Barreras anticorrupción, transparencia financiera y calidad de la información contable en los partidos políticos: evidencia en España
Anti-corruption barriers, financial transparency and accounting quality in political parties: Evidence from Spain
Resumen
Este trabajo estudia la transparencia y la calidad de la información contable de los partidos políticos españoles, así como los factores que condicionan la misma, en un contexto temporal marcado por la implementación una serie de barreras institucionales anticorrupción, que endurecen las obligaciones en materia de transparencia financiera. Se utiliza una muestra exhaustiva compuesta por todas las organizaciones políticas fiscalizadas por el Tribunal de Cuentas (TC) en el período analizado. Se implementan modelos lineales de Datos de Panel con efectos fijos y una regresión logística ordenada, ambos con diferentes tipos de información contable, una información original y otra corregida y mejorada utilizando los Informes del TC. Los resultados muestran que, la calidad de la información contable de los partidos es deficiente y, por lo tanto, también el nivel de transparencia financiera. Asimismo, el poder explicativo de los modelos que se estiman con información contable corregida es mayor, siendo la relación ingresos privados y públicos, la antigüedad, el endeudamiento y la tasa de ahorro, variables que afectan de forma significativa a la calidad de la información contable. Se concluye que las barreras institucionales anticorrupción impuestas en materia de transparencia financiera no han sido suficientes, siendo el último ejercicio evaluado, el peor de la serie estudiada, ya que no existe ningún partido que revele información financiera de calidad.
Descargas
Citas
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
Argandoña, A. (2001). Corruption: the corporate perspective. Business Ethics: a European Review, 10(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.t01-1-00227
Auditors Court (2013). Auditing Standards of the Auditing Court, approved by the plenary session on 23 December 2013. (Access 05-03-2018).
Auditors Court (2015). Auditing Report of the Accounting Statements of Political Parties and Contributions Received by Related Foundations and Associations, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.tcu.es/. (Access 01-04-2019).
Auditors Court (2018). Auditing Report of the Accounting Statements of Political Parties and Contributions Received by Related Foundations and Associations, 2014-2015. Retrieved from http://www.tcu.es/. (Access 01-04-2019).
Bai, J. (2009). Panel data models with interactive fixed effects. Econometrica, 77(4), 1229-1279. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6135
Barth, M. E., & Schipper, K. (2008). Financial reporting transparency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23(2), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0802300203
Batta, G., Sucre Heredia, R., & Weidenmier, M. (2014). Political connections and accounting quality under high expropriation risk. European Accounting Review, 23(4), 485-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.906316
Barbadillo, E. R., Aguilar, N. G., & Pena, N. C. (2006). Evidencia empírica sobre el efecto de la duración del contrato en la calidad de la auditoría: análisis de las medidas de retención y rotación obligatoria de auditores. Investigaciones económicas, 30(2), 283-316.
Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12033
Benito López, B., & Martínez Conesa, B. (2002). Análisis de las Administraciones Públicas a Través de Indicadores Financieros: Analysis of Public Administrations Using Financial Indicators. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 5(9), 21-55. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/rcsar/article/view/386391
Benito, B., Bastida, F. & Moreno, M.R. (2006). A proposal for a budget transparency index in the central governments. In Evelyne Lande & Jean-Claude Scheid (Eds.), Accounting Reform in the Public Sector: Mimicry, Fad or Necessity (pp. 101-114), Paris, France: Experts Comptables Média.
Benito, B. (2016). Accountability and Corruption, Europe. In Ali Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1-9). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2291-1
Blackwell, D. W., Noland, T. R., & Winters, D. B. (1998). The value of auditor assurance: Evidence from loan pricing. Journal of Accounting Research, 36(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491320
Blake, J., Bond, R., Amat, O., & Oliveras, E. (2000). The ethics of creative accounting some Spanish evidence. Business ethics: a European review, 9(3), 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00184
Bliese, P. D., Schepker, D. J., Essman, S. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2019). Bridging methodological divides between macro-and microresearch: Endogeneity and methods for panel data. Journal of Management, 46(1), 70-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319868016
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Caruana, J., & Farrugia, B. (2018). The use and non-use of the government financial report by Maltese Members of Parliament. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(4), 1124-1144. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2350
Castro, D. A. (2014). Democracy and political parties financing in Spain. Revista Direito GV, 10(2), 535-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-2432201422
Cavero-Rubio, J.A., & González-Morales, M. (2021). The influence of party funding on the bank indebtedness of political parties. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 24(2), 297-312. https://www.doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.356151
CIS (2019). June 2019 Barometer. Retrieved from [www.cis.es] (Access: 10-10-2019).
