The impact of three-level differentiated instruction on junior high school students' badminton performance

Authors

  • Joko Sutikno Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
  • Suharjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
  • Ahmad Nasrulloh Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.652651
Keywords: Learning, Differentiated Instruction, Three-Level, Achievement, Badminton

Abstract

Badminton is included as one of the physical education subjects at the primary and secondary school levels in Indonesia. However, based on research, the achievements in badminton at general schools are still low. In class 8 at Junior High School (JHS) Negeri 2 Sleman, with a sample of 31 students who participated in a diagnostic test, only 3 students met the minimum criteria, resulting in a 91% failure rate. This indicates the need for remedial teaching. To improve the achievements, the implementation of a three-level differentiated instruction model was proposed. The research method used was an experimental hypothesis test with a t-test. The research design was as follows: y1 x y2, where y1 is the initial condition, x represents the treatment process, and y2 is the condition after the treatment. The results of the study showed that, after the intervention, the average final test score was 84.62, and 26 students (84%) met the minimum passing criteria. The t-test results indicated a t-value of 6.72 and a critical t-value of 2.04. Since the t-value is greater than the critical t-value, the three-level differentiated instruction model (X) has a positive impact on improving students' performance in badminton (Y). The three-level differentiated learning model can be applied to other subjects with different characteristics, such as mathematics, physics, social sciences, and other disciplines, based on the relevant theoretical framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    102
  • PDF
    32

References

1. Akabruddin, A., Suherman, W. S., Komari, A., Hambali, S., Sapurtra, W., & Permana, M. F. (2024). The Utilization of Differentiated Learning in Improving Physical Fitness and Active Lifestyle of Junior High School Students: Literature Review in Physical Education. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 15(3), 561–577. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1512748

2. Cabello-Manrique, D., Lorente, J. A., Padial-Ruz, R., & Puga-González, E. (2022). Play Badminton Forever: A Systematic Review of Health Benefits. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159077

3. Halil, N. I., Yawan, H., Hasanah, A. N., Syam, H., Andas, N. H., & Marhamah. (2024). A New Program to Foster Inclusion: Unraveling Language Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices to Differentiated Instruction. International Journal of Language Education, 8(2), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i2.64997

4. Hanifa, A. M. (2019). Design Efficiency for Badminton Training Building at West Java Sport Science Training Center. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 248(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/248/1/012033

5. Hidayat, Y., Yudiana, Y., Hambali, B., & Nugraha, R. (2022). Reliability and Factorial Validity of Badminton Basic Skill among Badminton Beginner Athletes: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 10(5), 922–931. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2022.100508

6. Hidayat, Y., Yudiana, Y., Hambali, B., Sultoni, K., Ustun, U. D., & Singnoy, C. (2023). The effect of the combined self-talk and mental imagery program on the badminton motor skills and self-confidence of youth beginner student-athletes. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01073-x

7. Khor, E. T., & K, M. (2024). A Systematic Review of the Role of Learning Analytics in Supporting Personalized Learning. Education Sciences, 14(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010051

8. Krishnaram, N., Ahamed, J., Sathyamoorthy, N., Sandaruwan, K. D., & Athapaththu, A. M. K. B. (2024). Skeletal point analysis to determine the accuracy of forehand smash shots played by badminton players. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 52(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v52i1.12141

9. Liu, W., Zhu, Y., Guo, W., Wang, X., & Yu, S. (2023). Gaming Tree Based Evaluation Model for Badminton Tactic Benefit Analysis and Prediction. Applied Sciences, 13(13), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137380

10. Lynch, T., & Soukup, G. J. (2016). Physical education, “health and physical education”, “physical literacy” and “health literacy”: Global nomenclature confusion. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217820

11. Mardius, A., Sofyan, D., Hadi, R. S., Barlian, E., Ihsan, N., Astuti, Y., & Ockta, Y. (2025). Effectiveness of interval training in increasing VO2max in pencak silat athletes. SPORT TK-EuroAmerican Journal of Sport Sciences, 14, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.643791

12. Nasution, N. S., Pelana, R., Yusmawati, & Fauzi, D. (2024). Machine Learning-Based Badminton Basic Technique Training Model. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 12(6), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2024.120614

13. Negara, J. D. K., Nuryadi, N., Firmansyah, H., Gumilar, A., Hambali, B., Purnomo, E., Festiawan, R., & Ockta, Y. (2024). The effect of vo2max on muscle oxygen saturation (SMO2) in University Badminton Athletes. Retos, 61, 1184–1190. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.108861

14. Pitnawati, Damrah, Handayani, S. G., Putra, A. N., Sasmitha, W., Nelson, S., Wulandari, I., Angelia, L., Ningsih, M. S., & Ockta, Y. (2023). Development of direct and indirect assistance approach using jigsaw method and android-based digital design method for gymnastic materials. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(12), 3292–3298. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.12376

15. Riza, L. S., Firmansyah, M. I., Siregar, H., Budiana, D., & Rosales-Pérez, A. (2018). Determining strategies on playing badminton using the Knuth-Morris-Pratt algorithm. Telkomnika, 16(6), 2763–2770. https://doi.org/10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v16i6.11554

16. Saharullah, Wahyudin, Idrus, N. A., & Ockta, Y. (2024). Application of combination of physical training methods to improve the aerobic capacity of football players. SPORT TK-EuroAmerican Journal of Sport Sciences, 13, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.637341

17. Schwartz, E., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2023). Teacher prototypes in technology-enhanced instruction in elementary school second language acquisition: Comparing routine and emergency learning in different cultures. Computers and Education Open, 5(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100155

18. Spires, H. A., Hervey, L. G., Morris, G., & Stelpflug, C. (2012). Energizing project-based inquiry: Middle-grade students read, write, and create videos. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 55(6), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00058

19. Susaki, Y. (2021). Self-regulated learning and motor skills: effects of a physical education intervention program on Japanese college students. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21(6), 3593–3598. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.06485

20. Umar, Ockta, Y., & Mardesia, P. (2023). A Correlational Study: Pedagogical and professional competence of physical education teachers in relation to the implementation of the Merdeka curriculum. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(12), 3325–3331. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.12380

21. Wintle, J. (2022). Physical Education and Physical Activity Promotion: Lifestyle Sports as Meaningful Experiences. Education Sciences, 12(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030181

Published
31-12-2025
How to Cite
Sutikno, J., Suharjana, & Nasrulloh, A. (2025). The impact of three-level differentiated instruction on junior high school students’ badminton performance. SPORT TK-EuroAmerican Journal of Sport Sciences, 14, 159. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.652651
Issue
Section
Articles