Analysis of the role of motivating operations in the therapeutic verbal interaction
Abstract
The concept of motivating operation (MO) helps to overcome both theoretical and practical problems of the traditional notion of motivation in the study of the therapeutic process. In this research, the role of three types of therapists’ verbalizations with an MO function was analyzed, in addition to their association with clients’ verbal behavior. For this purpose, recordings of 40 clinical sessions belonging to 9 different cases were observed. The ACOVEO System was the observational category system used to identify the therapists’ verbal MOs coded as MO with clinical information, MO with consequences, and MO with pairings. The SISC-CVC was the one used to identify clients’ verbalizations coded as Agreement and Disagreement. Sequential analyses were performed to test the relation between the three different types of MOs with themselves, as well as with clients’ concurrence. Results showed that the different MOs were emitted in chunks and when MO with clinical information was uttered either with MO with consequences or MO with pairings there was a greater association with Agreement (r = 2.47; r = 1.86) rather than with Disagreement (r = -.53; r = -.36). These findings highlight the importance of the emission of MOs that associate directly events with an eliciting component with clients’ behavior, giving more efficacious strategies to the therapists
Downloads
References
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. Cambridge University Press.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S. C., & Roche, B. (2001). The (not so) strange death of stimulus equivalence. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2(1), 35-41. http://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2001.11434166
Baum W. M. (2011). Behaviorism, private events, and the molar view of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 34(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392249
Clanton-Harpine, E. (2015). Is intrinsic motivation better than extrinsic motivation? In Group-Centered Prevention in Mental Health (pp. 87-107). Springer.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0467
DeLeon, I. G., Anders, B. M., Rodriguez‐Catter, V., & Neidert, P. L. (2000). The effects of noncontingent access to single‐versus multiple‐stimulus sets on self‐injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(4), 623-626. http://doi.org/10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.2.008
Delgado, D., & Rodríguez, A. (2020). Stimulus Equivalence Using a Respondent Matching-to-Sample Procedure with Verification Trials. The Psychological Record, 22, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00438-7
Dougher, M. J., & Hackbert, L. (2000). Establishing operations, cognition, and emotion. The Behavior Analyst, 23(1), 11-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03391996
Eilifsen, C., & Arntzen, E. (2021). Mediated Generalization and Stimulus Equivalence. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 44(1), 1-27. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00281-3
Fagerstrøm, A., & Arntzen, E. (2013). On motivating operations at the point of online purchase setting. The Psychological Record, 63(2), 333-344. http://doi.org/10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.2.008
Fagerstrøm, A., & Ghinea, G. (2011). On the motivating impact of price and online recommendations at the point of online purchase. International Journal of Information Management, 31(2), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.013
Froján-Parga, M. X, Alpañés-Freitag, M., Calero-Elvira, A., & Vargas-De La Cruz, I. (2010). Una concepción conductual de la motivación en el proceso terapéutico [A behavioral conception of motivation in the therapeutic process]. Psicothema, 22(4), 556-561.
Froján-Parga, M. X., Montaño-Fidalgo, M., Calero-Elvira, A. & Ruiz-Sancho, E. (2011). Aproximación al estudio funcional de la interacción verbal entre terapeuta y cliente durante el proceso terapéutico [An approach to the study of functional verbal interaction between therapist and client] . Clínica y Salud, 22(1), 69-85.
Galván-Domínguez, N., Alonso-Vega, J. & Froxán-Parga, M. X. (2020). Verbal aversive control in clinical interaction. Psicothema, 32(2), 182-188.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology: A systematic text in the science of behavior. Appleton-CenturyCrofts.
Langthorne, P., McGill, P., & O'Reilly, M. (2007). Incorporating “motivation” into the functional analysis of challenging behavior: On the interactive and integrative potential of the motivating operation. Behavior modification, 31(4), 466-487.
Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(3), 407-414. http://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-407
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035519
Littell, J. H., & Girvin, H. (2002). Stages of change: A critique. Behavior modification, 26(2), 223-273. http://doi.org/10.1177/0145445502026002006
Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 37(1), 149-155. http://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149
Michael, J. (2007). Motivating operations. In J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, & W. L. Heward (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed., pp. 374–391). Pearson Education.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. Guilford Press.
de Pascual-Verdú, R. & Trujillo-Sánchez (2018). Estudio de la relación entre las verbalizaciones motivadoras y el seguimiento de instrucciones en la terapia psicológica [A study of the relation between motivational utterances and instruction compliance]. Revista Clínica Contemporánea, 9(e14), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5093/cc2018a11
de Pascual-Verdú, R. (2015). La motivación en terapia: Un análisis funcional (tesis doctoral) [Motivation in therapy: a functional análisis (doctoral tesis)]. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.
de Pascual-Verdú, R., Trujillo-Sánchez, C., Gálvez-Delgado, E., Andrés-López, N., Castaño-Hurtado, R. & Froxán-Parga, M.X. (2019). Sistema ACOVEO: Una propuesta funcional para el análisis de la interacción verbal en terapia [ACOVEO System: A functional proposal for the analysis of verbal interaction in therapy]. Conductual, 7(2), 69-82.
Palmer, D. C. (2009). The role of private events in the interpretation of complex behavior. Behavior and Philosophy, 37, 3–19.
Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 19(3), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088437
Ruiz-Sancho, E., Froján-Parga, M. X. & Galván-Domínguez, N. (2015). Verbal interaction patterns in the clinical context: A model of how people change in therapy. Psicothema, 27(2), 99-107.
Schlinger H. D. (1990). A reply to behavior analysts writing about rules and rule-governed behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392849
Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146. http://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127
Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(1), 5-22.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. The Free Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton Century-Crofts.
Staats, C. K., & Staats, A. W. (1957). Meaning established by classical conditioning. Journal of experimental psychology, 54(1), 74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047716
Tonneau, F. (2001). Equivalence relations: A critical analysis. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2(1), 1-33. http://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2001.11434165
Tonneau, F. (2004). Verbal understanding and pavlovian processes. The Behavior Analyst Today, 5, 158-169. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0100029
Tonneau, F., Arreola, F., & Martínez, A. G. (2006). Function transformation without reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85(3), 393-405. http://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2006.49-05
Vargas-de la Cruz, I., Pardo-Cebrián, R., Martínez, H. & Froján-Parga, M. X. (2017). Las verbalizaciones tipo regla del terapeuta a lo largo del proceso clínico [The therapist's rule-type verbalizations throughout the clinical process]. Universitas Psychologica, 16(1), 25-39.
Vaughan, M. E. (1989). Rule-governed behavior in behavior analysis: A theoretical and experimental history. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior. Cognition, contingencies and instructional control (pp. 97-118). Plenum Press.
Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Extrinsic rewards undermine altruistic tendencies in 20-month-olds. Motivation Science, 1, 43–48. http://doi.org/10.1037/2333-8113.1.S.43
Copyright (c) 2023 Servicio de Publicaciones, University of Murcia (Spain)
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.