A Dive into Nature for the Artistic Creation of Journeys and Maps

Artistic projects of the Ecoarte

Authors

  • Karla Brunet UFDA Universidadde Federal da Bahia, Brasil
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/reapi.389461
Keywords: Map, Art, Nature, Journey, Environment

Abstract

This paper presents the research and artistic practice of the Ecoarte Group, UFBA/Brazil, focusing on projects that workespecially with seas and rivers. They are immersions in naturethat seek to discuss and reflect on our territory, place and how we represent it in maps and artistic works. The results of these experiences in nature are as diverse as possible: interactive installations, citizen science, environmental sensors, interactive online mapping, artistic residence on a sailboat, audiovisual performance, island walks, and audiovisual cartography. It is the report of an empirical artistic theoretical research in search of an environmental aesthetic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aceti, L. (2016). Meanderings and Reflections on Locative Art. Leonardo Electronic Almanac, 21(1).

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London; New York: Verso.

Bolt, B. (2007). Sensorium: aesthetics, art, life. Newcastle, U.K.: Cambridge Scholars Pub.

Bondia, J. L. (2002). Notas sobre a experiência e o saber de experiência. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 41(19), 20–28.

Carlson, A. (2002). Aesthetics and the environment: the appreciation of nature, art, and architecture. London; New York: Routledge.

Cresswell, T. (2006). On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. New York, London: Routledge.

Cubitt, S. (2009). El camino (no camino). In Ana Botella Diez del Corral (Ed.), There is no road. The road is made by walking. Gijón: Laboral.

Evans, D. (2012). The Art of Walking: A Field Guide. London: Black Dog Publishing.

Grande, J. K. (2004). Art Nature Dialogues: Interviews with Environmental Artists. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.

Harmon, K. A. (2004). You are here: personal geographies and other maps of the imagination (1st ed.). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Harrison, S. y Dourish, P. (1996). Re-Place-ing Space: The Roles of Place and Space in Collaborative Systems.

Jones, C. A. y Arning, B. (2006). Sensorium: embodied experience, technology, and contemporary art (1st MIT Pr.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press: The MIT List Visual Arts Center.

Lippard, L.R. (1997). The Lure of the Local: Senses of Place in a Multicentered Society. New York: The New Press.

Lipton, A. y Watts, P. (2004). Ecoart: ecological art. In H. Strelow & V. David (Eds.), Ecological aesthetics. Art in environmental design: theory and practice. Basel; Boston: Birkhauser.

Machado, A. (2007). Arte e mídia. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.

McWilliam, A. (2008). Developing an Environmental Aesthetics: Aesthetics and the Outdoor Experience. In G. Coutts & T. Jokela (Eds.), Art, Community and Environment. Bristol, UK; Chicago, USA: Intellect Books.

Mogel, L. y Bhagat, A. (2008). An Atlas of Radical Cartography. Los Angeles, CA: Journal of Aesthetics & Protest Press.

O’Rourke, K. (2016). Walking and Mapping. Artists as Cartographers. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: MIT Press.

Santos, M. (1988). Metamorfoses do Espaço Habitado: Fundamentos Teóricos e Metodológicos da Geografia. São Paulo: Hucitec.

Sheller, M. y Iverson, H. (2016). L.A. Re.Play: Mobile Network Culture in Placemaking. Leonardo Electronic Almanac, 21(1).

Thompson, N. (2008). Experimental geography. New York: Melville House; Independent Curators International.

Thoreau, H. D. (2004). Walking. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing.

Tuan, Y.-F. (1990). Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. New York: Columbia University Press.

Turchi, P. (2004). Maps of the imagination: the writer as cartographer. San Antonio, Texas: Trinity University Press.

Published
13-07-2019
How to Cite
Brunet, K. (2019). A Dive into Nature for the Artistic Creation of Journeys and Maps: Artistic projects of the Ecoarte. Art and Identity Policies, 20, 29–48. https://doi.org/10.6018/reapi.389461