EPTS Curriculum Model in the Education of Gifted Students

  • Ugur Sak Anadolu University
Keywords: Gifted Education, acceleration, EPTS, Gifted curriculum


In this article, the author reviews the EPTS Model (Education Programs for Talented Students) and discuss how it was developed through multiple stages, the ways it is used to develop programs for gifted students, and then presents research carried out on the effectiveness of this model in the education of gifted students. The EPTS Model has two dimensions: ability and content. The ability dimension has a hierarchical structure composed of three levels of cognitive skills. The content dimension is the extension of the regular curriculum but organized at four levels: data, concept, generalization and theory. Included in the article also is a brief critics of the current state of curricular programs in gifted education.


Ayas, M. B. (2012). ÜYEP fen bilimleri müfredatının değerlendirilmesi [An evaluation of the UYEP Science programs]. 3. Türkiye Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi, Ankara, Turkey.

Ackerman, P., & Beier, M. E. (2003). Trait complexities, cognitive investment, and domain knowledge. In R.J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (1-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Banks, J. A., Clegg, A. A. (1990). Teaching strategies for the social studies: Inquiry, valuing, and decision-making (4th ed.). New York: Longman.

Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted and talented. New York: Teachers College Press.

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol.I). Iowa City: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, The University of Iowa.

Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbookof expertise and expert performance (683-704). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R. W. (2005). Giftedness viewed from the expert-performance perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 3/4, 287-311.

Lefebvre, C., Comrie, B., & Cohen, H. (Eds.). (2013). New perspectives on the origin of language. Studies in Language Companion Series, Book 144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (2000). Instructional psychology and the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed.), (pp. 383-396). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.

Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.C. (1992). Meta analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73-77.

Maker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, Maryland: Aspen System Corporation.

Maker, C. J., & Schiever, S. W. (2010). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners. Austin, TX: pro-ed.

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2000). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed. pp 367-382). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.

Sağlam-Demir, K., & Aksoy-Pehlivan, T. (2013). Anabilim UYEP modelinin üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin akademik gelişimleri üzerindeki etkisi [The effects of the Anabilim UYEP model on gifted students’ academic development]. Paper presented at the third International Conference on Talent Development and Excellence, Antalya, Turkey.

Sak, U. (2009a). Test of the three-mathematical minds (M3) for the identification of mathematically gifted students. Roeper Review, 31, 53-67.

Sak, U. (2009b). Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları [Education programs for talented students]. Ankara: Maya Akademi.

Sak, U. (2011a). An overview of the social validity of the Education Programs for Talented Students Model (EPTS). Education and Science, 36, 213-229.

Sak, U. (2011b). Üstün zekalılar: Özellikleri tanılanmaları eğitimleri. 2. bas. (The gifted: Characteristics, identification and education. 2nd ed.). Ankara: Vize yayıncılık.

Sak, U. (2013). Education Programs for Talented Students Model (EPTS) and its effectiveness on gifted students' mathematical creativity. Education and Science, 38, 169, 51-61.

Sak. U. (2014): ÜYEP Modeli: Üstün yeteneklilerin eğitimi akıl oyunları değildir [Model UYEP: Education for gifted students is not mind game]. Panel bildirisi. 4. Ulusal Üstün Zekalı ve Yeteneklilerin Eğitimi Kongresi. İstanbul, Turkey.

Sak, U., Demirel-Gürbüz, S., Bal-Sezerel, B., Ayas, M. B., & Özdemir, N. N. (2013). Dünden bugüne ÜYEP: Bilimsel araştırmalar ve uygulamalar. [UYEO from yesterday to today: research and practices on UYEP]. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Talent Development & Excellence, 25-28 September, Antalya, Turkey.

Sak, U., & Karabacak, F. (2010). What research says about the Education Programs for Talented Students (EPTS). 12th ECHA Conference, Paris, France.

Sak, U., Karabacak, F., & Kılıç, A. (2009). Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitim Programları (ÜYEP): Tanılama, Öğretim ve Değerlendirme Biçimleri ve Programın Öğrenciler Üzerindeki Etkileri [Education Programs for Talented Students (UYEP):identification, teaching and assessment]. Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar II. Ulusal Kongresi, Eskişehir, Turkey.

Sak, U., Akyol, G., Sağlam-Demir, K., Aksoy-Pehlivan, T., Dora, S., Özdek, S., & Karakan, Y. (2014). Anabilim UYEP Model: A special program model for self-contained classrooms for the gifted in Turkey. Paper presented at 14th International ECHA Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Stanley, J. S. (1977). Rationale of the Study of Mathematically Precocous Youth (SMPY) during its first five years of promoting educational acceleration. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George & C. H. Solano (Eds.), the gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective (pp. 75-112). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Moon, S. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 39-53.

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Teaching for successful intelligence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). Teaching for successful intelligence. (2nd ed.). Arlington Heights, IL: SkyLight.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2008). Differentiated instruction. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 167-177). Waco, TX: Pruffrock Press.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2009). Myth 8: The “patch-on” approach to programming is effective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 254-256.

Triffinger, D., Nassab, C. A., Selby, E. C., (2009). Programming for talent development: expanding horizons for gifted education. In T. Bolchin, B. Hymer & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to gifted education (pp. 2010-2017). New York: Routledge.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (1998). A comprehensive model of program development. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Excellence in educating gifted and talented learners. (pp. 309-334). Denver: Love.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2000). Theory and research on curriculum development for the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed. pp 345-365). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2005). Acceleration: Strategies for teaching gifted learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.

Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Brown, E. F. (2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education, Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 342-358.

How to Cite
Sak, U. (2016). EPTS Curriculum Model in the Education of Gifted Students. Anales De Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 32(3), 683-694. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.3.259441
Monographic theme: High Ability (giftedness and talent)