EVALUATION OF THE STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF THE TIBIA IN TPC2KO GENETICALLY EDITED PIGS

Authors

  • Nardy Celeste Flores Bolaños Departamento de Fisiología. Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia
  • María Dolores Barceló Campoy Departamento de Fisiología. Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0361-8063
  • Joaquín Jerónimo Gadea Mateos Departamento de Fisiología. Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-7626
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesvet.712881
Keywords: TPC2, gene-edited pigs, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), bone remodeling

Supporting Agencies

  • Fundación Séneca–Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Región de Murcia

Abstract

Bone tissue is a dynamic system regulated by the balance between bone formation and resorption, processes in which intracellular calcium signaling plays a crucial role. The lysosomal ion channel TPC2 is involved in these mechanisms, particularly in osteoclastogenesis, although its role in porcine models remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of TPC2 gene deletion on bone structure and composition in the tibia of genetically edited pigs (TPC2KO) compared to wild-type (WT) controls. Tibias from 12 animals (6 per group) were analysed using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), cortical texture analysis (GLCM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX). Micro-CT results showed that TPC2KO animals had significantly increased bone volume, bone volume fraction (BV/TV), and trabecular thickness. No significant differences were found in trabecular spacing or connectivity indices. SEM observations revealed a more compact and homogeneous cortical structure in KO animals, which was supported by GLCM analysis indicating reduced structural complexity. Elemental analysis showed a significant increase in magnesium content in TPC2KO animals, while calcium and phosphorus levels remained unchanged. This suggests a less mature and more dynamic mineralization process. Overall, TPC2 deletion alters both bone microarchitecture and mineral composition, likely due to changes in osteoclastogenesis and calcium signaling. These findings highlight the relevance of the TPC2KO porcine model for studying bone physiology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    205
  • pdf (Español (España))
    44

References

1. Barceló, M. D., García-García, M. I., Pardo Fernández, F. J., Quintero, A., Cano Davó, J. A., Piñero Silva, C., & Gadea, J. (2025, noviembre 18–21). Evaluación de la estructura ósea del fémur mediante microtomografía computarizada en modelos porcinos TPC2KO. XVIII Congreso Nacional SECAL, Bilbao, España.

2. Barceló, M. D., Navarro-Serna, S., Piñeiro Silva, C., Fernández-Martín, I., Crespo, S., Briski, O., Parrington, J., & Gadea, J. (2023). Manejo y rendimiento reproductivo de una colonia de cerdos knock out para el gen TPC2 en heterosis. En XX Jornadas de Producción Animal AIDA (p. 218). Zaragoza, España.

3. Ben-Zvi, Y., Reznikov, N., Shahar, R., & Weiner, S. (2017). 3D architecture of trabecular bone in the pig mandible and femur: Inter-trabecular angle distributions. Frontiers in Materials, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2017.00029

4. Braux, J., Jourdain, M. L., Guillaume, C., Untereiner, V., Piot, O., Baehr, A., Klymiuk, N., Winter, N., Berri, M., & Buzoni-Gatel, D. (2020). CFTR-deficient pigs display alterations of bone microarchitecture and composition at birth. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 19, 466–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2019.10.023

5. Bystrov, V. A., Komlev, V. S., Fedotov, A. Y., Kovalchuk, M. V., & Barinov, S. M. (2023). Magnesium substitution in hydroxyapatite: Experimental and DFT analysis. Materials, 16(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010135

6. Domander, R., Felder, A. A., & Doube, M. (2021). BoneJ2: Refactoring established research software (Version 2). Wellcome Open Research, 6. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16619.2

7. Doube, M., Kłosowski, M. M., Arganda-Carreras, I., Cordelières, F. P., Dougherty, R. P., Jackson, J. S., Schmid, B., Hutchinson, J. R., & Shefelbine, S. J. (2010). BoneJ: Free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. Bone, 47, 1076–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.08.023

8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2021). FAOSTAT database. https://faostat.fao.org/

9. Gadea, J., Navarro-Serna, S., Piñero-Silva, C., Quintero, A., Barceló, M. D., Crespo, S., Carrillo, J., Romero, J., García Olmo, D. C., Parrington, J., Romar, R., & Matás, C. (2024). Metodología para la generación de cerdos editados genéticamente. Animales de Laboratorio, 102.

