El Modelo de curriculum EPTS para la Educación de los Alumnos Superdotados
Resumen
En este artículo el autor revisa el modelo de los Programas para alumnos Superdotados y Talentos (EPTS, por sus siglas en inglés) desarrollados en la Anadolu University. Se discute como dichos programas se han desarrollado a través de múltiples fases, la forma en que estos se usan para desarrollar programas educativos para alumnos superdotados y la investigación llevada a cabo sobre la efectividad de este modelo educativo. El modelo EPTS tiene dos dimensiones: habilidad y contenido. La dimensión de habilidad tiene una estructura jerárquica compuesta por tres niveles de destrezas cognitivas. La dimensión de contenido es la extensión del currículo ordinario pero organizado en cuatro niveles: datos, conceptos, generalización y teoría. En el artículo también se incluye una breve crítica sobre el estado actual de los programas curriculares en la educación de alumnos superdotados.
Descargas
Citas
Ayas, M. B. (2012). ÜYEP fen bilimleri müfredatının değerlendirilmesi [An evaluation of the UYEP Science programs]. 3. Türkiye Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi, Ankara, Turkey.
Ackerman, P., & Beier, M. E. (2003). Trait complexities, cognitive investment, and domain knowledge. In R.J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (1-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Banks, J. A., Clegg, A. A. (1990). Teaching strategies for the social studies: Inquiry, valuing, and decision-making (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted and talented. New York: Teachers College Press.
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol.I). Iowa City: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, The University of Iowa.
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbookof expertise and expert performance (683-704). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R. W. (2005). Giftedness viewed from the expert-performance perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 3/4, 287-311.
Lefebvre, C., Comrie, B., & Cohen, H. (Eds.). (2013). New perspectives on the origin of language. Studies in Language Companion Series, Book 144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (2000). Instructional psychology and the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed.), (pp. 383-396). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.C. (1992). Meta analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73-77.
Maker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, Maryland: Aspen System Corporation.
Maker, C. J., & Schiever, S. W. (2010). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners. Austin, TX: pro-ed.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2000). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed. pp 367-382). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Sağlam-Demir, K., & Aksoy-Pehlivan, T. (2013). Anabilim UYEP modelinin üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin akademik gelişimleri üzerindeki etkisi [The effects of the Anabilim UYEP model on gifted students’ academic development]. Paper presented at the third International Conference on Talent Development and Excellence, Antalya, Turkey.
Sak, U. (2009a). Test of the three-mathematical minds (M3) for the identification of mathematically gifted students. Roeper Review, 31, 53-67.
Sak, U. (2009b). Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları [Education programs for talented students]. Ankara: Maya Akademi.
Sak, U. (2011a). An overview of the social validity of the Education Programs for Talented Students Model (EPTS). Education and Science, 36, 213-229.
Sak, U. (2011b). Üstün zekalılar: Özellikleri tanılanmaları eğitimleri. 2. bas. (The gifted: Characteristics, identification and education. 2nd ed.). Ankara: Vize yayıncılık.
Sak, U. (2013). Education Programs for Talented Students Model (EPTS) and its effectiveness on gifted students' mathematical creativity. Education and Science, 38, 169, 51-61.
Sak. U. (2014): ÜYEP Modeli: Üstün yeteneklilerin eğitimi akıl oyunları değildir [Model UYEP: Education for gifted students is not mind game]. Panel bildirisi. 4. Ulusal Üstün Zekalı ve Yeteneklilerin Eğitimi Kongresi. İstanbul, Turkey.
Sak, U., Demirel-Gürbüz, S., Bal-Sezerel, B., Ayas, M. B., & Özdemir, N. N. (2013). Dünden bugüne ÜYEP: Bilimsel araştırmalar ve uygulamalar. [UYEO from yesterday to today: research and practices on UYEP]. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Talent Development & Excellence, 25-28 September, Antalya, Turkey.
Sak, U., & Karabacak, F. (2010). What research says about the Education Programs for Talented Students (EPTS). 12th ECHA Conference, Paris, France.
Sak, U., Karabacak, F., & Kılıç, A. (2009). Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitim Programları (ÜYEP): Tanılama, Öğretim ve Değerlendirme Biçimleri ve Programın Öğrenciler Üzerindeki Etkileri [Education Programs for Talented Students (UYEP):identification, teaching and assessment]. Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar II. Ulusal Kongresi, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Sak, U., Akyol, G., Sağlam-Demir, K., Aksoy-Pehlivan, T., Dora, S., Özdek, S., & Karakan, Y. (2014). Anabilim UYEP Model: A special program model for self-contained classrooms for the gifted in Turkey. Paper presented at 14th International ECHA Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Stanley, J. S. (1977). Rationale of the Study of Mathematically Precocous Youth (SMPY) during its first five years of promoting educational acceleration. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George & C. H. Solano (Eds.), the gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective (pp. 75-112). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Moon, S. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 39-53.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Teaching for successful intelligence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). Teaching for successful intelligence. (2nd ed.). Arlington Heights, IL: SkyLight.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2008). Differentiated instruction. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 167-177). Waco, TX: Pruffrock Press.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2009). Myth 8: The “patch-on” approach to programming is effective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 254-256.
Triffinger, D., Nassab, C. A., Selby, E. C., (2009). Programming for talent development: expanding horizons for gifted education. In T. Bolchin, B. Hymer & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to gifted education (pp. 2010-2017). New York: Routledge.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1998). A comprehensive model of program development. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Excellence in educating gifted and talented learners. (pp. 309-334). Denver: Love.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2000). Theory and research on curriculum development for the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed. pp 345-365). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2005). Acceleration: Strategies for teaching gifted learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.
Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Brown, E. F. (2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education, Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 342-358.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2024
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
