Is body perception associated with specific adaptations to static and dynamic tasks?
Resumen
This study examined university women for associations between somatotype profile and body self-perception, and perception of other women’s bodies, in dynamic and static tasks. The sample comprised 142 female undergraduate students (21.81 ± 3.014 years) assessed for body mass index and somatotype by World Health Organization and Heath-Carter protocols, respectively. Perception of static image was evaluated using the Brazilian Photographic Figure Rating Scale (BPFRS), and dynamic image perception, by the Category Estimation psychophysical task. The latter was performed in two regards: body self-image and images of four unknown models’ bodies. We performed the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test for analysis of variance. Dynamic and static image perception values were paired to zero (total accuracy) and analyzed by Mann-Whitney test for perceptual tendency. Spearman correlation was performed to detect associations between variables. Association between categorical variables (static and dynamic tasks) was by Chi-Square test. Somatotypical profile was found not to be associated with static and dynamic body image self-perception or with perception of unknown body images. Furthermore, looking at one’s static image is not associated with watching oneself in movement, indicating that these perceptual processes are different and independent of body shape.
Descargas
Citas
Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Alexandre, N.M.C., & Coluci, M.Z.O. (2011). Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16(7), 3061-3068.
Ambroziak, K. B., Azañón, E., & Longo, M. R. (2019). Body Size Adaptation Alters Perception of Test Stimuli, Not Internal Body Image. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2598. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02598.
Blanco, H., Benavides, E.V., Tristán, J.L., & Mayorga-Veja, D. Actividad física, imagen corporal y autoconcepto personal en jóvenes universitarias mexicanas (2017). Revista de Psicología del Deporte. 2017, 26(2), 25-33.
Becerra, C.A., Reigal, R.E., Hernández-Mendo, A., Martín-Tamayo, I. (2013). Relaciones de la condición física y la composición corporal con la autopercepción de salud. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 34(9), 305 318. http://dx.doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2013.03401.
Brierley, M.E., Brooks, K.R., Mond, J., Stevenson, R.J., & Stephen, I.D. (2016). The body and the beautiful: health, attractiveness and body composition in men’s and women’s bodies. PloS one, 11(6), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156722.
Brooks, K.R., Mond, J.M., Stevenson, & R.J. Stephen, I.D. (2016). Body image distortion and exposure to extreme body types: contingent adaptation and cross adaptation for self and other. Frontiers in neuroscience, 10 (334). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00334.
Carter, J.E.L. (2002). The Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotype-instruction manual. From htth/cmvwsomatotypeorg/Heath-CarterManual.pdf [Retrieved 31 Januuary 2013,3-4.
Carter, J.E.L., & Heath, B.H. (1990). Somatotyping: development and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cash, T.F. (2011). Crucial considerations in the assessment of body image. In Cash, T.F. and Smolak, L. (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of science, practice, and prevention. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 129–137.
Cash, T.F., & Pruzinsky, T. (2002). Future challenges for body image theory, research and clinical practice. In Cash, T.F., & Pruzinsky, T. (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research & clinical practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 509–517.
Castro, M.R., Morgado, F.F.D.R., & Freitas Junior, I.F. (2016). Brazilian Photographic Figure Rating Scale: Development and Psychometric Investigation. Perceptual and motor skills, 124(1),131-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512516677899.
Castro, M.R., Morgado, F.F.R., Paiva ACS, Magre, F.L., Christofaro, D.G.D., & Freitas Junior, I.F. (2017). Relationship between body image and somatotype profile in young women. Motricidade, 13(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.7904.
Cazzato, V., Mele, S., & Urgesi, C. (2014). Gender differences in the neural underpinning of perceiving and appreciating the beauty of the body. Behavioural Brain Research, 264: 188-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.02.001.
Cazzato, V., Siega, S., & Urgesi, C. (2012). “What women like”: influence of motion and form on esthetic body perception. Frontiers in psychology, 3: 1-10. 2012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00235.
Ceballos-Gurrola, O., Medina-Rodríguez, R.E.; Juvera-Portilla, J.L., Peche-Alejandro, P., Aguirre-López, L.F., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J. (2020). Imagen corporal y práctica de actividades físico-deportivas en estudiantes de nivel secundaria. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte,20(1), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.6018/cpd.355781.