Chen, Y., Che, L., Zheng, D., & You, H. (2020). Corruption culture and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(2), 106698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.106698
Chivite Cebolla, M., & Nogales Naharro, M. (2016). Determinants and economic consequences of financial transparency: the specific analysis of the effect arising from the application of the IAS/IFRS in the Spanish companies. Escurialense Legal and Economic Yearbook, (49), 375-402.
Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Vaquero-Cacho, L. A. (2015). The "need to know" and the lack of online transparency among political parties. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-09-2014-0039
De Jager, P. (2008). Panel data techniques and accounting research. Meditari: Research Journal of the School of Accounting Sciences, 16(2), 53-68. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC72555
DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247-1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00088
Della Porta, D., & Vannucci, A. (1997). The resources of corruption: some reflections from the Italian case. Crime, Law and Social Change, 27(3-4), 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008215600420
Duréndez, A. G., & Sánchez Vidal, J. (2008). The relevance of the audit report for obtaining bank credit. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 37(138), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2008.10779645
Everett, J., Neu, D., & Rahaman, A. S. (2007). Accounting and the global fight against corruption. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(6), 513-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.07.002
Foundation Compromiso y Transparencia. (2011). Transparency, the best slogan. Madrid: Retrieved from Https://www.compromisoytransparencia.com (Access 25-02-2019).
Foundation Compromiso y Transparencia. (2012). Transparency, the best slogan. Madrid: Retrieved from https://www.compromisoytransparencia.com (Access 25-02-2019).
Foundation Compromiso y Transparencia. (2013). Transparency, the best slogan. Madrid: Retrieved from https://www.compromisoytransparencia.com (Access 25-02-2019).
Foundation Compromiso y Transparencia. (2014). Transparency, the best slogan. Madrid: Retrieved from https://www.compromisoytransparencia.com (Access 25-02-2019).
Foundation Compromiso y Transparencia. (2015). Transparency, the best slogan. Madrid: Retrieved from https://www.compromisoytransparencia.com (Access 25-02-2019).
Foundation Compromiso y Transparencia. (2016). Transparency, the best slogan. Madrid: Retrieved from https://www.compromisoytransparencia.com (Access 25-02-2019).
Foundation Compromiso y Transparencia. (2017). Transparency, the best slogan. Madrid: Retrievedfrom https://www.compromisoytransparencia.com (Access 25-02-2019).
Garcia‐Rodriguez, I., & Jegers, M. (2017). Capital Structure of Nongovernmental Development Organizations: First Cross‐Country Evidence. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 28(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21275
García-Viñuela, E. (2019). Income-preserving political finance reforms: Evidence from three Spanish reforms. Spanish Review of Sociological Research, 167, 3-18. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5477/cis/reis.167.3
García-Viñuela, E., & García Aguilar, C. (2011). Reforming party finance in Spain. International Journal of Iberian Studies, 24(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijis.24.1.3_1
Garrido, M. D., Domínguez, E. C., & Calvo, D. (2019). La transparencia de los partidos políticos como estrategia electoral. Una evaluación de sus promesas y sus páginas web. Tripodos, 44, 83-104. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2019.44p83-104
González-Díaz, B., García-Fernández, R., & López-Díaz, A. (2013). Audit reports of public state-owned foundations: Determining factors in audit opinions. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 42(160), 535-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2013.11102929
González-Díaz, B., García-Fernández, R., & López-Díaz, A. (2015). Auditor tenure and audit quality in Spanish state-owned foundations. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 18(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2014.04.001
Gowthorpe, C., & Amat, O. (2005). Creative Accounting: Some Ethical Issues of Macro- and Micro-Manipulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-3822-5
Gray, R. (1992). Accounting and environmentalism: an exploration of the challenge of gently accounting for accountability, transparency and sustainability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 399-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90038-T
GRECO. (2013). Evaluation report on Spain on transparency of party funding (Eval III rep). Retrieved from: <https://rm.coe.int/16806c9db2>.
