Distance learning and academic performance in accounting: a comparative study of the effect of the use of videoconferencing
Educación a distancia y resultados académicos en contabilidad: un estudio comparativo del uso de videoconferencia
Abstract
Background The specific needs of some universities (attending several campuses), as well as the demands of adapting to the EHEA (in order to achieve better coordination among universities in joint programmes and projects) could be efficiently solved by using Information and Communication Technologies and distance learning tools. In this context, the efficiency of such solutions is a relevant question. Aims The evaluation of the relative efficacy, in terms of academic performance, of videoconferencing in the teaching of accounting at university level. Method A large dataset, including current academic performance, previous academic performance and other relevant factors, for students in groups using videoconferencing and traditional methods was built. Multivariate analyses were performed in order to test whether students at videoconferencing groups presented significant differences in performance. Results The results indicated that videoconferencing does not negatively affect students’ performances.
Downloads
-
Abstract304
-
PDF246
References
[Allen et al., 2002] M. Allen, J. Bourhis, N. Burrell, E. Mabry. Comparing Student Satisfaction with Distance Education to Traditional Classrooms in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (2002), pp. 83-97
[Allen et al., 2004] M. Allen, E. Mabry, M. Mattrey, J. Bourhis, S. Titsworth, N. Burrell. Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: a comparison using meta-analysis. Journal of Communication. September, (2004), pp. 402-420
[Basom and Sherritt, 1992] M. Basom, C. Sherritt. Higher education problems in the twenty-first century: A survey of higher education administrators and politicians. Paper presented at the Annual Conference for International Higher Education Administrators,
[Bernard et al., 2004] R.M. Bernard, P.C. Abrami, Y. Lou, E. Borokhovski, A. Wade, L. Wozney, P.A. Wallet, M. Fiset, B. Huang. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction?. A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74 (2004), pp. 379-439
[Cabero, J-Dir., 1999] J.-Dir. Cabero. Tecnología educativa. Síntesis, (1999)
[Cabero, 2000] J. Cabero. La videoconferencia como instrumento educativo (p. 97-110). Nuevas tecnologías aplicadas a la educación,
[Craz Declaration by the European University Association, 2003] Craz Declaration by the European University Association (2003). Retrieved from: . in press.
[Declaration of the Conference of European Ministers in charge of Higher Education et al., 2002] Declaration of the Conference of European Ministers in charge of Higher Education et al., Declaration of the Conference of European Ministers in charge of Higher Education, Prague.2002 http://www.mec.es/univ/index.html
[Declaration of the Conference of European Ministers in charge of Higher Education et al., 2003] Declaration of the Conference of European Ministers in charge of Higher Education, Berlin (2003) Retrieved from: . in press.
[Declaration of the Conference on European Ministers in charge of Higher Education et al., 2005] Declaration of the Conference on European Ministers in charge of Higher Education, Bergen (2005) Retrieved from: . in press.
[Declaration of the Convention of European Institutions of Higher Education et al., 2001] Declaration of the Convention of European Institutions of Higher Education Salamanca (2001) Retrieved from: http://www.mec.es/univ/index.html
[Christensen et al., 2001] E.W. Christensen, U.P. Anakwe, E.H. Kessler. Receptivity to distance learning: the effect of technology reputation, constraints, and learning preferences. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33 (2001), pp. 263-279
[Bologna Declaration, 1999] Bologna Declaration (1999). Retrieved from: http://www.mec.es/univ/index.html
[Sorbonne Declaration, 1998] Sorbonne Declaration (1998). Retrieved from: http://www.mec.es/univ/index.html
[London Declaration, 2007] London Declaration (2007). Retrieved from: http://www.mec.es/univ/index.html
[Evans, 2008] C. Evans. The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers, & Education, 50 (2008), pp. 491-498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.090503
[Fernández et al., 2009] V. Fernández, P. Simo, J. Sallan. Podcasting: A new technological tool to facilitate good practice in higher education. Computers, & Education, 53 (2009), pp. 385-392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.090503
