The change of auditor: The Portuguese case
El cambio de auditor: El caso portugués
Abstract
Problems regarding the change of auditor and the opinion issued by the auditor through the financial audit report have been shown to be an important issue.The objective of this study is to examine to what extent the change of auditor is related to the type of opinion that the auditor expressed in the audit report.In pursuit of this objective, an empirical study was carried out supported by a sample from a set of entities with securities admitted to trading on the Portuguese stock market in the period between 2006 and 2012 (seven years) and using logistic regression to test whether the reception of the qualified audit report indicated the change of auditor.The findings point to there being a significant positive relationship between the qualified audit report and a change of auditor, verifiable for qualified opinions on assets and others, but not to the qualified opinions on equity and liabilities.The largest number of qualified opinions occur in the years 2007, 2009 and 2011, most of which were related to equity and assets, and the change of auditor is more associated with qualified opinions on assets and other qualified opinions than the qualified opinions on equity and liabilities.
Downloads
References
[Addams and Davis, 1994] H.L. Addams, B. Davis. Why the fastest growing companies in America hired and fired their auditors. Privately held companies report reasons for selecting and switching auditors. CPA Journal, 64 (1994), pp. 38-41
[Almeida and Silva, 2013] B. Almeida, A. Silva. Integração das teorias explicativas da auditoria no modelo de accountability deLaughlin: análise teórica e empírica. Revista de Contabilidade e Gestão, 14 (2013), pp. 43-92
[Arens and Loebbecke, 1996] A. Arens, J. Loebbecke. Auditing an integrated approach. 6th ed., Prentice Hall Inc., (1996)
[Ball et al., 1979] R. Ball, R. Walker, G. Whittre. Audit qualification and share prices. Abacus, 15 (1979), pp. 23-34
[Ballesta and García-Meca, 2005] J.P.S. Ballesta, E. García-Meca. Audit qualifications and corporate governance in Spanish listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20 (2005), pp. 725-738
[Becker et al., 1998] L. Becker, M. Defond, J. Jiambalvo, K. Subramanyam. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15 (1998), pp. 1-24
[Boynton et al., 2002] W.C. Boynton, R.N. Johnson, W.G. Kell. Modern auditing. 7th ed., Atlas, (2002)
[Brío González, 1998] E.B. Brío González. Efecto de las Salvedades de los Informes de Auditoria sobre el Precio de las Acciones en la Bolsa de Madrid. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidade, XXVII (1998), pp. 129-170
[Burton and Roberts, 1967] J.C. Burton, W. Roberts. A study of auditor changes. Journal of Accountancy, (1967), pp. 31-36
[Cabal Garcia, 2001] E. Cabal Garcia. Informes de auditoria. Partida Doble, 119 (2001), pp. 20-33
[Carpenter and Strawser, 1971] C.G. Carpenter, R.H. Strawser. Displacement of auditors when clients go public. Journal of Accountancy, 131 (1971), pp. 55-58
[Cho and Trent, 2006] J. Cho, A. Trent. Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 6 (2006), pp. 319-340
[Chow and Rice, 1982] C.W. Chow, S.J. Rice. Qualified audit opinions and auditor switching. Accounting Review, (1982), pp. 326-335
[Cosserat and Rodda, 2009] G. Cosserat, N. Rodda. Modern auditing. John Wiley & Sons, (2009)
[Davidson et al., 2004] W.N. Davidson, P. Jiraporn, P.J. DaDalt. Causes and consequences of audit shopping: An analysis of opinions, earnings management and audit changes. Quarterly Journal of Business & Economics, 45 (2004), pp. 69-87 <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918" target="_blank"> http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918 </a>
[Defond and Francis, 2005] M.L. Defond, J.R. Francis. Audit research after Sarbanes-Oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 24 (2005), pp. 5-30
[Firth, 1999] M. Firth. Company takeover and the auditor choice decision. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 8 (1999), pp. 197-214
[Flint, 1988] D. Flint. Philosophy and Principles of auditing – an introduction. The Macmillan Press Ltd, (1988)
[Francis and Krishnan, 1999] R. Francis, J. Krishnan. Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16 (1999), pp. 135-165
[Francis and Wilson, 1988] J.R. Francis, E.R. Wilson. Auditor changes: A joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation. Accounting Review, 63 (1988), pp. 663-682
[García and Martínez, 2001] B. García, P. Martínez. Comprenden los usuarios el informe de auditoria?. Tecnica Contable, 53 (2001), pp. 177-194
[Gay and Schelluch, 2006] G.E. Gay, P. Schelluch. Assurance provided by auditor's reports on prospective financial information: Implications for the expectation gap. Accounting and Finance, 46 (2006), pp. 653-676
[Gómez-Aguillar and Ruiz Barbadillo, 2000] N. Gómez-Aguillar, E. Ruiz Barbadillo. Un estudio empírico sobre la relación entre informe de auditoria y cambio de auditor. Revita Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, XXIX (2000), pp. 705-741
[Gómez-Aguillar and Ruiz Barbadillo, 2003] N. Gómez-Aguillar, E. Ruiz Barbadillo. Do Spanish firms change auditor to avoid a qualified audit report. International Journal of Auditing, 7 (2003), pp. 37-53
[Haskins and Willams, 1990] M.E. Haskins, D. Willams. A contingent model of intra-big eight auditor changes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9 (1990), pp. 55-74
[Heliodoro and Paula, 2014] P. Heliodoro. A mudança de auditor e o relatório de auditoria financeiro. Universidade Aberta, (2014)
