El uso responsable de la Inteligencia Artificial en educación superior
Agencias de apoyo
- Cátedra UAM-Founderz-Microsoft de Empleabilidad y Uso Responsable de la IA
- Grupo de investigación Educación Digital e Innovación
Resumen
La rápida expansión de la inteligencia artificial generativa (IAG) en la educación superior ha impulsado nuevas prácticas académicas, pero también ha generado desafíos éticos, institucionales y pedagógicos que exigen una comprensión rigurosa de su uso responsable. Este estudio presenta una revisión sistematizada de 47 artículos publicados entre 2023 y 2025 sobre uso responsable de IAG en contextos universitarios. Los resultados muestran un aumento significativo de publicaciones en este periodo, una distribución geográfica heterogénea y un predominio de estudios descriptivos centrados en percepciones, actitudes y brechas de alfabetización en IA. Asimismo, se identifican tensiones relacionadas con integridad académica, transparencia algorítmica y ausencia de lineamientos institucionales claros. A partir del análisis emergió el sistema categorial ABCE, que integra dimensiones actitudinales, comportamentales, cognitivas y éticas, ofreciendo un marco conceptual útil para comprender la complejidad del uso responsable del IAG. Se discuten implicaciones y líneas de acción para políticas y prácticas universitarias
Descargas
-
Resumen30
-
pdf8
Citas
Abuadas, M. & Albikawi, Z. (2025). AI ethical awareness and academic integrity in higher education: Development and validation of a new scale. Ethics & Behavior, 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2025.2511336
Adewojo, A. A. (2025). Perspectives of academic librarians on ethical challenges of AI-based bibliometric tools: A Ghanaian case study. The Electronic Library. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2025-0166
Airaj, M. (2024). Ethical artificial intelligence for teaching–learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 17145–17167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12545-x
Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2024). Modeling teachers' acceptance of generative AI: The role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust. Education Sciences, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111209
Al-Kumaim, N. H., Hassan, S. H., Al-Shami, S. A. & Alhazmi, A. K. (2025). Exploring generative AI usage patterns in universities: Towards sustainable practices and guidelines for responsible usage. International Journal of Technology in Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1045
Albannai, N. A. (2025). From classroom to boardroom: Ethical and cognitive implications of generative AI use among business students in business problem-solving. The International Journal of Management Education, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101254
Almanea, M. (2024). Instructors’ and learners’ perspectives on using generative AI in higher education and its effect on academic integrity. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2410158
Almassaad, A., Alajlan, H. & Alebaikan, R. (2024). Student perceptions of generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Benefits, limitations, risks, and challenges in higher education. Systems, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385
Alsharefeen, R. & Al Sayari, N. (2025). Examining academic integrity policy and practice in the era of AI: A case study of faculty perspectives. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1621743
Amigud, A. & Pell, D. J. (2025). Responsible and ethical use of AI in education: Square peg in a round hole? World, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020081
Aruleba, K., Sanusi, I. T., Obaido, G., Ogbuokiri, B. & Mienye, I. D. (2025). Learning with ChatGPT in computer science: Responsible use, metacognitive practices, and academic integrity. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09899-7
Asghar, M. Z., Duah, K. A., Iqbal, J. & Järvenoja, H. (2025). Evidence from West Africa on the interplay of affective, behavioural, and cognitive dimensions of AI literacy in Ghanaian and Nigerian universities. Discover Computing, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-025-09691-2
Chen, K., Tallant, A. C. & Selig, I. (2025). Exploring generative AI literacy: Use, evaluation and ethical perceptions. Information and Learning Sciences, 126(1), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-10-2023-0160
Deng, X. F. & Joshi, K. D. (2024). Promoting ethical use of generative AI in education. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 55(3), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3685235.3685237
Deri, E., Frank, D. & Vukovic, D. (2025). Exploring the ethical implications of generative AI in higher education: Justice, fairness and rights. Informatics, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12020036
Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Eldakar, M. A. M., Shehata, A. M. K. & Ammar, A. S. A. (2025). What motivates academics toward generative AI tools? An integrated ethical–social–technological model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 41(3), 747–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251314859
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Act (EU Regulation 2024/…). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/
Gonsalves, C. (2025). Addressing student non-compliance with assessment regulations in higher education: Challenges in the age of AI. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2415654
Hsiao, C. H. & Tang, K. Y. (2025). Beyond acceptance: An empirical study on technological, ethical, social and individual determinants of GenAI-supported learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(8), 10725-10750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13263-0
Kofinas, A., et al. (2025). Academic integrity challenges in higher education in the age of generative AI. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12507-3
Kumar, P., Mastana, A. S., Rungruengarporn, C. & Chantokul, D. (2025). The potential impact of generative AI on the future of higher education: A game-changer or a danger to academic integrity. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(3), 1731–1742. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i3.32148
