«Humanicity» as a linguistic category and functional-semantic field
Supporting Agencies
- Universidad de Granada
Abstract
This article proposes the existence and analyses the category of humanicity, understood as the way in which natural languages classify and express external reality in two large fields: the human sphere (which the speaker understands as belonging to human society, the area of life, customs, rituals, civilization and culture specific to human beings) and the natural sphere (the sphere of everything outwith the human community, outwith the area of influence of human civilization; that is, natural phenomena, flora and fauna in their wild, “undomesticated” or “uncivilised” state).
The functional-semantic field of humanicitywould be the set of resources of the different linguistic levels (phonetic-phonological, morphological, syntactic and lexical) of a given language for configuring the reference points of reality and classifying them based on their category of humanicity(human sphere vs natural sphere). Humanicity, must therefore not be confused with well-known phenomena such as linguistic animacyor the morphosyntactic distinction between human/non-human.
Downloads
References
[Akademija Nauk Sssr] Академия Наук Ссср (1980): Русская грамматика. 2 т., Москва, Наука.
Ambrazas, Vytautas (ed.) (1997): Lithuanian Grammar, Vilnius, Baltos Lankos.
Amichba, Khibla (2018): The Abkhazian language and its place in the Caucasian family of languages, Abkhaz World: Online. En línea:
com/aw/abkhazians/language/662-the-abkhazian-language> [20/01/2020].
[Arutjunova] Арутюнова, Нина Давидовна (1999): Язык и мир человека, 2-е изд., испр., Москва, Языки русской культуры.
Bach, Emmon y Harms, Robert Thomas (eds.) (1968): Universals in Linguistic Theory, New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winson.
Balodis, Uldis (2016): Yuki Grammar: With Sketches of Huchnom and Coast Yuki, Oakland, University of California Press.
Beard, Robert (1995): «The Gender-Animacy Hypothesis», Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 3(1), pp. 59-96.
Becker, Misha (2014): The Acquisition of Syntactic Structure: Animacy and Thematic Alignment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berlin, Brent y Key, Paul (1969): Basic Color Terms. Their Universality and Evolution, Berkeley–Los Angeles–Oxford, University of California Press.
[Bondarko] Бондарко, Александр Владимирович (отв. ред.) (1987): Теория функциональной грамматики: Введение. Аспектуальность. Временная локализованность. Таксис, Ленинград, Наука.
[Bondarko] Бондарко, Александр Владимирович (отв. ред.) (1990): Теория функциональной грамматики: Темпоральность. Модальность, Ленинград, Наука.
[Bondarko] Бондарко, Александр Владимирович (отв. ред.) (1992): Теория функциональной грамматики: Субъектность. Объектность. Коммуника- тивная перспектива высказывания. Определенность / неопределенность, Санкт-Петербург, Наука.
Bronnikov, G. y Krylov, Phil (1998-2014): Search for data in: Indo-Eu- ropean etymology / Harbour Project, Starling database server. En línea: <http://starling.rinet.ru/cgi-bin/query.cgi?basename=dataie piet&root=config&morpho=0> [20/01/2020].
Collado Vega, José Antonio (2016): Peculiaridades percepto cognitivas: diferencias intralingüísticas en categorías de color básicas [tesis doctoral], Madrid, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. En línea <http://eprints.ucm. es/37646/1/T37207.pdf> [19/01/2020].
Comrie, Bernard (1989): Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. 2nd ed., Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Corbett, Greville (1980): «Animacy in Russian and other Slavonic languages: Where Syntax and semantics fail to match», en Catherine Chvany & Richard Brecht (eds.). Morpho-syntax in Slavic. Columbus, OH, Slavica.
Corriente, Federico (2006): Gramática árabe, Barcelona, Herder.
Dahl, Östen y Fraurud, Kari (1996): «Animacy in grammar and discourse», en T. Fretheim & J. K. Gundel (Eds.). Reference and referent accessibility (pp. 47-64), Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Duranti, Alessandro (1997): Linguistic Anthropology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Fartakh, Adel (1997): La connotación y la idiosincrasia lingüística y cultural (Asociaciones semántico-léxicas en el español de Granada y el árabe de Tetuán (Marruecos)), tesis doctoral, Granada.
Foxvog, Daniel A. (2008): Introduction to Sumerian Grammar, Online: ANE Languages. En línea: <http://www.anelanguages.com/SumerianGrammarFoxvog. pdf> [21/01/2020].
Fraser, Norman y Corbett, Greville (1995). «Gender, animacy and declension- al class assignment: a unified account for Russian», en Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 1994 (pp. 123-50). Dordrecht, Kluwer.