[Hope and Langli, 2010] O.K. Hope, J.C. Langli. Auditor independence in a private firm a low litigation risk setting. Accounting Review, 5 (2010), pp. 573-605
[Hudaib and Cooke, 2005] M. Hudaib, T.E. Cooke. The impact of management director changes and financial distress on audit qualification and auditor switching. Journal or Business Finance & Accounting, 32 (2005), pp. 1703-1739 <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9992" target="_blank"> http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9992 </a>
[Ismail et al., 2008] S. Ismail, H.J. Ali Ahmed, A. Md Nassir, M.A. Abdul Hamid. Why Malaysian second board companies switch auditors evidence of Bursa Malaysia. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 13 (2008), pp. 123-130
[Johnson and Lys, 1990] W.B. Johnson, T. Lys. The market for audit services: Evidence from voluntary and auditor changes. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12 (1990), pp. 281-308
[Kotler, 1996] P. Kotler. Principles of marketing. Prentice Hall, (1996)
[Lee, 1996] T. Lee. Corporate audit theory. Chapman & Hall, (1996)
[Lennox, 2000] C. Lennox. Do companies successfully engage in opinion-shopping? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (2000), pp. 321-337
[López Combarros, 1996] J.L. López Combarros. Propuestas para una modificatión de la ley de auditoría de cuentas. Partida Doble, 71 (1996), pp. 42-56
[McFadden, 1973] D. McFadden. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in econometrics, Wiley, (1973)
[McKeown et al., 1991] J. McKeown, J. Mutchler, W. Hopwood. Towards an explanation of auditor failure to modify the audit opinions of bankrupt companies. Journal of Practice and Theory, 10 (1991), pp. 1-13
[Newbold, 1997] P. Newbold. Statistics for business and economics. 4th ed., Prentice Hall International Editions, (1997)pp. 229-236
[OROC, 2001] Ordem dos Revisores Oficias de Contas. Diretriz de Revisão Auditoria 700 – Relatório de Revisão/Auditoria. (2001, Fevereiro)
[Palmrose, 1986] Z.V. Palmrose. An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. Accounting Review, 63 (1986), pp. 55-73
[Pasiouras et al., 2007] F. Pasiouras, C. Gaganis, C. Zopounidis. Multicriteria decision report support methodologies for auditing reports in the UK. European Journal of Operational Research, 180 (2007), pp. 1317-1330
[Patton, 2002] M.Q. Patton. Qualitative research & evaluation methods (. 3rd ed., Sage, (2002)
[Petty and Cuganesan, 1996] R. Petty, S. Cuganesan. Auditor rotation: Framing the debate. Australian Accountant, (1996), pp. 40-41
[Porter et al., 2008] B. Porter, J. Simon, D. Hatherly. Principles of external auditing. 3rd ed., Wiley, (2008)
[Power, 1997] M. Power. Audit society – Rituals of verification. University Press, (1997)
[Ricchiute, 2002] D. Ricchiute. Auditing and assurance services. 7th ed., South-Western College Pub, (2002)
[Ruíz Barbadillo, 1998] Z. Ruíz Barbadillo. Dimensiones informativas y objetivos del informe de auditoria. Revista de Contabilidad, 1 (1998), pp. 120-152
[Saada, 2000] T. Saada. Theorie de l’ information et Comptabilité. Encyclopédie de Comptabilité, Economica, (2000)
[Schelluch and Gay, 2006] P. Schelluch, G. Gay. Assurance provided by auditors’ reports non-prospective financial information implications for the expectation gap. Accounting and Finance, 46 (2006), pp. 653-676
[SEC, 2000] Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Revision of the commission's auditor independence file n° 57-13-00 (RIN.° 3235-AH91). (2000)
[Senteney et al., 2006] D.L. Senteney, Y. Chen, G. Ashok. Predicting impending bankruptcy from auditor qualified opinions and audit firm changes. Journal of Applied Business Research, 22 (2006), pp. 41-55
[Shank and Murdock, 1978] J. Shank, R. Murdock. Comparability in the application of reporting standards: Some further evidence. The Accounting Review, 53 (1978), pp. 824-835
[Siqueira, 2004] E. Siqueira. A importância, a Credibilidade e a influencia do Parecer da Auditoria como ferramenta auxiliary na utilização das Demonstrações Contábeis para a tomada de decisão dos investidores: Um estudo eploratório. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, (2004)
[Smith, 1986] D. Smith. Auditor, subject to opinions, disclaimers and auditor changes. Auditing – A Journal of Practice and Theory, 6 (1986), pp. 95-108
[Warren, 1980] C. Warren. Uniformity of auditing standards: A replication. Journal of Accounting Research, (1980), pp. 312-324
[Wiesner, 1987] W. Wiesner. O parecer de auditoria como instrumento de evidenciação: um evidenciação: um estudo de caso. ISEC – Instituto Superior de Ciências Contábeis – Fundação Getúlio Vargas, (1987)
-
Abstract359
-
PDF142
The publications in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) and ASEPUC conserve the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published manuscripts, and favour and allow their reuse under the licence of use indicated in point 2.
2. The manuscripts are published in the electronic edition of the journal under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. It allows to copy, distribute and include the article in a collective work (for example, an anthology), as long as there is no commercial purpose, the article is not altered or modified and the original work is properly cited. This journal is free of charge for the Open Access publication. ASEPUC and EDITUM finance the productiona and publication costs of the manuscripts.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are permitted and encouraged to electronically disseminate the published version of their works, as it favors their circulation and dissemination and thus a possible increase in their citation and reach among the academic community.