Greene, W. (2002). The Bias of the fixed effects estimator in nonlinear models. Working Paper. New York University.
Grossi, G., & Pianezzi, D. (2018). The new public corruption: Old questions for new challenges. Accounting Forum, 42(1), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.05.002
Hausman, J.A. (1978). Specification test in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271. https://doi.org/0012-9682(197811)46:6%3C1251:STIE%3E2.0.CO;2-X
Herath, S. K., & Albarqi, N. (2017). Financial reporting quality: A literature review. International Journal of Business Management and Commerce, 2(2), 1-14
Hope, O. K., Thomas, W. B., & Vyas, D. (2017). Stakeholder demand for accounting quality and economic usefulness of accounting in US private firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.11.004
Hopkin, J. (2004). The Problem with Party Finance: Theoretical Perspectives on the Funding of Party Politics. Party Politics, 10(6), 627-651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804046911
Hsiao, C. (2007). Panel data analysis: advantages and challenges. Test, 16(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-007-0046-x
Iyoha, F. O., & Oyerinde, D. (2010). Accounting infrastructure and accountability in the management of public expenditure in developing countries: A focus on Nigeria. Critical perspectives on Accounting, 21(5), 361-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2009.06.002
Jegers, M. (2011). On the Capital Structure of Non‐Profit Organizations: A replication and extension with Belgian data. Financial Accountability & Management, 27(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0408.2010.00513.x
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jeppesen, K. K. (2019). The role of auditing in the fight against corruption. The British Accounting Review, 51(5), 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2018.06.001
Johnston, M. (2015). Making transparency real? Accounting and popular participation in corruption control. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 28, 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.009
Keating, E. K., Fischer, M., Gordon, T. P., & Greenlee, J. (2005). The single audit act: How compliant are nonprofit organizations?. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 17(3), 285-309. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-17-03-2005-B002
Kennedy, P. (2008). A Guide to Econometrics, 6th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Law 19/2013, of December 9, (2013), on transparency, access to public information and good governance Official Gazette. Madrid, December 10, 2013, No. 295, p. 99722-99752. (Access 03-12-2018).
Lederman, D., Loayza, N. V., & Soares, R. R. (2005). Accountability and corruption: Political institutions matter. Economics & Politics, 17(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2005.00145.x
Lehman, G., & Thorne, K. (2015). Corruption, criminality and the privatised state: The implications for accounting. Accounting Forum, 39 (4), 366-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2015.10.002
Lindgreen, A. (2004). Corruption and unethical behavior: Report on a set of Danish guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000032388.68389.60
Lobera, J., & García, J. R. (2017). Medición de la cristalización electoral de un movimiento de protesta: de la indignación al voto. Empiria: revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, 38, 151-176. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.38.2018.19715
López, Á. R. (2010). Subvenciones, donaciones y legados a los partidos políticos desde la perspectiva del PGC 2007, Partida Doble. Revista de Contabilidad, Auditoría y Empresa, 221, 30-38.
López, Á. R. (2011). Ventajas e inconvenientes de la financiación pública de los partidos políticos. Actualidad Administrativa, 18, 2.259-2.267.
Mareque, M., Rivo-López, E., Villanueva-Villar, M., & Lago-Peñas, S. (2019). Audit Opinions: Are They Really Different for Family Businesses?. SAGE Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019856725
Martínez-Cousinou, G., & Andersson, S. (2009). Institutional control of the corruption: an analytical framework for its study. CLAD Journal Reform and Democracy, 43, 103-126.
Martínez-Cousinou, G. (2013). El control de la corrupción política en el ámbito de la financiación de los partidos: actores, intereses y estrategias en España y Reino Unido. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia. UNED.