Gardin Dumesnil, Jean Baptiste (1809): Latin Synonyms, with Their Different Significations, and Examples Taken from the Best Latin Authors, London, Rich- ard Taylor and Co.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa y Campbell, Lyle (2006): Grammar from the Human Perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Jiménez Ruiz, Juan Luis (1986): «Notas para una teoría de la explicación del significado connotativo», Analecta malacitana, 9 (2), pp. 407-418.
Jiménez Zamudio, Rafael (1998): Gramática de la lengua sumeria, Madrid, Ediciones clásicas.
Klenin, Emily (1983): Animacy in Russian: a new interpretation. UCLA Slavic Studies, 6. Columbus, Slavica.
[Krivonosov] Кривоносов, Алексей Тимофеевич (2012): Философия языка, Москва, Азбуковник.
Leech, Geoffrey N., Francis, Brian J. y Xu, Xunfeng (1994): «The use of computer corpora in the textual demonstrability of gradience in linguistic categories», en C. Fuchs & B. Victorri (eds.). Continuity in Linguistic Semantics (pp. 57-76), Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Lakoff, George (1987): Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Luqe Durán, Juan de Dios (2001): Aspectos universales y particulares del léxico de las lenguas del mundo, Granada, Método Ediciones.
McLaughlin, Brittany Dael (2014): «Animacy in Morphosyntactic Variation». Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations, 1365. En línea: [20/01/2020].
Marlett, Stephen A. (2012): «La Animacidad», en Stephen A. Marlett (ed.) Los Archivos Lingüísticos Me’phaa. SILInternational <http://www.sil.org/mexico/ workpapers/WP013-PDF/MephaaAnimacidad.pdf>.
[Maslova] Маслова, Валентина Авраамовна (2004): Лингвокульурология. 2-е изд., Москва, Academia.
Palmer, Frank Robert (1986): Mood and modality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
[Polinskaya] Полинская, Мария Семеновна (1995): Язык ниуэ, Москва, Восточная литература РАН.
Real Academia Española De La Lengua (2019): Diccionario panhispánico de dudas, Madrid, RAE. En línea: <http://www.rae.es/recursos/diccionarios/ dpd> [20/12/2019].
Rey, Joëlle (1999-2000): «Subjetividad y gradualidad en las relaciones lógicas», Sendebar, 10-11, pp. 185-198.
Roberts, Edward y Pastor, Bárbara (2009): Diccionario etimológico indoeuropeo de la lengua española, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.
Siemund, Peter (2011): Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, Berlin-New York, De Gruyter Mouton.
Simone, Raffaele y Masini, Francesca (2014): Word classes: nature, typology and representations, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
Sorlin, Sandrine y Gardelle, Laure (2018): «Anthropocentrism, egocentrism and the notion of Animacy Hierarchy», International Journal of Language and Culture, From Culture to Language and Back: The Animacy Hierarchy in language and discourse, 5 (2), En línea: <https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal- 01874511/document> [21/01/2020].
[Stepanov] Степанов, Юрий (2004): Константы: словарь русской культуры, 3-е изд. исправ. и дополн., Москва, Академический проект.
[Vol’f] ВОЛЬФ, Елена Моисеевна (2002): Функциональная семантика оценки. 2-е, изд., доп., Москва, УРСС.
[Vorob’ëv] Воробьёв, Владимир Васильевич (1994): Культурологическая парадигма русского языка: Теория описания языка во взаимодействии, Москва, Институт Русского Языка имени А.С. Пушкиня.
VV.AA. (2019): The free dictionary, Huntingdon Valley: Farlex. En línea <http://www.thefreedictionary.com> [15/12/2019).
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2017): Tractatus logico-philosophicus / Investigaciones filosóficas (traducción y edición de Isidoro Reguera Pérez), Madrid, Gredos.
Yamamoto, Mutsumi (1999): Animacy and reference: A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
Yip, Po-Ching y Rimmington, Don (2015): Gramática de la lengua china, Madrid, Cátedra.
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Linguistic Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the economic rights (copyright) of the published works, and favors and allows the reuse of same under the license of use indicated in point 2.
2. The papers are published in the electronic edition of the magazine under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 3.0 Spain license (legal text). Papers may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exhibited if the following requirements are met: i) The authorship and the original source of its publication (magazine, editorial and URL of the work) must be cited; ii) The works cannot be used for commercial purposes; iii) The existence and specifications of this user license must be explicitly mentioned.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors can electronically disseminate pre-print versions (version before being evaluated) and / or post-print versions (version evaluated and accepted for publication). This makes possible its circulation and diffusion earlier and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community. RoMEO color: green.
_15.00_.10_.png)
_15.11_.42_.png)
