Preschoolers’ Trust in Social Consensus Varies by Context: Conventional vs. Moral Domains
Supporting Agencies
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain (PSI2012-31477)
- Ministerio de Educación of Spain
- “José Castillejo” (JC2011-0268)
Abstract
Do young children give priority to following personal beliefs over the testimony of a majority group of adults that approves of social exclusion? Following current research on children’s preference for non-dissenters when learning the names for novel objects, this study investigated children’s preference for consensus opinion in two contexts: Interracial social exclusion among peers and novel object labeling. The goal was to examine the generalizability of preference for the opinion of non-dissenters in a socially relevant context. This study was conducted with 90 preschool children from the Spanish ethnic majority group. The findings revealed that participants sided with the consensus significantly less often in the social exclusion context than in the novel object labeling context. Moreover, young children did not defer to the opinion of a numerical consensus in the socially meaningful context when a group condoned the exclusion of a peer from a group activity, even when the peer was from an outgroup social category. Instead, participants agreed with a dissenter who claimed that it was not okay to exclude someone, despite the opposite opinion of a numerical majority. These results provide new information regarding children’s social knowledge development.
Downloads
References
Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Pelletier, J., & Ferrell, J. (2009). Children’s Group Nous: Understanding and applying peer exclusion within and between groups. Child Development, 80, 224-243. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01256.x
Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: 1. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Mono-graphs, 70 (9, Whole No. 416)
Bond, R., & Smith, P.B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137.
Chen, E. E, Corriveau, K.H., & Harris, P.L. (2011). Children are sociologists. Anales de Psicología, 27, 625-630.
Chen, E. E., Corriveau, K.H., & Harris, P.L. (2013). Children trust a consensus composed of outgroup members—but do not retain that trust. Child Development, 84, 269-282. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01850.x
Cooley, S., & Killen, M. (2015). Children’s evaluations of resource allocation in the context of group norms. Developmental Psychology, 5, 554-563. doi: 10.1037/a0038796
Corriveau, K. H., Fusaro, M., & Harris, P.L. (2009). Going with the flow: Preschoolers prefer non-dissenters as informants. Psychological Sci-ence, 20, 372-377. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02291.x
Corriveau K. H., & Harris, P. L., (2010). Preschoolers (sometimes) defer to the majority in making simple perceptual judgments. Developmental Psychology, 46, 437-445. doi: 10.1037/a0017553
Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). From American city to Japanese village: A cross-cultural investigation of implicit race attitudes. Child Development, 77, 1268-1281.
Enesco, I., Guerrero, S., Callejas, C., & Solbes, I. (2008). Intergroup attitudes and reasoning about social exclusion in majority and minority children in Spain. In S. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 105-125). New York: Oxford University Press.
Enesco I, Lago O, Rodríguez P., & Guerrero S. (2011). 'We are the good guys but they are not bad'. In-group positivity and cognitive performance in preschoolers. British Journal Developmental Psychology. 29(3), 593-611.
Enesco, I., Sebastián-Enesco, C., Guerrero, S., Quan, S., & Garijo, S. (2016). What makes children defy majorities? The role of dissenters in Chinese and Spanish preschoolers’ social judgments. Fron-tiers in Psychology, 7, 1695. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01695
Einav, S., & Robinson, E. J. (2010). Children's sensitivity to error magnitude when evaluating informants. Cognitive Development, 25, 218-232. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.04.002
Fitneva, S. A., & Dunfield, K. A. (2010). Selective information seeking after a single encounter. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1380-1384. doi: 10.1037/a0019818
Fusaro, M., & Harris, P. L. (2008). Children assess informant reliability using bystanders' non-verbal cues. Developmental Science, 11, 771-777.
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1085-1108. doi: 10.1037/ a0028044
Guerrero, S., Cascado, C., Sausa, M., & Enesco, I. (2017). My teacher is wrong: Preschoolers’ opposition to non-conventional statements. Manuscript accepted for publication in Early Childhood Research Quarterly.