Liang, J., Stephens, J. M. & Brown, G. T. L. (2025). Asystematic review of the early impact of artificial intelligence on higher education curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Frontiers in Education, 10,1522841. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1522841
Lu, W. K. & Lin, C. H. (2025). How do artificial intelligence literacy and experience shape attitudes and behavioral intentions? A study of university non-expert students. Education and Information Technologies, 30(10), 13779–13805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13323-z
Maxwell, D., Oyarzun, B., Kim, S. & Bong, J. Y. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Perceived readiness, benefits, and challenges. TechTrends, 69(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01109-6
Nwagbara, U. U. (2025). From curiosity to dependency: Nigerian students’ trajectories of generative AI integration in academic research. Ethics and Education, 23(4), 2051–2068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09641-z
OECD. (2019). OECD principles on artificial intelligence. OECD Publishing. https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles
Qian, Y. (2025). Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education: A systematic review of the field. Tech Trends, 69, 1105-1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1
Plecerda, L. P. (2024). Academic integrity surrounding the use of generative AI in higher education: Lenses from ICT college students. Journal of Educational and Social Psychology, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i12.3177
Rughinis, C., Vulpe, S. N., Turcanu, D. & Rughinis, R. (2025). AI at the knowledge gates: Institutional policies and hybrid configurations in universities and publishers. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1608276
Smith, S. M., Tate, M., Freeman, K., Walsh, A., Ballsun-Stanton, B., Hooper, M. & Lane, M. (2025). A university framework for the responsible use of generative AI in research. Tertiary Education and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2025.2509187
Spivakovsky, O., Omelchuk, S., Kobets, V., Poltoratskyi, M., Malchykova, D. & Lemeshchuk, O. (2025). Institutional regulation of AI-based services through the KANO model: The case of Kherson State University. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 108(4). https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v108i4.6269
Subaveerapandiyan, A., Kalbande, D. & Ahmad, N. (2025). Perceptions of transparency and disclosure in generative AI use: A study among PhD scholars in India. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 41(3), 728–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251314840
Subhani, F., Khan, S. A., Sandhu, M. A. & Shahzad, M. F. (2025). What factors explain adoption intention and actual use of ChatGPT? The moderating role of academic integrity. TechTrends, 69(5), 1056–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01096-8
Swidan, A., Lee, S. Y. & Romdhane, S. B. (2025). College students’ use and perceptions of AI tools in the UAE: Training needs and institutional guidelines. Education Sciences, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040461
Tan, M. X. Y., Qu, Y. & Wang, J. (2025). Student perceptions of generative AI regulations in higher education: A mixed-methods study. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70038
Tong, S. T., Detone, A., Frederick, A. & Odebiyi, S. (2025). What are instructors’ generative AI syllabi policies? Variation and challenges. Communication Education, 74(3), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2025.2477479
UNESCO. (2021). Recomendación sobre la Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377897
Wang, C., Wang, H., Li, Y., Dai, J., Gu, X. & Yu, T. (2025). Factors influencing university students’ behavioral intention to use generative AI: An extended theory of planned behavior and AI literacy model. Behaviour and Information Technology, 41(11), 6649–6671. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2383033
Wu, Y. B., Lin, Y. F., Liu, Y. Y. & Yang, Y. R. (2025). A survey on the current status of AI literacy lectures in university libraries under the AIGC background. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103111
Zhang, X. Q., Zhang, J. B. & Oubibi, M. (2025). Effects of Chinese college students’ perceptions of ChatGPT on academic integrity attitudes and intention to disclose AI-generated outputs: A moderated mediation model. Ethics and Education, 23(4), 1709–1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09622-2
Derechos de autor 2026 Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0.
La Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado (RIFOP), con ISSN impreso 0213-8646 e ISSN electrónico 2530-3791, se adhiere a los avisos de derechos de autor propuestos por Creative Commons.
Derechos de autor
Los artículos publicados en la revista están sujetos a las siguientes condiciones:
- La Asociación Universitaria de Formación del Profesorado (AUFOP) es la editora de RIFOP y posee los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados en ella. Se permite la reutilización de estos bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Asociación Universitaria de Formación del Profesorado (AUFOP)
- Los artículos se publican en versión electrónica bajo la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Los artículos pueden copiarse, utilizarse, difundirse, transmitirse y exhibirse públicamente siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de publicación (revista, editores y URL del artículo); ii) no se utilizan con fines comerciales; iii) se menciona la existencia y las especificaciones de la licencia de uso.
- Condiciones de autoarchivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir versiones electrónicas preimpresas (versiones previas a la revisión por pares) y/o postimpresas (versiones revisadas y aceptadas para su publicación) de sus artículos antes de su publicación, ya que esto favorece su rápida circulación y difusión, y supone un posible aumento de citas y alcance dentro de la comunidad académica.
Declaración de privacidad
Los nombres y direcciones de correo electrónico incorporados a esta revista se utilizarán únicamente para los fines declarados de la revista y no estarán disponibles para ningún otro fin ni para terceros.


