Digital Art and Queer Temporalities

Analysis of the Works by Danielle Brathwaite-Shirley, Morehshin Allahyari, and Heesoo Kwon

Authors

Keywords: temporalities, queer, digital art, archive, utopia

Abstract

Digital artworks allow us to visualize complex and abstract ideas. This article focuses on alternative epistemologies of time expressed through contemporary digital art. Its objective is to analyze how the work of Danielle Brathwaite-Shirley, Morehshin Allahyari, and Heesoo Kwon showcases queer temporalities opposed to cis-heterosexual and colonial chrono-normativity. To achieve this, it begins by theoretically describing Western temporal worldviews. It then explores critical approaches to these worldviews from queer theories and concepts such as “archive” and “utopia.” The theoretical review serves as a foundation for the analysis of the pieces in the exhibition, consisting of seven works by the mentioned artists. The analysis of each piece is presented individually, organized by each artist. The conclusions discuss the pieces collectively. The results reveal a tension between the concepts of “archive” and “utopia,” simultaneously present in the analyzed pieces. Consequently, the article proposes new conceptual frameworks that allow understanding them beyond the dichotomous division of these terms: “blutopias” (following Keeling) and interventionist “hauntologies” (following Fisher).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bernini, L. (2015). Apocalipsis queer: Elementos de teoria antisocial (Albert Tola, Trad.). Editorial Egales.

Bersani, L. (1987). Is the Rectum a Grave? October, 43, 197. https://doi.org/10.2307/3397574

Bersani, L. (1995). Homos. Harvard University Press.

Boellstorff, T. (2010). Queer techne: Two theses on methodology and queer studies. En C. J. Nash & K. Browne (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (pp. 215-230). Routledge.

Brummett, B. (2019). Techniques of close reading (2.a ed.). SAGE.

Butler, J. (1993). Critically queer. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 1(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-1-1-17

Carrascosa, S., Platero, L., Senra, A., & Vila Núñez, F. (2015). ¿Archivo Queer? Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía.

Chen, J. N., & cárdenas, micha. (2019). Times to Come. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 6(4), 472-480. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-7771639

Cvetkovich, A. (2018). Un archivo de sentimientos: Trauma, sexualidad y culturas públicas lesbianas (J. Sáez, Trad.). Bellaterra.

Cvetkovich, A., Frantz, D. E., & Locks, M. (Eds.). (2011). Cruising the archive: Queer art and culture in Los Angeles, 1945-1980. ONE National Gay & Lesbian Archives.

Dean, T. (2011). Bareback time. En E. L. McCallum & M. Tuhkanen (Eds.), Queer Times, Queer Becomings (pp. 75-100). State University of New York Press.

Derrida, J. (1997). Mal de archivo: Una impresión freudiana. Trotta.

Dinshaw, C. (2007). Temporalities. En P. Strohm (Ed.), Middle English (pp. 197-223). Oxford University Press.

Dinshaw, C., Edelman, L., Ferguson, R. A., Freccero, C., Freeman, E., Halberstam, J., Jagose, A., Nealon, C., & Hoang, N. T. (2007). Theorizing Queer Temporalities. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 13(2-3), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2006-030

Edelman, L. (2014). No al futuro: La teoría queer y la pulsión de muerte (J. Sáez & A. Baschuk, Trads.). Editorial Egales.

Farrier, S. (2013). It’s about Time: Queer Utopias and Theater Performance. En A. Jones (Ed.), A Critical Inquiry into Queer Utopias (pp. 47-68). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311979_3

Fernandez, M., Wilding, F., & Wright, M. M. (Eds.). (2002). Domain errors! Cyberfeminist practices. Autonomedia.

Fisher, M. (2018). Realismo capitalista. ¿No hay alternativa? (C. Iglesias, Trad.). Caja Negra.

Freeman, E. (2010). Time binds: Queer temporalities, queer histories. Duke University Press.

Halberstam, J. (2005). In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York University Press.

Haraway, D. J. (2019). Las promesas de los monstruos: Ensayos sobre ciencia, naturaleza y otros inadaptables (J. Fernández Gonzalo, Trad.; Primera edición). Holobionte Ediciones.

