The The countermovement to Open Science: frontal resistance, market absorption and epistemic delegitimation

Fabiano Couto Corrêa da Silva

doi:10.6018/analesdoc.725221

Autores/as

Fabiano Couto Corrêa da Silva Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5014-8853

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.725221

Palabras clave: Ciencia Abierta, Colonialismo de datos, Tasas de procesamiento de artículos, Política científica

Agencias de apoyo

Este trabajo contó con el apoyo del Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico — CNPq, Brasil, proceso n.º 305515/2024-1

Resumen

La Ciencia Abierta se ha consolidado como agenda normativa internacional tras la Recomendación de la UNESCO de 2021, pero las resistencias a ella suelen tratarse como barreras aisladas. Este artículo interpreta esas fuerzas como un contramovimiento, a partir de la teoría de los movimientos y contramovimientos sociales. Con base en análisis documental y en la reconstrucción analítica del caso brasileño entre 2019 y 2022, se identifican tres modalidades: resistencia frontal, absorción mercantil y deslegitimación epistémica. La resistencia frontal opera mediante desfinanciamiento, censura y supresión de datos; la absorción mercantil monetiza la apertura mediante APC, acuerdos transformativos e infraestructuras propietarias; y la deslegitimación epistémica erosiona la confianza pública en la ciencia. Se concluye que las políticas de Ciencia Abierta que ignoran la captura mercantil tienden a producir una apertura aparente, especialmente en el Sur Global.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Metrics

Vistas/Descargas

Resumen
13
PDF-ENG
4

Citas

Allen, Christopher and Mehler, David-M-A. (2019). Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond. PLOS Biology, 17(5), Article e3000246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246

Ancion, Zoé, Borrell-Damián; Lidia, Mounier, Pierre; Rooryck, Johan & Saenen, Bregt. (2022). Action plan for Diamond Open Access. Science Europe, cOAlition S, OPERAS, & ANR. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6282402

Appel, André-Luiz and Albagli, Sarita. (2019). The adoption of Article Processing Charges as a business model by Brazilian Open Access journals. Transinformação, 31, Article e180045. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e180045

Beigel, Fernanda; Packer; Abel L.; Gallardo, Osvaldo & Salatino, Maximiliano. (2024). OLIVA: La producción científica indexada en América Latina. Diversidad disciplinar, colaboración institucional y multilingüismo en SciELO y Redalyc (1995-2018). Dados, 67(1), Article e20210174. https://doi.org/10.1590/dados.2024.67.1.307

Borgman, Christine-L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. MIT Press.

Borrego, Ángel. (2023). Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review. Learned Publishing, 36(3), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1558

Butler, Leigh-Ann; Matthias, Lisa; Simard, Marc-André; Mongeon, Philippe and Haustein, Stefanie. (2023). The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(4), 778-799. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00272

Cadernos de Saúde Pública, História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde, Revista Fitos, Trabalho, Educação e Saúde, & Vigilância Sanitária em Debate. (2019). Contribuições ao debate sobre a avaliação da produção científica no Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 35(10), e00173219. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00173219

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. (2023). Documento base Qualis Referência. https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/documentos/conselho-tecnico-cientifico-da-educacao-superior/anexos-ctc-es/DocumentobaseQualisCTC198SEI1606400.pdf

Costa, Luciana-Ferreira-da e Gomes, Jorge-de-Oliveira. (2021). O “apagão” do Currículo Lattes [Editorial]. Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento, 11(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2236-417X.2020v11n2.60694

Couldry, Nick and Mejias, Ulises-A. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632

Debat, Humberto and Babini, Dominique. (2020). Plan S in Latin America: A precautionary note. Scholarly and Research Communication, 11(1), Article 0101347. https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2020v11n1a347

Escobar, Herton. (2019). Brazilian president attacks deforestation data. Science, 365(6452), 419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.365.6452.419

Fecher, Benedikt and Friesike, Sascha. (2014). Open science: One term, five schools of thought. In Sönke Bartling & Sascha Friesike (Eds.), Opening science: The evolving guide on how the Internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing (pp. 17-47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2