Guerrero, S., Enesco, I., Lago, O., & Rodríguez, P. (2010). Preschool children’s understanding of racial cues in drawings and photo-graphs. Cognitive Development, 25, 79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.07.001
Guerrero, S., Enesco, I., & Pons, R. M. (Eds.) (2011). Social and Develop-mental Aspects of Prejudice during Childhood and Adolescence [Guest Editors, Monograph Issue]. Anales de Psicología, 27, (3).
Haun, D., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Conformity to peer pressure in preschool children. Child Development, 82, 1759–1767. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01666.x
Harris, P. L. (2012). Trusting what you’re told: How children learn from others. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
Jaswal, V. K. (2010). Believing what you’re told: Young children’s trust in unexpected testimony about the physical world. Cognitive Psy-chology, 61, 248-272. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.06.002
Jaswal, V. K., Carrington Croft, A., Setia, A. R., & Cole, C. A. (2010). Young children have a specific, highly robust bias to trust testimony. Psychological Science, 21, 1541-1547. doi: 10.1177/0956797610383438
Jetten, J., & Hornsey, M. (2014). Deviance and dissent in groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 461-485. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115151
Killen, M., & Rutland, A. (2011). Children and exclusion: Morality, prejudice, and group identity. New York: Wiley/Blackwell Publishers.
Killen, M., & Smetana, J.G. (2015). Origins and development of morality. In R.M. Lerner & M. E. Lamb (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Vol. 3, 7th edition (pp. 701-749). NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
Killen, M., & Stangor, C. (2001). Children’s social reasoning about inclusion and exclusion in gender and race peer group contexts. Child Development, 72, 174–186.
Kinzler, K.D., Corriveau, K.H., & Harris, P.L. (2011). Preschoolers’ use of accent when deciding which informant to trust. Developmental Science, 14, 106-111.
Koenig, M. A. (2012). Beyond semantic accuracy: Preschoolers evaluate a speaker’s reasons. Child Development, 83, 1051-1063. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01742.x
Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development, 76, 1261-1277.
Levy, S.R., & Killen, M. (Eds.). (2008). Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Honorable Mention, Otto Klineberg Intercultural and In-ternational Relations Prize, from the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI)
McGlothlin, H., & Killen, M. (2005). Children’s perceptions of intergroup and intragroup similarity and the role of social experience. Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 680–698. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2005.08.008
Mills, C. M. (2013). Knowing when to doubt: Developing a critical stance when learning from others. Developmental Psychology, 49, 404-418. doi: 10.1037/a0029500
Nucci, L. P. (2001). Education in the moral domain. New York, NY US: Cambridge University Press.
Nucci, L. P. (2002). The development of moral reasoning. In U. Gos-wami (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. (pp. 303-325). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of the reality of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Rutland, A., Cameron, L., Bennett, L., & Ferrell, J. (2005). Interracial contact and racial constancy: A multi-site study of racial inter-group bias in 3-5 year old Anglo-British children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 699-713.
Rutland, A., & Killen, M. (2015). A developmental science approach to reducing prejudice and social exclusion: Intergroup processes, social-cognitive development, and moral reasoning. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 121-154.
Seston Schillaci, R., & Kelemen, D. (2014). Children’s conformity when acquiring novel conventions: The case of artifacts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 569-583 doi: 10.1080/15248372.2013.784973
Shutts, K., Banaji, M. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2010). Social categories guide young children’s preferences for novel objects. Developmental Science, 13, 599–610.
Slobin, D. I. (2001). Form/function relations: How do children find out what they are? In M. Tomasello & E. Bates (Eds.), Language development: The essential readings (pp. 267-289). Malden: Blackwell Pub-lishing.
Smetana, J. G. (1985). Preschool children's conceptions of transgressions: The effects of varying moral and conventional domain-related attributes. Developmental Psychology, 21, 18-29. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.21.1.18
Smetana, J.G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. (2014). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen & J.G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Development (pp. 23-45). New York: Psychology Press.
Theimer, C. E., Killen, M., & Stangor, C. (2001). Young children's evaluations of exclusion in gender-stereotypic peer contexts. Develop-mental Psychology, 37, 18-27.
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context, and conflict. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Turiel, E. (1998). The development of morality. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg , Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 863 – 932). New York: Wiley.
Walker, M. B., & Andrade, M. G. (1996). Conformity in the Asch task as a function of age. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 367–372.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.
