Female genital mutilation: quantitative estimation of the problem in the European Union and qualitative analysis of its approach in Ireland, Italy, Spain and Sweden
Abstract
This paper is part of the results achieved by the Project “AFTER project, Against FGM/C Through Empowerment and Rejection” co-funded by the EU Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme and implemented by a multidisciplinary Research Group based on Ireland, Italy, Sweden and Spain. Purposes: a) to describe the elements, types, consequences of female genital mutilation (FGM/C) and the reasons behind this; b) to estimate the population who are from countries where FGM/C is practised and are resident in the EU; and c) to know the opinions of some stakeholders on policies, services, resources and campaigns to address FGM/C.
A mixed methodology: We used quantitative approach to analyse data obtained from secondary sources aims to estimate how many women and girls have suffered or are at risk of suffering FGM/C. And qualitative to analyse the discourse of the interviewed professionals. Results: The statistical analysis shows that the population from countries where FGM/C practised has increased in recent years. And the analysis of expert discourse shows agreement that is needed legislation to penalize the practice, but insufficient. It is necessary to developed prevention and comprehensive care measures for victims and inter-institutional coordination protocols, involving the participation of the affected communities. Professionals insist that relevant training is fundamental and ask for more resources and services, in addition to the creation of multidisciplinary teams. Conclusions: FGM/C is today practised globally, whether due to tradition or immigration and eradicating it, requires engaging in real work to integrate the immigrant population and attend to its basic needs.
Downloads
References
BALACHANDRAN, Aswini, DUVALLA, Swapna, SULTAN, Abdul H. & THAKAR, Ranee (2018): “Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation?” International Urogymecology Journal, 29, pp. 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3466-5
BEHRENDT, Alice & MORITZ, Steffen (2005): “Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Memory Problems After Female Genital Mutilation”. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, pp. 1000-1002.
BERG, Rigmor C., DENISON, Eva & FRETHEIM, Atle (2010): “Psychological, Social and Sexual Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies”. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services,13. https://www.fhi.no/globalassets/dokumenterfiler/rapporter/2010/rapport_2010_13_fgmc_kjonnslemlestelse.pdf
BERG, Rigmor C., ODGAARD-JENSEN, Jan, FRETHEIM, Atle, UNDERLAND, Vigdis. & VIST, G. (2014): “An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Obstetric Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting”. Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2014; https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/542859
BROWNING, Andrew, ALLSWORTH, Jenifer E., and WALL, L.Lewis (2010): “The relationship between Female Genital Cutting and Obstetric Fistulas”. Obstet Gynecol, 115(3), pp. 578-583.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Toward the elimination of female genital mutilation (2013): (COM/2013/0833final) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52013DC0833
Council of Europe (2011): “Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention)”. https://www.coe.int/en/web/gender-matters/council-of-europe-convention-on-preventing-and-combating-violence-against-women-and-domestic-violence
European Parliament (2001). “Resolution on female genital mutilation (2001/2035(INI)”. Official Journal of the European Communities. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5dd0b2f0-1a46-421c-8fc8-4c2e5040beb2
European Parliament (2014): “Resolution of 24 March 2009 on combating female genital mutilation in the EU (2008/2071(INI))”. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52009IP0161
European Parliament (2012): “Resolution of 14 June 2012 on ending female genital mutilation (2012/2684(RSP))”. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-ontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52012IP0261
EUROSTAT (2019). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
GEBREMICHEAL, Kiros, ALEMSEGED, Fisehaye, EWUNETU, Haimanot, TOLOSSA, Daniel, MA’ALIN, Abdibari, YEWONDEWESSEN, Mahlet & MELAKU, Samuel (2018): “Sequela of female genital mutilation on birth outcomes in Jijiga town, Ethiopian Somali region: a prospective cohort study”. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 18 (305). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1937-4
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2019). www.ine.es
ISA, Rahman, SHUIB, Rashidah & OTHMAN, M. Shukri (1999): “The Practice of Female Circumcision among Muslims in Kelantan, Malaysia”. Reproductive Health Matters, 7(13), pp. 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(99)90125-8
ISMAIL, Asha, De DIOS, Begoña & GASCÓN, María (2015): Prevención y erradicación de la mutilación genital femenina. Manual para la intervención social con un enfoque intercultural y de género. Madrid, Acción en Red & Save a Girl, Save a Generation.