Felix, Victória-Lopes; Lazzarin, Fabiana-Aparecida e Autran, Marynice-de-Medeiros-Matos. (2022). Estudo longitudinal sobre o processo de avaliação dos critérios Qualis-Capes periódicos e seus impactos no estabelecimento dos novos parâmetros 2020. Ciência da Informação, 51(1), 19-30. https://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/5586

Fonseca, Elize-Massard-da; Nattrass, Nicoli; Lazaro, Lira-Luz-Benites and Bastos, Francisco-Inácio. (2021). Political discourse, denialism and leadership failure in Brazil’s response to COVID-19. Global Public Health, 16(8-9), 1251-1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2021.1945123

Gallardo, Osvaldo; Milia, Matías, André, Luiz Appel; GRIP-APC Team & van Schalkwyk, François. (2024). When researchers pay to publish: Results from a survey on APCs in four countries [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.12144

Haustein, Stefanie; Schares, Eric; Alperin, Juan-Pablo; Hare, Madelaine; Butler, Leigh-Ann and Schönfelder, Nina. (2024). Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.16551

Larivière, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie and Mongeon, Philippe. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLOS ONE, 10(6), Article e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Lo, Clarence-Y-H. (1982). Countermovements and conservative movements in the contemporary U.S. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 107-134. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000543

McCright, Aaron-M and Dunlap, Riley-E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47(4), 499-522. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097132

Meyer, David-S and Staggenborg, Suzanne. (1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1628-1660. https://doi.org/10.1086/230869

Mottl, Tahi-L. (1980). The analysis of countermovements. Social Problems, 27(5), 620-635. https://doi.org/10.2307/800200

Muriel-Torrado, Enrique; Bisset-Alvarez, Edgar e Barros, Camila. (2019). Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 24(56), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2019.e67371

Open Knowledge Brasil. (2021). Índice de transparência da Covid-19: Balanço das avaliações (2020-2021). https://transparenciacovid19.ok.org.br/

OpenAIRE. (2020). OpenAIRE Guidelines for institutional and thematic repository managers. https://guidelines.openaire.eu

Ortega, Francisco and Orsini, Michael. (2020). Governing COVID-19 without government in Brazil: Ignorance, neoliberal authoritarianism, and the collapse of public health leadership. Global Public Health, 15(9), 1257-1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1795223

Packer, Abel-L. (2009). The SciELO Open Access: A gold way from the South. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 39(3), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v39i3.479

Pavan, Cleusa and Barbosa, Marcia-C. (2018). Article processing charge (APC) for publishing open access articles: The Brazilian scenario. Scientometrics, 117(2), 805-823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2896-2

Posada, Alejandro and Chen, George. (2018). Inequality in knowledge production: The integration of academic infrastructure by big publishers. In Leslie Chan & Pierre Mounier (Eds.), Connecting the knowledge commons: From projects to sustainable infrastructure. OpenEdition Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2018.30

Schimmer, Ralf; Geschuhn, Kai-Karin and Vogler, Andreas. (2015). Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access. Max Planck Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.17617/1.3

Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência. (2021). Nota sobre o corte no orçamento do Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações. https://portal.sbpcnet.org.br/noticias/congresso-precisa-rever-cortes-na-area-de-ciencia/

Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência. (2022). Nota sobre os bloqueios no orçamento da ciência e tecnologia em 2022.

Suber, Peter. (2012). Open access. MIT Press.

Transparência Brasil. (2023). Sigilos de 100 anos: O uso do art. 31 da LAI em negativas de acesso à informação. https://www.transparencia.org.br/downloads/publicacoes/sigilo_100anos_uso_art_31_lai_negativas.pdf

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on Open Science. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546

Vicente-Sáez, Rubén and Martínez-Fuentes, Clara. (2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88, 428-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043

Wardle, Claire and Derakhshan, Hossein. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c

Zald, Mayer-N and Useem, Bert. (1987). Movement and countermovement interaction: Mobilization, tactics, and state involvement. In Mayer N. Zald & John D. McCarthy (Eds.), Social movements in an organizational society (pp. 247-272).