The Persistence of Desire

Gay Men Online and Queer Visuality

  • Kaciano Barbosa Gadelha Federal University of Ceará, Culture and Art Institute (ICA)
Palabras clave: Desire, Digital, Visual, Sexuality, Online dating, Queer, Performativity.

Resumen

Queer forms of sociality online have been established as a research field for many social studies that contributed to our contemporary comprehension of new geographies of sexualities. Such a task required a cautious review of existent methodologies and conceptual tools, especially when sexuality comes up as an axis of investigation. In this paper I explore the persistence of the category of “desire” for the study of dissident sexualities online. Although a critical approach to desire is present in queer scholarship, my argument relies on implementing theoretical queer and/or feminist formulations of desire. It has been a problematic standard to combine theories on queer desire without reflecting about the field in which such theories may be applied. Desire as a category has also to do with the dismantling of cruising geographies and with the errant aspect inherent to cruising practices. This paper, by discussing theoretically the relationship between “desire”, “visualization”, and the “digital” points out the disruptive aspect of desire in relation to online ways of seeing and performativity.

Citas

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs Journal of Women in Culture and Society (28)3: 801-831.

Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing. New York: Penguin Books.

Berlant, L. (2012). Desire/Love. New York: Babel Working Group.

Binnie, J. (2004). The globalization of Sexuality. London: Sage.

Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic subjects: embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

Brickell, C. (2012). Sexuality, Power and the Sociology of the Internet. Current Sociology (60) 1, 28-64.

Brown, G. (2008). Ceramic, clothing and other bodies: affective geographies of homoerotic cruising encounters. Social & Cultural Geography (9)8, 915-932.

Browne, K., & Catherine J. N., eds. (2010). Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research. Burlington: Ashgate.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.

Campbell, J. E. (2004). Getting It on Online: Cyberspace, Gay Male Sexuality and Embodied Identity. New York: Harrington Park Press.

Chauncey, G. (1994). Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Making of Gay Male World 1890-1940. New York: Basic Books.

Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Deleuze, G. (1992a). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October 59, 3-7.

Deleuze, G. (1992b). What Is a Dispositif? In: Michel Foucault Philosopher. New York: Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison.New York: Vintage Books.

Fuss, D. (1990). Essentialy Speaking. Feminism, Nature & Difference. New York: Routledge.

Gorman-Murray, A., Nash, C. J. (2016). Digital Sexualities: Section Introduction. In: Brown, G.; Browne, K. (Ed.) The Routledge Companion to Geographies of Sex and Sexuality. New York: Routledge.

Grosz, E. (1991). Jacques Lacan. A Feminist Introduction. New York: Routledge.

Grosz, E. (2001). Architecture from the Outside: Essays on Virtual and Real Space. Massachusetts: MIT.

Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.New York: Routledge.

Jaspal, R. (2016). Gay Men’s Construction and Management of Identity on Grindr. Sexuality and Culture, doi: 10.1007/s12119-016-9389-3

Lacan, J. (1998). The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Lacan, J. (2002). Écrits. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Löw, M. (2001) Raumsoziologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

McGlotten, S. (2013). Virtual Intimacies: Media, Affect and Queer Sociality. New York: SUNY Press.

McLelland, M. J. (2002). Virtual Ethnography: using the Internet to study gay culture in Japan. Sexualities vol. 5(4): 387-406.

Miller, B. (2015). Dude, Where’s Your Face? Self-Presentation, Self-Description, and Partner Preferences on a Social Networking Application for Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Content Analysis. Sexuality and Culture 19, 637-658.

Mooshamer, H. (2005). Cruising: Architektur, Psychoanalyse und Queer Cultures. Vienna: Böhlau.

Mowlabocus, S. (2010). Gaydar Culture: Gay Men, Technology and Embodiment in the Digital Age. Burlington: Ashgate.

Muñoz, J. E. (1999). Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press. O’Riordan, K. & J. Phillips, D. eds. (2007) Queer online: media technology and sexuality. New York: Peter Lang.

Oswin, N. (2008). Critical geographies and the uses of sexuality: deconstructing queer space. Progress in Human Geography32(1): 89-103.

Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Sundén, J. (2003). Material Virtualities: Approaching Online Textual Embodiment.New York: Peter Lang.

Wakeford, N. (2000). Cyberqueer. In David Bell, Barbara M. Kennedy (Ed.), The Cybercultures Reader (pp. 403-415). New York: Routledge.

Publicado
24-02-2017