THow can have an influence to be a housewive on women’s fiscal awareness? The case of Spain
Supporting Agencies
- SENECA. Instituto de la Mujer
Abstract
The authors analyze the Spanish fiscal awareness through citizens’ perception on the tax system. A questionnaire is used for exploring the most influential factors: knowledge of the system, acceptance of fraud, use of social benefits without adequate compensation, and satisfaction and confidence in institutions.
Once the contingency table is built and the strength of the statistical significance is analyzed - by Cramer's V coefficient - binary logistic regression models, multinomial logistic regression and ordinal regression are applied. Educational level and employment status were taken as covariates, demonstrating the lack of statistical significance of gender in tax awareness.
There are significant differences between men, women and the group of housewives. These women show lower levels of fiscal awareness, a greater lack of knowledge about the system, more acceptance of fraud, more dissatisfaction with administrations and further distrust towards their fellow citizens.
Downloads
References
Absalón, C., & Andurzua, C. (2012). Modelos de micro simulación para el análisis de las políticas públicas [Microsimulationmodelsfor the analysisof public policies]. Gestión y Política Pública, 21, 87- 106.
Alarcón, G., Beyaert, A. and De Pablos, L. (2012). Fiscal awareness: a study of female versus male attitudes towards tax fraud in Spain. In M. Pickhardt and A. Prinz (Ed.), Tax Evasion and the Shadow Economy, 45-53. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
Alarcón, G., Quiñones, E. y Martínez, A. (2008). Mujer y conciencia fiscal. Crónica Tributaria, 127, 9–25.
Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323–328.
Alm, J., & Gomez, J. L. (2008). Social Capital and Tax Morale in Spain. Economic Analysis and Policy (EAP), 38(1), 73-87.
Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). Cultural differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 224-246.
Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1999). Changing the Social Norm of Tax Compliance by Voting. Kyklos,52 (2), 141-171.
Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which Isthe Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 293‐31.
Arrow, K. (1970). Political and Economic Evaluation of Social Effects and Externalities. In J. Margolis (Ed), The Analysis of Public Output (pp. 1-31). Research. UMI: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bailey, L. (2000). Bridging Home and Work in the Transition to Motherhood: A Discursive Study.European Journal of Women's Studies, 7, 53-70.
Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy , 76, 169-217.
Blumenthal, M., & Christian, C. (2004). Tax preparers. En H. H. Aaron & J. Selmrod (Eds.), The crisis in tax administration, 201-299. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Bravo, H., Castro, J. C., & Gutiérrez, M. A. (2011). Evaluación de una política fiscal para determinar el nivel óptimo de la inversión en los servicios de agua potable, alcantarillado y saneamiento [Evaluationoffiscal policyto determinethe optimal level ofinvestment inthe drinkingwaterand wastewater].Gestión y política Publica, 20 (1), 63-95.
Christensen, A., Weihrich, S. G., & Gerbing, M. D. (1994). The Impact of Education on Perceptions of Tax Fairness. Advances in Taxation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 63-94.
Contreras, D., & Plaza, G. (2010). Cultural Factors in Women's Labor Force Participation in Chile. Feminist Economics, 16(2), 27 – 46.
Cowen, T. (2001).The Great Stagnation: How America Ate All The Low-Hanging Fruit of Modern History, Got Sick, and Will (Eventually) Feel Better. London, England: A Penguin Special from Dutton.
Eckel, C., & Grossman, Ph. (2001). Chivalry and Solidarity in Ultimatum Games. Economic Inquiry. 39, 171‐88.
Fallan, L. (1999). Gender Exposure to Tax Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards Taxation and Experimental Approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 173–184.
Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2007). Tax Compliance as the Result of a Psychological Tax Contract: The Role of Incentives and Responsive Regulation. Law & Policy, 29(1), 102-120.
Feld, L. P., & Tyran, J. R. (2002).Tax Evasion and Voting: An Experimental Analysis. Kyklos,55, 197–221.