[Fillion et al., 1999] G. Fillion, M. Limayen, L. Bouchard. Videoconferencing in distance education: A study of student perceptions in lecture context. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 36 (1999), pp. 302-319
[Freeman, 1998] M. Freeman. Video conferencing: a solution to the multi-campus large classes problem?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29 (1998), pp. 197-210
[Greene, 1996] H.G. Greene. Análisis Econométrico. (3ª), Prentice Hall, (1996)
[Gujarati, 1997] D.N. Gujarati. Econometría. (3ª), Mc Graw Hill, (1997)
[Horgan, 1998] B. Horgan. Transforming higher education using information technology: first steps. (On-Line), (1998),
[Isla et al., 2001] Isla, J.L., & Ortega, F.D. (2001). Consideraciones para la implantación de la videoconferencia en el aula. Píxel-Bit, 17. Retrieved from: http://www.sav.us.es/pixelbit/pixelbit/marco abj17.htm
[Jaeger, 1995] M. Jaeger. Science teacher education at a distance. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9 (1995), pp. 61-75
[Keegan, 1995] D. Keegan. Distance education technology for the new millennium: compressed video teaching. ZIFF Papiere. Hagen, Germany: Institute for Research into Distance Education, (1995),
[Keegan, 1980] D.J. Keegan. On defining distance education. Distance Education, 1 (1980), pp. 13-36
[Kerr and Hiltz, 1982] E.B. Kerr, S.R. Hiltz. Computer-mediated communication systems. Academic, (1982)
[Köymen, 1992] U. Köymen. Comparison of learning and study strategies of traditional and openlearning- system students in Turkey. Distance Education, 13 (1992), pp. 108-117
[Merisotis and Phipps, 1999] J. Merisotis, R. Phipps. May/June: Whats the difference?. Outcomes of distance vs. traditional classroom-based learning. Change, 12 (1999), pp. 13-20
[Moore and Thompson, 1997] M.G. Moore, M.M. Thompson. The effects of distance learning (Rev. ed.). (ACSDE Research Monograph No. 15). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University. American Center for the Study of Distance Education, (1997),
[Oliver, 1995] M. Oliver. La videoconferencia en el campo educativo. Técnicas y procedimientos. Paper presented at Edutec Conference (Palma de Mallorca), (1995),
[Otero, 1993] J.M. Otero. Econometría: Series temporales y predicción. Editorial AC, (1993)
[Salinas, 2002] J. Salinas. Efectos de la introducción de las TIC en la mejora de la docencia universitaria. Paper presented at the 2° Congreso Internacional de Docencia Universitaria e Innovación,
[Sánchez, 2001] E. Sánchez. Integración de la videoconferencia en la educación a distancia. Píxel-Bit, 17, (2001),
[Sevillano and Sánchez, 1997] M.ª.L. Sevillano, E. Sánchez. El sistema de videoconferencia en la Universidad Nacional a Distancia: contraste de opiniones. Paper presented at Edutec Conference 1997 (Málaga), (1997),
[Spooner et al., 1999] F. Spooner, L. Jordan, B. Algozzine, M. Spooner. Student Ratings of Instruction in Distance Learning and On-Campus Classes. The Journal of Educational Research, 92 (1999), pp. 132-140
[Urbina and Forteza, 2001] S. Urbina, D. Forteza. Videoconferencia en la enseñanza universitaria y cambio del rol en el profesorado. Paper presented at Edutec Conference 2001. (Murcia), (2001),
[Valentine, 2002] D. Valentine. Distance Learning: Promises, Problems, and Possibilities. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume V. Number III, Fall 2002, (2002),
[Webster and Hackley, 1997] J. Webster, P. Hackley. Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1997), pp. 1282-1309
The publications in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) and ASEPUC conserve the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published manuscripts, and favour and allow their reuse under the licence of use indicated in point 2.
2. The manuscripts are published in the electronic edition of the journal under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. It allows to copy, distribute and include the article in a collective work (for example, an anthology), as long as there is no commercial purpose, the article is not altered or modified and the original work is properly cited. This journal is free of charge for the Open Access publication. ASEPUC and EDITUM finance the productiona and publication costs of the manuscripts.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are permitted and encouraged to electronically disseminate the published version of their works, as it favors their circulation and dissemination and thus a possible increase in their citation and reach among the academic community.