Hart, T. (2020). Dining on trauma: Danielle Brathwaite-Shirley talks trans-tourism, motherhood, & being a ‘Freaky Friday everyday’. AQNB. https://www.aqnb.com/2020/08/10/dining-on-trauma-danielle-brathwaite-shirley-on-trans-tourism-motherhood-and-being-a-freaky-friday-everyday/

Hartman, S. (2008). Venus in Two Acts. Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism, 12(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1215/-12-2-1

Haschemi Yekani, E., Kilian, E., & Michaelis, B. (Eds.). (2016). Queer Futures: Reconsidering Ethics, Activism, and the Political (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603193

Honig, B. (2021). A feminist theory of refusal. Harvard University Press.

Hui, Y. (2020). Fragmentar el futuro: Ensayos sobre tecnodiversidad (T. Lima, Trad.). Caja Negra.

Kaplinsky, H. (2023). Caring for ‘Range-ful’ Identities in the Work of Danielle Brathwaite-Shirley. En E. Krasny & L. Perry (Eds.), Curating with Care. Routledge.

Keeling, K. (2019). Queer times, black futures. New York University Press.

Khanna, S., & Brathwaite-Shirley, D. (2021). Interview with Danielle Brathwaite-Shirley by Flatness for Feminist Review and Women’s Art Library, April 2021. Feminist Review, 129(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/01417789211037031

Kwet, M. (2019). Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South. Race & Class, 60(4), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172

Lefanu, S. (1989). Feminism and science fiction. Indiana University Press.

Luciano, D. (2007). Arranging grief: Sacred time and the body in nineteenth-century America. New York University Press.

Martínez-Carrasco, R., & Báez-Humanes, R. (2023). Localizar lo queer: Una lectura demasiado atenta de Undertale. Mutatis Mutandis. Revista Latinoamericana de Traducción, 16(1), 204-228. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.mut/v16n1a12

Munster, A. (2006). Materializing new media: Embodiment in information aesthetics. Dartmouth College Press.

Muñoz, J. E. (2020). Utopía queer: El entonces y allí de la futuridad antinormativa (P. Orellana & M. López Seoane, Trads.). Caja Negra.

Nothias, T. (2022). How to Fight Digital Colonialism. Boston Review. https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/how-to-fight-digital-colonialism/

Phillips, R. (2015). Black Quantum Futurism: Theory & practice. AfroFuturist Affair, House of Future Science Books.

Pinto, R. Á. (2018). ¿Soberanía digital o colonialismo digital? Nuevas tendencias alrededor de la privacidad, la seguridad y las políticas nacionales. Sur. Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos, 15(27), 15-28.

Plant, S. (1997). Zeroes + ones: Digital women + the new technoculture (1.a ed.). Doubleday.

Pratt, L. (2011). Close Reading the Present: Eudora Welty’s Queer Politics. En E. L. McCallum & M. Tuhkanen (Eds.), Queer Times, Queer Becomings (pp. 183-204). State University of New York Press.

Quiroga, J. (2003). From Republic to Empire: The Loss of Gay Studies. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 10(1), 133-137. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-10-1-133

Rawson, K. J. (2022). The trans rhetorical practice of archive building. En J. Rhodes & J. Alexander (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Queer Rhetoric (1.a ed., pp. 77-84). Routledge.

Russell, L. (2022). Feminismo Glitch: Un manifiesto (F. Fernández Gordiano, Trad.; 1.a ed.). Holobionte Ediciones.

Sedgwick, E. K. (1993). Tendencies. Duke University Press.

Smurthwaite, J. (2022). Danielle Brathwaite-Shirley: She Keeps Me Damn Alive. Art Monthly, 453, 30-31.

Thomas, S. A. (2022). Danielle Brathwaite-Shirley. Frieze 231, 68-77.

Vallette, J. (2020). Gaming, Visibility and Black Trans Experience: An Interview with Danielle Brathwaite-Shirley. Berlin Art Link. https://www.berlinartlink.com/2020/08/14/gaming-visibility-and-black-trans-experience-an-interview-with-danielle-brathwaite-shirley/

Published
30-07-2024
How to Cite
Blanco-Fernández, V. (2024). Digital Art and Queer Temporalities: Analysis of the Works by Danielle Brathwaite-Shirley, Morehshin Allahyari, and Heesoo Kwon. Art and Identity Policies, 31, 68–82. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/reapi/article/view/592981