Frey, B. S., & Meier, S. (2004). Pro-social behavior in a natural setting. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54, 65-68.
Frey, B. S., & Torgler, B. (2007). Tax Morale and Conditional Cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(1), 136-159
Hite, D. (1997). Information and Bargaining in Markets for Environmental Quality. Land Economics,73(3), 303-316. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/s/uwp/landec.html
Jackson, B., & Milliron, V. (1986). Tax compliance research: findings, problems, and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature, 5, 125–166.
Kinsey, K., & Grasmick, H. (1993). Framing Justice: Taxpayer´sEvaluations of Personal Tax Burdens. Law and Society Review, 25, 4, 845-874.
Kirchler, E. (1998). Differential representations of taxes: Analysis of free associations and judgments of five employment groups. Journal of Socio-Economics, 27 (1), 117-131.
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The ‘‘slippery slope’’ framework. Journal of Economic Psychology,29, 210–225.
Lyon,D., & Woodward, A. (2004). Gender and Time at the Top: Cultural Constructions of Time in High-Level Careers and Homes. European Journal of Women's Studies, 11(2), 205–221.
Martínez-Vazquez, J., & Torgler, B. (2009). The evolution of tax morale in modern Spain. Journal of Economic Issues, 43(1), 1-11.
Mason, R., & Calvin, L. (1984). Public Confidence and Admitted Tax Evasion. National Tax Journal, 37(4), 489-96.
Pommerehne, W. W., & Weck-Hannemann, H. (1996). Tax rates, tax administration and income tax evasion in Switzerland. Public Choice, 88(1/2), 161-170.
Porcano, Th. (1988). Correlates of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9 (1), 47-67.
Pravadelli, V. (2010). Women and Gender Studies, Italian Style. European Journal of Women's Studies, 17, 61-67.
Prieto, J., Sanzo M. J, & Suárez, J. (2006). Análisis económico de la actitud hacia el fraude fiscal en España [Economic analysis ofthe attitude towardstax evasion inSpain].Hacienda Pública Española, 177, 107-128.
Richardson, A., & Sawyer, M.(2001). A Taxonomy of the Tax Compliance Literature. Further Findings, Problems and Prospects. Australian Tax Forum, 16, 137-320.
Sánchez-Meca, J., &Velandrino, A. P. (1992). Presentación del Dossier [Presentation of thedossier]. Anales de Psicología, 8, 1-2.
Schmölders, G. (1960). Survey Research in Public Finance: A Behavioral Approach to Fiscal Theory. Public Finance,25, 300-306.
Serrano, J.M., & Ato, M. (1984). Una interpretación geométrica de los estadísticos uni y multivariados [A geometricinterpretation of statisticalunivariate andmultivariate]. Anales de Psicología, 1, 225-263.
Sevilla, A., Giménez, J. I., & Fernández, C. (2010). Gender roles and the division of unpaid work in Spanish households. Feminist Economics, 14, 137-184.
Sobral, J., Arce, R., & Prieto, A. (1994). Manual de Psicología Jurídica. Barcelona, España: Paidos.
Spicer, M. W., & Lundstedt, S. B. (1976). Understanding tax evasion. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 31, 295-305.
Timonen, V., & Doyle, M. (2010). Migrant Care Workers’ Relationships with Care Recipients, Colleagues and Employers. European Journal of Women's Studies, 17,25-41.
Tipke, K. (2002). Moral tributaria del Estado y de los contribuyentes. Madrid, España: Marcial Pons.
Tittle, Ch. (1980). Sanctions and Social Deviance: The Question of Deterrence. New York: Praeger.
Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2009). The Impact of Tax Morale and Institutional Quality on the Shadow Economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 228-245.
Vogel, J. (1994). Taxation and Public Opinion in Sweden: An Interpretation of Recent Survey Data. National Tax Journal, 27, 499-513.
Wenzel, M. (2006). The Impact of Outcome Orientation and Justice Concerns on Tax Compliance: The Role of Taxpayers' Identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 629-645.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.