Murphy, J., & Albu, O. B. (2018). The politics of transnational accountability policies and the (re) construction of corruption: The case of Tunisia, Transparency International and the World Bank. Accounting Forum, 42 (1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2017.10.005
Neu, D., Everett, J., Rahaman, A. S., & Martinez, D. (2013). Accounting and networks of corruption. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6-7), 505-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.01.003
Organic Law 3/1987, of 2 July, on the financing of political parties Official Gazette. Madrid, July 3, 1987, p. 20169 to 20170 (Access 05-03-2018).
Organic Law 6/2002, of 27 June, on Political Parties Official Gazette. Madrid, July 28, 2002, No. 154, p. 154 (Access 03-12-2018).
Organic Law 8/2007, of July 4, 2007, on the financing of political parties Official Gazette. Madrid, July 5, 2007, No. 160, p. 29010-29016. (Access 03-12-2018).
Organic Law 5/2012, of October 22, 2012, reforming Organic Law 8/2007, of July 4, on the financing of political parties. (Access 03-12-2018).
Organic Law 3/2015 of March 30, 2015, on the control of the economic and financial activity of political parties. Official Gazette. Madrid, March 31, 2015, No. 77, p. 27186-27215. (Access 03-12-2018).
Ouda, H. A., & Klischewski, R. (2019). Accounting and politicians: a theory of accounting information usefulness. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31 (4), 496-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51595-9_7
Petrovits, C., Shakespeare, C., & Shih, A. (2011). The causes and consequences of internal control problems in nonprofit organizations. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 325-357. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000012
Resolution of the Presidency of the Auditing Court of 8 October 2013, publishing the Resolution of the Plenary of 26 September 2013 approving the Accounting Plan Adapted to Political Formations. Madrid, Official Gazette. Madrid, October 21, 2013, No. 252, p. 85350-85505.
Ríos, A.-M., Bastida, F., & Benito, B. (2018). Risks and Benefits of Legislative Budgetary Oversight. Administration & Society, 50(6), 856-883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715602733
Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Alcaide Muñoz, L., & López Hernández, A. M. (2013). Determinants of financial transparency in government. International Public Management Journal, 16(4), 557-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2013.849169
Rodríguez Gutiérrez, G., & Rodríguez López, A., (2018). Indebtedness and financial dependence in political parties: empirical evidence in Spain (2012-2013). XVIII International Conference ASEPUC 2018. A change of era in Accounting: research, teaching and profession. Madrid.
Rodríguez López, Á. (2010). La financiación de la actividad ordinaria de los partidos políticos en la legislación española. Actualidad Administrativa, 13, 1.563-1.572.
Rodríguez López, Á. (2011). Contabilidad y Financiación de los Partidos Políticos. Madrid: Ed. CISS, Grupo Wolters Kluwer.
Rodríguez López, A. (2012). Análisis de las modalidades de financiación pública directa de los partidos políticos. Actualidad Administrativa, 21, 2.273-2.282.
Rodríguez López, A. (2014). Los recursos financieros privados internos en el ámbito de la política. Actualidad Administrativa, 4, 490-496.
Rodríguez López, A. (2018). Reflexiones acerca de la contabilidad y financiación irregular de partidos políticos. Actualidad Administrativa, 2, 1-7.
Rodríguez López, Á., & Fidalgo Cerviño, E. (2009). La necesidad de un modelo contable normalizado para los partidos políticos en España: ?`de la utopía a la realidad?. AECA: Revista de la Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas, 86, 3-6.
Rodríguez López, Á., & Fidalgo Cerviño, E. (2010). Transparencia y credibilidad: El caso de los partidos políticos en España. Partida Doble, 218,18-24
Rodríguez López, Á., & Fidalgo Cerviño, E. (2011a). Análisis contable de los recursos financieros exigibles de los partidos. El endeudamiento en la política. Partida Doble, 233, 10-19.
Rodríguez López, Á., & Fidalgo Cerviño, E. (2011b). Control financiero, rendición de cuentas y códigos de buen gobierno en el entorno político español. Estudios financieros. Revista de contabilidad y tributación: comentarios, casos prácticos, 337, 137-160.
