Tactical games and action-research models for skill development in youth football

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.650381
Keywords: Cognitive Learning, Ecological-Dynamic Approach, Game-Based Learning, Skill Development, Technical-Tactical Skills

Abstract

In the football context, the Tactical Games Model (TGM) emerges as an innovative approach that integrates technical and tactical learning through realistic game situations. Despite the fact that the TGM is widely used in physical education to develop students' tactical and decision-making skills, its use in the training of young footballers is still limited. This study employed a quasi-experimental design (non-randomized) to evaluate the effectiveness of a new methodological approach, TGM, compared to action research, in improving learning and the development of key competences related to technical-tactical performance in football. The sample included 40 young footballers between the ages of 11 and 13, divided into an Experimental Group (EG) and a Control Group (CG), with equal distribution based on age and experience. Using an action-research approach, the EG followed the TGM while the CG followed a traditional approach. Two distinct 9-month training protocols were implemented. Performance was evaluated using the Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI), administered before and after the intervention. The EG benefited significantly from the TGM approach, with a significant increase in total scores, from a pre-test average of 15.25 to a post-test average of 22.45. Statistical analysis confirmed the difference between groups (p = .00026). This study shows that TGM represents a promising methodology for the development of technical-tactical skills in young footballers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    37
  • PDF
    16

References

1. Aliberti, S., Calandro, A., Esposito, G., Altavilla, G., & Raiola, G. (2021). Three workouts compared: interval training, intermittent training and steady state training for the improvement of VO2 max and BMI. Sportske Nauke i Zdravlje, 11(2), 197-204.

2. Aliberti, S., D'Elia, F., Giardullo, G., & Raiola, G. (2025). Agonism and performance in adolescent football players in informal physical education settings. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1511719

3. Altavilla, G., Aliberti, S., D’Isanto, T., & Raiola, G. (2022). A comparison between ecological-dynamic and cognitive approach to improve accuracy in basketball shot. Studia Sportiva, 16(1), 6–12.

4. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2003). Becoming critical: education knowledge and action research. Routledge.

5. Csikar, L. (2018). Decision making in the sciences: understanding heuristic use by students in problem solving. Old Dominion University.

6. D’isanto, T., Di Domenico, F., Aliberti, S., D’elia, F., & Raiola, G. (2022) Criticisms and perspectives of heuristic learning in physical education. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, 26(2), 93 –100.

7. Di Domenico, F., D'Isanto, T., Esposito, G., Aliberti, S., & Raiola, G. (2023). Exploring the Influence of Cognitive and Ecological Dynamics Approaches on Countermovement Jumping Enhancement: A Comparative Training Study. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 8(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8030133

8. D'Isanto, T., Altavilla, G., Esposito, G., D'Elia, F., & Raiola, G. (2022). Heuristic Learning and Sport: Theoretical Lines and Operational Proposals. Encyclopaideia, 26(64), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/14237

9. D'isanto, T., Di Domenico, F., D'elia, F., Aliberti, S., & Esposito, G. (2021). The effectiveness of constraints-led training on skill development in football. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 9(6), 1344–1351.

10. Esposito, G., Ceruso, R., Aliberti, S., Raiola, G. (2024). Ecological-Dynamic Approach vs. Traditional Prescriptive Approach in Improving Technical Skills of Young Soccer Players. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 9(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9030162

11. Giardullo, G., Di Lascio, G., Kasa, A., Kaçurri, A., & D’Isanto, T. (2024). The phenomenon of sport dropout: Internal stakeholder perceptions. Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences, 35(109), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9618

12. Gray, S., Sproule, J., & Morgan, K. (2009). Teaching team invasion games and motivational climate. European Physical Education Review, 15(1), 65-89.

13. Harvey, S., & Pill, S. (2016). Comparisons of academic researchers’ and physical education teachers’ perspectives on the utilization of the tactical games model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(4), 313-323.

14. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Deakin University. Victoria.

15. Mitchell, S. A., Oslin, J. L., & Griffin, L. L. (2020). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Human Kinetics.

16. Mitchell, S. A., Oslin, J. L., Griffin, L. L. (2006). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

17. Raiola, G. (2014). Motor control and learning skills according to cognitive and ecological dynamic approach in a vision on behaviorism, cognitive, Gestalt and phenomenology theories. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(15), 504-506.

18. Raiola, G., Esposito, G., Aliberti, S., & D’Elia, F. (2025). Effects on Performance, Perception, and Awareness of Plyometric Training in Youth Volleyball: A Novel Methodological Approach to Training. Applied Sciences, 15(3), 1-12.

19. Stringer, E., & Baldwin, S. (2013). Linking teaching, learning and action research in K-12 classrooms for effective instruction. From Theory to Practice. Context in Praxis.

Published
09-05-2026
How to Cite
Ceruso, R., Di Lascio, G., Cusano, P., Kaçurri, A., Kasa, A., & Giardullo, G. (2026). Tactical games and action-research models for skill development in youth football . SPORT TK-EuroAmerican Journal of Sport Sciences, 15, 34. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.650381
Issue
Section
Articles