KNIPSCHEER, Jeroen, VLOEBERGHS, Erick, KWAAK, Anke & MUIJSENBERGH, Maria (2015): “Mental health problems associated with female genital mutilation”. BJPsych Bulletin; 39(6), pp. 273–277.
KAPLAN, Adriana, TORÁN, Peré, BERMÚDEZ, Kira & CASTANY, Mª José (2006): “Las mutilaciones genitales femeninas en España: Posibilidades de prevención desde los ámbitos de la atención primaria de salud, la educación y los servicios sociales”. Migraciones, 19, pp. 189-217.
LAVAZZO, Christos, SARDI, Thalia A., & GKEGKES, Ioannis D. (2013): “Female genital mutilation and infections: a systematic review of the clinical evidence”. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 287, pp. 1137-1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2708-5
LUJAN, Yusimi & BETANCOURT, Pablo Ricardo (2014). “Mutilación genital femenina y sus complicaciones a largo plazo”. Revista Humanidades Médicas, 14 (3), pp. 602-614. http://ref.scielo.org/tcr22h
MESTRE i MESTRE, Ruth (2011): “La mutilación genital femenina (MGF) en el contexto europeo: qué se ha hecho y qué se puede hacer”. In Ricardo Rodríguez & Encarna Bodelón, Las violencias machistas contra las mujeres, pp. 57-74. Barcelona, Bellaterra
PHILLIPS, Anne y DUSTIN, Moira (2004): “UK initiatives on forced marriage: regulation, dialogue and exit”. Political Studies, 52 (3), pp. 531-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00494.x
REISEL, Dan & CREIGHTON, Sarah M. (2015): “Long term health consequences of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)”. Maturitas, 80(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.10.009http://www.jstor.org/stable/3775716
RUSHWAN, Hamid. (2013): “Female genital mutilation: a tragedy for women’s reproductive health”. African Journal of Urology, 19, pp. 130-133
SEROUR, Gamal I. (2010): “The issue of reinfibulation”. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 109(2), pp. 93-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.01.001
SEROUR, Gamal I. (2013): “Medicalization of female genital mutilation/cutting”. African Journal of Urology 19, pp. 145–149
SYLLA, Fatoumata, MOREAU, Caroline & ANDRO, Armelle (2020): “A systematic review and meta-analysis of the consequences of female genital mutilation on maternal and perinatal health outcomes in European and Africans countries”. BMJ Global Health, 5. https://gh.bmj.com/content/5/12/e003307
UN (2015a). Sustainable Development Goals. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/summit/
UN (2015b). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution Adopted by General Assembly on 25 September 2015, 42809, 1-13.
UNAF (2015): Guía para profesionales. La MGF en España. Prevención e intervención. Madrid, UNAF-Unión Nacional de Asociaciones Familiares.
UNICEF (2016): Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Global Concern. http://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/FGMC-2016-brochure_250.pdf
UNPFA (2016). Ending Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and Chid Marriage. The Role of Parlamentarians. https://kenya.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/UNFPA-PAP%20Workshop%20on%20Ending%20FGM%20-%20FINAL%20Report%20%281%29.pdf
VLOEBERGHS, Erick, van der KWAAK, Anke, KNIPSCHEER, Jeroen, & van den MUIJSENBERGH, Maria (2012). “Coping and chronic psychosocial consequences of female genital mutilation in the Netherlands”. Ethnicity Health, 17, pp. 677-95, 10.1080/13557858.2013.771148
WHO (1979): Seminar on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/14505
WHO (2008): Eliminating female genital mutilation: An interagency statement, http://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/documents/publications/2008/eliminating_fgm.pdf
WHO (2018): Classification of female genital mutilation. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/overview/es/
Copyright (c) 2024 Areas. International Social Science Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
The published works by this Journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publication Service of the University of Murcia (the Editor) owns the copyright of its publications. It promotes and allows its use under the indicated licence in Section 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2011
2. Papers are digitally published under the licence Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal text). They can be copied, used, disseminated, transferred and publically presented if: i) the author is quoted, as well as the original source of publication (Journal, editorial and URL); ii) they are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the licence of use is mentioned.
3. Auto-file Conditions. It is allowed and authors are encouraged to digitally disseminate their pre-print versions (versions prior to review) and/or post-print (reviewed version accepted for its publication) since it promotes its early diffusion and the corresponding increase of quotes and scope within the academic community. RoMEO Colour: green.
