Perfiles cognitivos de ASIS de niños con problemas de aprendizaje
Resumen
Las escalas de inteligencia se utilizan ampliamente para el análisis de perfiles cognitivos en el diagnóstico de problemas de aprendizaje. El propósito de este estudio fue explorar los perfiles cognitivos de los niños con problemas de aprendizaje en una nueva prueba de inteligencia, la Escala de Inteligencia Anadolu-Sak. La prueba de inteligencia se administró a 89 niños diagnosticados con discapacidades generales de aprendizaje. Se seleccionó aleatoriamente un grupo de control emparejado (N = 92) de la muestra estándar. Los análisis de datos incluyeron análisis de perfil latente y comparaciones de puntuaciones entre grupos y comparaciones dentro de los grupos. Los hallazgos mostraron que la inteligencia general media y los medios de la capacidad verbal y visual de los niños con problemas de aprendizaje estaban en el rango promedio pero más cerca del límite inferior. La media de la memoria de trabajo estaba ligeramente por debajo del rango medio y significativamente más baja que la media del grupo de control emparejado. Los análisis de perfil latente mostraron tres perfiles distintos: el perfil en zigzag, el perfil ondulado y el perfil en cascada. La única debilidad compartida por los tres perfiles es la memoria de procesamiento secuencial visual. Los resultados implican que la memoria de procesamiento secuencial débil puede contribuir a las discapacidades de aprendizaje.
Descargas
Citas
Ackerman, P. T., Peters, J. E., & Dykman, R. A. (1971). Children with specific learning disabilities WISC profiles. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4(3), 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221947100400305.
Alloway, T. P. (2009). Working memory, but not IQ, predicts subsequent learning in children with learning difficulties. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.25.2.92
Alm, J., & Kaufman, A. S. (2002). The Swedish WAIS-R factor structure and cognitive profiles for adults with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(4), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194020350040301
Altınoğlu-Dikmeer, İ., & Gençöz, T. (2009). Özgül öğrenme güçlüğü belirtileri olan çocukların Wisconsin kart eşleme testi ve Wechsler çocuklar için zeka ölçeği puanlarının incelenmesi [Evaluation of Wisconsin card sorting test and Wechsler intelligence scale for children scores among children with and without symptoms of learning disability]. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 16(1), 3-12.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM -5 (Vol. 5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Arslan, D., Sak, U., & Atesgöz, N. N. (2021). Are more humorous children more intelligent? A case from Turkish Culture. Humor, 34(4), 567-588. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2021-0054
Bannatyne, A. (1968). Diagnosing learning disabilities and writing remedial prescriptions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1(4), 242-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221946800100403.
Bannatyne, A. (1974) Diagnosis: A note on recategorization of the WISC scaled scores. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(2), 72-73.
Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D., & El Khouri, B. M. (2003). Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach. New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606822
Biederman, J., & Faraone, S. V. (2005). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Lancet, 366(9481), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66915-2.
Bilgiç, A., Kılıç, B. G., Gürkan, K., & Aysev, A. (2006). Dikkat eksikliği hiperaktivite bozukluğu tanısı konulan bir klinik örneklemde yıkıcı davranış bozuklukları ve özgül öğrenme bozuklukları [Disruptive behavior disorders and specific learning disorders in a clinical sample with diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder]. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 13(2), 54-59.
Cirik, M., Sak, U., & Opengin, E. (2020). An investigation of cognitive profiles of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder through the Anadolu-Sak Intelligence Scale. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 21(4). 663-685. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.570505.
Clarizio, H., & Bernard, R. (1981). Recategorized WISC-R scores of learning disabled children and differential diagnosis. Psychology in the Schools, 18(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198101)18:1<5::AID-PITS2310180102>3.0.CO;2-B
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Daley, C. E., & Nagle, R. J. (1996). Relevance of WISC-III indicators for assessment of learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14(4), 320-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299601400401
D'Angiulli, A., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). Cognitive functioning as measured by the WISC-R: Do children with learning disabilities have distinctive patterns of performance? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949903200405
Doll, B., & Boren, R. (1993). Performance of severely language-impaired students on the WISC-III, language scales, and academic achievement measures. In B. A. Bracken & R. S. McCallum (Eds.), Advances in psychoeducational assessment (pp. 77-86). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology.
Dykman, R. A., Peters, J. E., & Ackerman, P. T. (1973). Experimental approaches to the study of minimal brain dysfunction: A follow-up study. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 205(1), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb43167.x.
Erdoğan-Bakar, E., Volkan, E., Işık, Y., & Karakaş, S. (2016). WÇZÖ-R için Bannatyne ve Kaufman sınıflamalarının Türk çocuk örneklemlerine uygulanabilirliği [Applicability of the Bannatyne and Kaufman classifications of WISC-R to Turkish children]. Yeni Symposium, 54(2), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.5455/NYS.20160502121327.
Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 545-552. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380061101
Görgün, B. (2017). Özel öğrenme güçlüğünün tanılanması [Diagnosis of special learning disabilities]. In M. A. Melekoğlu & U. Sak (Eds.), Öğrenme güçlüğü ve özel yetenek (pp. 54-77). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Gresham, F. M., & Vellutino, F. R. (2010). What is the role of intelligence in the identification of specific learning disabilities? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(4), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00317.x.
Huelsman, C. B. (1970). The Wisc Subtest Syndrome for Disabled Readers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 30(2), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1970.30.2.535
Hyman, S. L., Shores, E. A., & North, K. N. (2006). Learning disabilities in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: subtypes, cognitive profile, and attention-deficit– hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 48(12), 973–977. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162206002131
Kaufman, A. S. (1981). The WISC-R and learning disabilities assessment: State of the art. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(9), 520-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948101400907
Kaufman, A. S., Lichtenberger, E. O., Fletcher-Janzen, E., & Kaufman, N. L. (2005). Essentials of KABC-II assessment. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.