Rodríguez López, Á., & Fidalgo Cerviño, E. (2012a). Responsabilidad social, crisis financiera y normalización contable en los partidos políticos españoles (Social responsibility, financial crisis and accounting standards in Spanish political parties). CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 74, 239-259.
Rodríguez López, Á., & Fidalgo Cerviño, E. (2012b). Análisis contable de la estructura económica de los partidos políticos conforme a los postulados del PGC'07 y del modelo NIC/NIIF (Accounting Analysis of the Economic Structure of Spanish Political Parties according to the 2007 PGC and the IAS/IFRS Model). Cuadernos de Contabilidad, 13 (33), 337-360.
Rodríguez Teruel, J. (2016). Public money and absent citizens: Party financing in Spain. In Political disaffection and democratic regeneration (pp. 135-172). Spain: Center for Political and Constitutional Studies.
Ruíz Barbadillo, E. R., Aguilar, N. G., & Contreras, A. G. (2002). An inter-sector and size comparison of the quality of the accounting information through the analysis of the audit report. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 31, 545-581.
Ruíz Lozano, M., Tirado Valencia, P., & Morales Gutiérrez, A. C. (2008). Transparency and quality of economic-financial information in non-profit organizations: an empirical study in Andalusia. CIRIEC-España, CIRIEC-Spain, Journal of Economics Public, Social and Cooperative, 63, 253-274.
Sunder, S. (2016). Better financial reporting: Meanings and means. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(3), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.03.002
Sanjurjo Rivo, V. A. (2018). Financing of political parties and transparency: Chronicle of a resistance. Criminal and Criminological Studies, 38, 443-477.
Santano, A. C. (2019). A proposal of legal anti-corruption measures for political parties. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos, 119, 13-37.
Sargiacomo, M., Ianni, L., D'Andreamatteo, A., & Servalli, S. (2015). Accounting and the fight against corruption in Italian government procurement: A longitudinal critical analysis (1992-2014). Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 28, 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.006
Scarrow, S. E. (2007). Political finance in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.080505.100115
Slack, R., & Tsalavoutas, I. (2018). Integrated reporting decision usefulness: Mainstream equity market views. Accounting Forum, 42(2), 184-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2018.01.005
Smulders, J., & Maddens, B. (2016). Political parties annual accounts and the impact of the group of states against corruption in 18 European states: Towards enhanced transparency. Election Law Journal, 15(2), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2016.0369
Tate, S. L. (2007). Auditor change and auditor choice in nonprofit organizations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2007.26.1.47
Van Beest, F., Braam, G., & Boelens, S. (2009). Quality of Financial Reporting: measuring qualitative characteristics. Nijmegen Center for Economics. Working Paper, 09-108. 1-42.
Van Helden, J. (2016). Literature review and challenging research agenda on politicians' use of accounting information. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 531-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1237162
Vico, M. A., & Pucheta, M. C. M. (2005). Relevance of Audit Report for Risk Analysts of Banks: an empirical study. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 34(124), 45-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2005.10779542
Villoria, M., & Jiménez, F. (2012). Corruption in Spain (2004-2010): Data, Perception and Consequences. Spanish Review of Sociological Research, 138(1), 109-134.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Xu, Y., Jiang, L., Fargher, N. y Carson, E. (2011). Audit Reports in Australia during the Global Financial Crisis. Australian Accounting Review, 56(21), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00118.x
Xu, H., Dao, M., & Petkevich, A. (2019). Political corruption and auditor behavior: evidence from US firms. European Accounting Review, 28(3), 513-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1499547
Xu, H., Dao, M., Wu, J., & Sun, H. (2022). Political corruption and annual report readability: evidence from the United States. Accounting and Business Research, 52(2), 166-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1815516
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) y ASEPUC conservan los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. Permite copiar, distribuir e incluir el artículo en un trabajo colectivo (por ejemplo, una antología), siempre y cuando no exista una finalidad comercial, no se altere ni modifique el artículo y se cite apropiadamente el trabajo original. Esta revista no tiene tarifa por la publicación Open Access. ASEPUC y EDITUM financian los costes de producción y publicación de los manuscritos.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente la versión publicada de sus obras, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.