Chang, D.H., Ban, H., Ikegaya, Y. Fujita, I., & Troje, N.F. (2018). Cortical and subcortical responses to biological motion. Neuroimage, 174: 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.013.
Cornelissen, P.L., Johns, A., & Tovée, M.J. (2013). Body size over-estimation in women with anorexia nervosa is not qualitatively different from female controls. Body Image, 10(1), 103-111.
Downing, P.E., & Peelen, M.V. (2016). Body selectivity in occipitotemporal cortex: Causal evidence. Neuropsychologia, 83: 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.033.
Gardner, R.M. (2011). Perceptual measures of body image for adolescents and adults. In Cash, T.F., & Smolak, L., Body image: A handbook of science, practice, and prevention. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press: 146-153.
García-Sánchez, A., Burgueño-Menjibar, R., López-Blanco, D., & Ortega, F.B. (2013). Condición física, adiposidad y autoconcepto en adolescentes. Estudio piloto. / Physical fitness, adiposity and self-concept in adolescents. A pilot study. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 22 (2), 453–461.
Ginis, K.A.M., Strong, H.A., Arent, S.M., Bray, S.R., & Bassett-Gunter, R.L. (2014). The effects of aerobic-versus strength-training on body image among young women with pre-existing body image concerns. Body image, 11(3), 219-227.
Hair, J.F.J.R., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Irvine, K.R., McCarty, K., McKenzie, K.J., Pollet, T.V., Cornelissen, K.K., Tovée, M.J., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2019). Distorted body image influences body schema in individuals with negative bodily atitudes. Neuropsychologia, 122: 38-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.11.015.
Krishnan-Barman, S., Forbes, P.A. & Hamilton, A.F.D.C. (2017). How can the study of action kinematics inform our understanding of human social interaction? Neuropsychologia, 105: 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.018.
Laus, M.F., Miranda, V.P.N., Almeida, S.S., Costa, T.M.B., & Ferreira, M.E.C. (2012). Geographic location, sex and nutritional status play an important role in body image concerns among Brazilian adolescents. Journal of Health Psychology, 18(3), 332-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311434755.
Legenbauer, T., Vocks, S., Betz, S., Puigcerver, M.J.B., Benecke, U.M., Troje, N.F., & Rüddel, H. (2011). Differences in the nature of body image disturbances between female obese individuals with versus without a comorbid binge eating disorder: an exploratory study including static and dynamic aspects of body image. Behavior modification, 35(2), 162-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445510393478.
Levine, D.M., Berenson, M.L., & Stephan, D. (2000). Estatística: teoria e aplicações usando microsoft excel em português. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.
McCabe, M.P., Ricciardelli, L.A., Sitaram, G., & Mikhail, K. (2006). Accuracy of body size estimation: Role of biopsychosocial variables. Body image, 3(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.01.004.
McIntyre, F., Chivers, P., Larkin, D., Rose, E., & Hands, B. (2015). Exercise can improve physical self perceptions in adolescents with low motor competence. Human Movement Science, 42 (2), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.12.003.
Mele, S., Cazzato, V. & Urgesi, C. (2013). The importance of perceptual experience in the esthetic appreciation of the body. PloS one, 8(12), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081378.
O’Toole, A.J., Phillips, P.J., Weimer, S. Roark, D.A., Ayyad, J., Barwick, R., & Dunlop, J. (2011). Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: Dissecting identity with a fusion approach. Vision Research, 51(1): 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.035.
Pasquali, L. (2003). Psicometria: Teoria dos testes na Psicologia e na Educação Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes.
Preuss, N., Brynjarsdóttir, B.L.& Ehrsson, H.H. (2018). Body ownership shapes self-orientation Perception. Scientific Reports, 8 (16062). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34260-7.
Reigal-Garrido, R., Becerra-Fernández, C.A., Hernández-Mendo, A. & Martín-Tamayo, I. (2014). Relación del autoconcepto con la condición física y la composición corporal en una muestra de adolescentes. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1079-1085. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.