Kaya-Şekeral, C., & Güngörmüş-Özkardeş, O. (2013). Üstün zekâlı öğrencilerde özel öğrenme güçlüğü belirtilerinin taranması [A survey of identifying symptoms of specific learning disabilities of gifted children]. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(24), 197-219.
Kentfield, M. L. (1988). WISC-R profiles of learning-disabled students: A recategorization. Retrieved from Cal State East Bay Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
Köprü, F., & Ayas, M. B. (2020). An investigation of the criterion validity of the Anadolu Sak Intelligence Scale (ASIS): The case of EPTS. Talent, 10(2), 110-128. https://doi.org/10.46893/talent.857308
Lerner, J. W., & Johns, B. H. (2012). Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities. Canada: Nelson Education.
Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. Little (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods (pp. 551-611). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Mayes, S. D., Calhoun, S. I., & Crowell, E. W. (1998). WISC-III profiles for children with and without learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 35(4), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199810)35:4<309::AID-PITS1>3.0.CO;2-V
McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004.
Melekoğlu, M. A. (2017). Özel öğrenme güçlüğünün nedenleri ve özellikleri [Causes and characteristics of specific learning disabilities]. In M. A. Melekoğlu & U. Sak (Eds.), Öğrenme güçlüğü ve özel yetenek (pp. 24-53). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Nelson, S. A. (2008). Associations between intelligence test scores and test session behavior in children with ADHD, LD, and EBD. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Vermont, Vermont.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthe´n, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
Ottem, E. (1998). Interpreting the WISC-R subtest scores of reading impaired children - A structural approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00049.
Prifitera, A., & Dersh, J. (1993). Base rates of WISC-III diagnostic subtest patterns among normal, learning-disabled, and ADHD samples. In B. A. Bracken & R. S. McCallum (Eds.), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (pp. 43–55). Clinical Psychology Publishing Co.
Roid, G. H., & Barram, R. A. (2004). Clinical applications of the SB5. In A. S. Kaufman & N. L. Kaufman (Eds.), Essentials of psychological assessments: Essentials of Stanford Binet Intelligence Scales (SB5) assessment (pp. 115-139). Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley.
Roid, G. H. (2003). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
Rugel, R. P. (1974). WISC subtest scores of disabled readers: A review with respect to Bannatyne's recategorization. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(1), 48-55.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002221947400700109
Sak, U., Bal-Sezerel, B., Ayas, B., Tokmak, F., Özdemir, N. N., Demirel-Gürbüz, Ş., & Öpengin, E. (2016). Anadolu Sak Intelligence Scale: ASIS practitioner’s book. Eskisehir: Anadolu University UYEP Center.
Sak, U., Bal-Sezerel, B., Dulger, E., Sozel, K., & Ayas, M. B. (2019). Validity of the Anadolu-Sak Intelligence Scale in the identification of gifted students. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 61(3), 263-283.
Sandoval, J, Sassenrath, J., & Penaloza, M. (1988). Similarity of WISC-R and WAIS-R scores at age 16. Psychology in the School, 25, 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198810)25:4<373::AID-PITS2310250404>3.0.CO;2-L
Schiff, M. M., Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1981). Scatter analysis of WISC-R profiles for learning disabled children with superior intelligence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(7), 400-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948101400711
Schmidt, H. P., & Saklofske, D. H. (1983). Comparison of the WISC-R patterns of children of average and exceptional ability. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 539-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/003329418305300201.
Siegel, L. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(8), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948902200803.
Siegel, L. S. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: A perspective on Guckenberger v. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(4), 304-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949903200405
Smith, C., & Strick, L. (2010). Learning disabilities: A to Z: A complete guide to learning disabilities from preschool to adulthood. New York, NY: Free Press.
Smith, M. D., Coleman, J. M., Dokecki, P. R., & Davis, E. E. (1977). Recategorized WISC-R scores of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10(7), 437-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221947701000708
Soysal, Ş., Koçkar-İlden, A., Erdoğan, E., Şenol, S. & Gücüyener, K. (2001). Öğrenme güçlüğü olan bir grup hastanın WISC-R profillerinin incelenmesi. Klinik Psikiyatri, 4, 225-231.
Sözel, H. K., Öpengin, E., Sak, U., & Karabacak, F. (2018). The discriminant validity of the Anadolu-Sak Intelligence Scale (ASIS) for gifted and other special education groups. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 8(2), 160-180.
Spafford, C. S. (1989). Wechsler Digit Span subtest: Diagnostic usefulness with dyslexic children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69(1), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1989.69.1.115
Sterba, S. K. (2013). Understanding linkages among mixture models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(6), 775-815. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.827564
Tamul, Ö. F., Sezerel, B. B., Sak, U., & Karabacak, F. (2020). Social validity study of the Anadolu-Sak intelligence Scale (ASIS). PAU Journal of Education, 49, 393-412. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.575479.
Turan, F., & Ege, P. (2003). Dil sorunu olan çocuklar için bütüncül dil. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 31-43.
Turgut, S. (2008). Özgül öğrenme güçlüğünde nöropsikolojik profil. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Social Studies Institute, Ankara.
Vargo, F. E., Grosser, G. S., & Spafford, K. S. (1995). Digit span and other WISC-R scores in the diagnosis of dyslexia in children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80(3), 1219-1229. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1995.80.3c.1219.
Watkins, M. W., Kush, J. C., & Glutting, J. J. (1997). Discriminant and predictive validity of the WISC III ACID profile among children with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 34(4), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199710)34:4<309::AID-PITS2>3.0.CO;2-G.
Derechos de autor 2022 Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia (España)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
