EL TEMPLO DE SANTA MARÍA DE GRACIA DE CASTAGENA: UN PROYECTO INACABADO
Abstract
This temple is a prime example of a situation in which, due to financial problems carrsed by the confrontation of two different and contrasting ideas, a project for the construction of a building was never fully developed, despite being originally favoured by Cardinal Belluga himself albeit with certain reservations. On the one hand there were those who nursed the hope of achieving ends that had nothing to do with the material construction of a temple. i..e. the use of the cathedral floor to this enable them to recover the episcopal seat that had been lost towards the end of XIII century, whereas on the other hand there was the oposition of a chapter who wished to maintain the then present system of economic, financial and ecclesiastical control, justifying the need for a diocesan unity which had been interrupted centuries before with the dismemberment of the Bishopric of Orihuela. The final result of such projects, left in tire charge of an unknown architect who took into account none what soeier of the usual basilican models that were to be found in the Kingdom. was a church of large proportions, but with obvious defects in its execution (consequences of the difficulties involved regarding finance and sponsorship, and of the openly hostile confrontations that took place). All of these factors helped to hinder the carrying out of coherent plans regarding desing, proportions and space, so creating the consequent lack of personality that today can be seen in the old temple of Santa Maria de Gracia.Downloads
1. The authors non-exclusively assign the exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, communication and transformation) to the magazine.
2. The works published in this magazine are subject to the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC By SA 4.0). Therefore, they can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that:
i) the authorship and the original source of its publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work) are cited, thus allowing its recognition.
ii) it is allowed to remix, transform or create from the material while maintaining the same license as the original.
3. Self-archiving conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate the pre-print (version before being evaluated) and/or post-print (version evaluated and accepted for publication) versions of their works before publication, as it favors their publication. Earlier circulation and diffusion and with it a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community. Color RoMEO: verde.