Reyes-Rincón, H., Gibert-Isern,S., Ramírez-Colina,S., Pineda-Arredondo,E., Argüelles-Nava,V.G. & Campos-Uscanga,Y. (2021). Espacios naturales, bienestar psicológico y satisfacción con la imagen corporal en corredores. Revista de Psicología Aplicada al Deporte y al Ejercicio Físico, 6(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5093/rpadef2021a17
Roché, L., Hernandez, N., Blanc, R., Bonnet-Brilhault, F., Centelles, L., Schmitz, C., & Martineau. J. (2013). Discrimination between biological motion with and without social intention: A pilot study using visual scanning in healthy adults. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.01.009.
Runfola, C. D., Holle, A. V., Trace, S. E., Brownley, K. A., Hofmeier, S. M., Gagne, D. A. & Bulik, C. M. (2013). Body dissatisfaction in women across the Lifespan: results of the UNC-SELF and Gender and Body Image (GABI) studies. European Eating Disorders Review,21(1),52-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2201.
Salci, L.E., & Ginis, K.A.M. (2017). Acute effects of exercise on women with pre-existing body image concerns: A test of potential mediators. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 31: 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.04.001.
Sapey-Triomphe, L.A., Centelles, L., Roth, M., Fonlupt, P., Hénaff, M.A., Schmitz,C. & Assaiante, C. (2017). Deciphering human motion to discriminate social interactions: a developmental neuroimaging study. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 12(2): 340-351. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw117.
Silva, J.D. & Ribeiro-Filho, N.P. (2006). Avaliação e mensuração de dor: pesquisa, teoria e prática. Ribeirão Preto: FUNPEC.
Slevec, J. H. & Tiggemann, M. (2011). Predictors of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in middle-aged women. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 4, 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.002.
Sturman, D., Stephen, I.D., Mond, J., Stevenson, R.J., & Brooks, K.R. (2017). Independent Aftereffects of Fat and Muscle: Implications for neural encoding, body space representation, and body image disturbance. Scientific Reports, 7(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40392.
Smith, K.L, Tovée, M.J., Hancock, P.J.B., Bateson, M., Cox, M.A.A., & Cornelissen, P.L. (2007). An analysis of body shape attractiveness based on image statistics: Evidence for a dissociation between expressions of preference and shape discrimination. Visual Cognition ,15(8),927-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280601029515.
Swami, V., Salem, N., Furnham, A., & Tovée, M.J. (2008). Initial examination of the validity and reliability of the female Photographic Figure Rating Scale for body image assessment. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(8), 1752-1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.002.
Swami, V., Frederick, D. A., Aavik, T., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Anderson, D., Adrianto, S., Zivcic-Becirevic, I. (2010). The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: Results of the International Body Project I. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209359702.
Swami, V., Stieger, S., Harris, A.S., Nader, I.W., Pietschnig, J., Voracek, M., & Tovée, M.J. (2012). Further investigation of the validity and reliability of the photographic figure rating scale for body image assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(4), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.660293.
Thompson, J.K. (2004). The (mis) measurement of body image: ten strategies to improve assessment for applied and research purposes. Body image, 1(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00004-4.
Urrutia, S., Azpillaga, I., de Cos, G. L., & Muñoz, D. (2010). Relación entre la percepción de estado de salud con la práctica físicodeportiva y la imagen corporal en adolescentes. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 10(2). https://revistas.um.es/cpd/article/view/111271
Vangeneugden, J., Peelen, M.V., Tadin, D., & Battelli, L. (2014). Distinct neural mechanisms for body form and body motion discriminations. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(2): 574-585. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4032-13.2014.
Vocks, S., Busch, M., Grönemeyer, D., Schulte, D., Herpertz, S., & Suchan, B. (2010). Neural correlates of viewing photographs of one’s own body and another woman’s body in anorexia and bulimia nervosa: an fMRI study. Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience: JPN, 35(3), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.090048.
Vocks, S., Legenbauer, T., Rüddel, H., & Troje, N.F. (2007). Static and dynamic body image in bulimia nervosa: mental representation of body dimensions and biological motion patterns. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40(1), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20336.
White, N.C., Fawcett, J.M. & Newman, A.J. (2014). Electrophysiological markers of biological motion and human form recognition. Neuroimage, 84(1), 854-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.026.
- 20-08-2022 (2)
- 20-08-2022 (1)
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