10. Garbo, C., Locs, J., Dindune, A., Berzina-Cimdina, L., & Cimdins, R. (2020). Multi-ion substituted hydroxyapatite: Structural and mechanical correlations. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 15, 8359–8377. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S271977

11. García-Garduño, M. V., & Reyes-Gasga, J. (2006). La hidroxiapatita, su importancia en los tejidos mineralizados y su aplicación biomédica. TIP Revista Especializada en Ciencias Químico-Biológicas, 9(2), 90–95.

12. Hou, N., Du, X., & Wu, S. (2022). Advances in pig models of human diseases. Animal Model and Experimental Medicine, 5, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/ame2.12214

13. Lagostena, L., Minicozzi, V., Meucci, M., Gradogna, A., Milenkovic, S., Palombi, F., Ceccarelli, M., Filippini, A., & Carpaneto, A. (2025). The two-pore channel 2 in human physiology and diseases: Functional characterisation and pharmacology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199708

14. Londoño-Restrepo, S. M., Millán-Montero, M., & Rodríguez-García, M. E. (2019). Comparative study of biogenic hydroxyapatite obtained from bovine, porcine, and human bones: Thermal stability, crystallinity, and chemical composition. Scientific Reports, 9, 8240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44717-6

15. Luthje, F. L., Skovgaard, K., Jensen, H. E., & Kruse Jensen, L. (2018). Pigs are useful for the molecular study of bone inflammation and regeneration in humans. Laboratory Animals, 52, 630–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677218766391

16. Navarro-Serna, S., Hachem, A., Canha-Gouveia, A., Hanbashi, A., Garrappa, G., Lopes, J. S., Paris-Oller, E., Sarrias-Gil, L., Flores-Flores, C., Bassett, A., Sánchez, R., Bermejo-Álvarez, P., Matás, C., Romar, R., Parrington, J., & Gadea, J. (2021). Generation of nonmosaic, two-pore channel 2 biallelic knockout pigs in one generation by CRISPR-Cas9 microinjection before oocyte insemination. CRISPR Journal, 4, 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2020.0082

17. Notomi, T., Ezura, Y., & Noda, M. (2012). Identification of two-pore channel 2 as a novel regulator of osteoclastogenesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287, 35057–35064. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.357459

18. Notomi, T., Kuno, M., Hiyama, A., Nozaki, T., Ohura, K., Ezura, Y., & Noda, M. (2017). Role of lysosomal channel protein TPC2 in osteoclast differentiation and bone remodeling under normal and low-magnesium conditions. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 292, 20998–21010. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M117.817585

19. Notomi, T., Hiyama, A., & Nozaki, T. (2020). Establishment of RANKL-highly sensitive RAW264 subclones in accordance with high expression of TPC2. Journal of Translational Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.15761/JTS.1000266

20. Notomi, T., Kise, C., Kobayashi, R., Otsuka, M., Momota, Y., Ezura, Y., & Kawazoe, T. (2021). TPC1 and TPC2 promote osteoclastogenesis. Journal of Hard Tissue Biology, 30, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.30.333

21. Odgaard, A., & Gundersen, H. J. G. (1993). Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3D reconstructions. Bone, 14, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90245-6

22. Ribet, A. B. P., Ng, P. Y., & Pavlos, N. J. (2021). Membrane transport proteins in osteoclasts: The ins and outs. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 9, 644986. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.644986

23. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods, 9, 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089

24. Serre, C. M., Papillard, M., Chavassieux, P., Voegel, J. C., & Boivin, G. (1998). Influence of magnesium substitution on the physical properties of hydroxyapatite: XRD and FTIR studies. Biomaterials, 19(24), 2323–2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00118-5

25. Yavropoulou, M. P., & Yovos, J. G. (2008). Osteoclastogenesis: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions, 8(3), 204–216. PMID: 18799853.

Published
27-07-2026
How to Cite
Flores Bolaños, N. C., Barceló Campoy, M. D., & Gadea Mateos, J. J. (2026). EVALUATION OF THE STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF THE TIBIA IN TPC2KO GENETICALLY EDITED PIGS. Anales De Veterinaria De Murcia, 40. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesvet.712881
Issue
Section
Early Research (Academic Section)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.