, F. J. (2016). SAGT: Aplicación informática para análisis de generalizabilidad. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología del Ejercicio y el Deporte, 11(1), 77-89.

23. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2015). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

24. Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10,1080/10705519909540118

25. Hulteen, R. M., Barnett, L. M., True, L., Lander, N. J., del Pozo Cruz, B., Lonsdale, C. (2020). Validity and reliability evidence for motor competence assessments in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(15), 1717-1798. https://doi.org/10,1080/02640414.2020,1756674

26. Hulteen, R. M., Morgan, P. J., Barnett, L. M., Stodden, D. F., Lubans, D. R. (2018). Development of foundational movement skills: A conceptual model for physical activity across the lifespan. Sports Medicine, 48(7), 1533-1540, https://doi.org/10,1007/s40279-018-0892-6

27. Huotari, P., Heikinaro‐Johansson, P., Watt, A., Jaakkola, T. (2018). Fundamental movement skills in adolescents: Secular trends from 2003 to 2010 and associations with physical activity and BMI. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 28(3), 1121-1129. https://doi.org/10,1111/sms.13028

28. Isorna, M., Rial, A., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R. (2014). Motivaciones para la práctica deportiva en escolares federados y no federados. Retos. Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, (25), 80-84. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i25.34485

29. John, A., Wainwright, N., Goodway, J. D., Williams, A. (2024). The Relationship between Physical Activity and Motor Competence of Foundation Phase Children in Wales during the School Day. Children, 11(6), 629. https://doi.org/10,3390/children11060629

30. Jylänki, P., Mbay, T., Hakkarainen, A., Sääkslahti, A., Aunio, P. (2022). The effects of motor skill and physical activity interventions on preschoolers’ cognitive and academic skills: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 155, 106948. https://doi.org/10,1016/j.ypmed.2021.106948

31. Lafave M. R., Butterwick, D. J. (2014). Generalizability theory study of athletic taping using the technical skill assessment instrument. Journal of Athletic Training, 49(3), 368–372. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.2.22

32. Logan, S. W., Ross, S. M., Chee, K., Stodden, D. F., Robinson, L. E. (2018). Fundamental motor skills: A systematic review of terminology. Journal of sports sciences, 36(7), 781-796. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1340660

33. Martínez, R. (1995). Teoría de la generalizabilidad (I): Conceptos básicos. Estudios G.: Modelos de efectos aleatorios. En R. Martínez. Psicometría. Teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos. Síntesis.

34. McKenzie, T.L. (2010). Observing physical activity and its contexts. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2010.10599656

35. Medina, J., Delgado, M. A. (1999). Metodología de entrenamiento de observadores para investigaciones sobre E.F. y deporte en las que se utilice como método la observación. Motricidad, 5, 69-86.

36. Menescardi, C., Estevan, I., Falcó, C., Hernández-Mendo, A. (2017). Generalizability theory applied to olympic taekwondo combats. European Journal of Human Movement, 39, 65-81.

37. Menescardi, C., Villarrasa-Sapiña, I., Lander, N., Estevan, I. (2022). Canadian Agility Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA) in a Spanish Context: Evidences of Reliability and Validity. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 26(3), 245-255. https://doi.org/10,1080/1091367X.2021.2020794

38. Morales-Sánchez, V., Pérez-López, R., Morquecho-Sánchez, R., Hernández-Mendo, A. (2016). Generalizabilidad y gestión deportiva . Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 16(1), 161-170.

39. Newell, K. M. (2020). What are fundamental motor skills and what is fundamental about them? Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 8(2), 280–314. https://doi.org/10,1123/jmld.2020-0013

40. Reilly, T., Collins, K. (2008). Science and the Gaelic sports: Gaelic football and hurling. European Journal of Sport Science, 8(5), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390802251851

41. Robinson, L. E., Stodden, D. F., Barnett, L. M., Lopes, V. P., Logan, S. W., Rodrigues, L. P., D’Hondt, E. (2015). Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Medicine, 45(9), 1273-1284. https://doi.org/10,1007/s40279-015-0351-6

42. Stodden, D. F., Goodway, J. D., Langendorfer, S. J., Roberton, M. A., Rudisill, M. E., Garcia, C., Garcia, L. E. (2008). A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest, 60(2), 290-306. https://doi.org/10,1080/00336297.2008.10483582

43. Ulrich, D. A. (2017). Introduction to the special section: Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the TGMD-3. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 1-4.

44. Valentini, N. (2024). Motor Skill Assessment in Children and Adolescents. En A. García-Hermoso (Ed.), Promotion of Physical Activity and Health in the School Setting (pp. 133-163). Springer.

45. Valentini, N. C., Rudisill, M. E., Ribeiro-Bandeira, P. F., Hastie, P. A. (2018). The development of a short form of the Test of Gross Motor Development‐2 in Brazilian children: Validity and reliability. Child: Care, Health and Development, 44(5), 759-765. https://doi.org/10,1111/cch.12598

46. Van Rossum, T., Foweather, L., Hayes, S., Richardson, D., Morley, D. (2021). Expert recommendations for the design of a teacher-oriented movement assessment tool for children aged 4-7 years: A Delphi study. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 25(4), 283-293. https://doi.org/10,1080/1091367x.2021.1876070

47. Webster, E. K., Ulrich, D. A. (2017). Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10,1123/jmld.2016-0003

48. Wickel, E.R., Welk, G. J. (2010). Applying generalizability theory to estimate habitual activity levels. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 42(8), 1528-1534. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d107c4

49. Woods, C., Ng, K., Britton, U., McClelland, J. F., O'Keeffe, B., Sheikhi, A., ... O'Brien, W. (2023). Children’s Sport Participation and Physical Activity Study 2022. Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland, Sport Ireland and Healthy Ireland, Dublin, Ireland and Sport Northern Ireland, Belfast, Northern Ireland.

50. Zeng, N., Ayyub, M., Sun, H., Wen, X., Xiang, P., Gao, Z. (2017). Effects of physical activity on motor skills and cognitive development in early childhood: A systematic review. BioMed Research International, 2017(1), 2760716. https://doi.org/10,1155/2017/2760716

Published
16-09-2026
How to Cite
Menescardi , C., Ortega-Benavent, N., Salazar-Cruz, P., Belenguer-Troya, A., & Estevan, I. (2026). Validation of an Observation Instrument to Assess Students’ Motor Competence. Sport Psychology Notebooks, 26(3), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.6018/cpd.706101
Issue
Section
The Scientific Legacy of María Teresa Anguera Argilaga

Most read articles by the same author(s)