Aprendizaje colaborativo de Anatomía facilitado con escenarios y videos, una nueva experiencia para los estudiantes del primer año de Enfermería
Resumo
Las Ciencias Básicas pueden ser un reto para los estudiantes en los primeros años de la carrera de Enfermería. En la Universidad Walter Sisulu, África del Sur, la conferencia es el método de enseñanza de la Anatomía en el primer semestre, mientras que en el segundo, los alumnos aprenden esta materia de modo activo y en grupos de colaboración. El propósito de este trabajo fue investigar la evaluación que los estudiantes hicieron de variables que impactan en su nuevo ambiente de aprendizaje, así como incursionar en la relación que pueda existir entre ellas para su interpretación. Todos los estudiantes que finalizaron el primer año en los cursos 2014-16 recibieron un cuestionario con 16 ítems, y el 80.7% (n=168) de las encuestas entregadas fue incluido en este trabajo. Se calculó la estadística descriptiva de las 16 variables y el análisis factorial exploratorio con extracción de factores comunes y rotación oblimin. Los participantes evaluaron satisfactoriamente atributos sobre ellos mismos, sobre el resto de los integrantes de su grupo y acerca del diseño del curso. El análisis factorial exploratorio permitió agrupar las variables en dos dimensiones, una relacionada con las habilidades cognitivas del individuo y la regulación de su aprendizaje, y otra segunda dimensión referida a las relaciones e inter-acciones sociales que se despliegan entre los individuos cuando aprenden en colaboración.Downloads
Referências
Van Wissen K, McBride-Henry K. Building confidence: An exploration of nurses undertaking a postgraduate biological science course. Contemporary Nurse. 2010; 35(1): 26–34.
Whyte DG, Madigan V, Drinkwater EJ. Predictors of academic performance of nursing and paramedic students in first year bioscience. Nurse Education Today. 2011; 31(8): 849–54.
Ali PA, Naylor PB. Association between academic and non-academic variables and academic success of diploma nursing students in Pakistan. Nurse Education Today. 2010; 30(2):157–62.
Lancia L, Petrucci C, Giorgi F, Dante A, Cifone MG. Academic success or failure in nursing students: Results of a retrospective observational study. Nurse Education Today. 2013; 33(12):1501–05
McVicar A, Andrewa S, Kemble R. The ‘bioscience problem’ for nursing students: An integrative review of published evaluations of Year 1 bioscience, and proposed directions for curriculum development. Nurse Education Today. 2015; 35(3):500–09.
Dante A, Ferrão S, Jarosova D, Lancia L, Nascimento C, Notara V, Pokorna A, Ryvarova L, Skela-Saviči B, Palese A. Nursing student profiles and occurrence of early academic failure: Findings from an explorative European study. Nurse Education Today. 2016; 38:74–81.
Mc Garvey A, Hickey A, Conroy R. The anatomy room: A positive learning experience for nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 2015; 35(1):245–50.
Johnston ANB. Anatomy for nurses: Providing students with the best learning experience. Nurse Education in Practice. 2010;10(4):222–26.
Mthembu FS. Learning styles among nursing students, the implications for higher education institutions: A systematic review. South Afr. J. Higher Ed. 2014;28(6):1814-29.
Johnston ANB, Hamill J, Barton MJ, Baldwin S, Percival J, Williams-Pritchard G, Salvage-Jones J, Todorovic M. Student learning styles in anatomy and physiology courses: Meeting the needs of nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice. 2015;15 (6): 415-20.
Arhin AO, Cormier E. Using deconstruction to educate generation Y nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education. 2007; 46(12): 562-67.
Summers M, Volet S. Group work does not necessarily equal collaborative learning: evidence from observations and self-reports. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2010; 25(4): 473-92.
Näykki P , Järvelä S , Kirschner PA , Järvenoja H. Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning—A process-oriented case study in a higher education context.
International Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 68: 1–14.
Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four
recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation [internet]. 2005 [citado 2016 Dic 10]; 10(7).
Disponible en: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7
Van Blankenstein FM, Dolmans DH, van der Vleuten CP, Schmidt HG. Which cognitive processes support learning during small group discussion? Instructional Science. 2011; 39(2):189-204.
Alcolea-Cosín MT, Oter-Quintana C, Martínez-Ortega RM, Sebastián-Viana T, Pedraz-Marcos A. Aprendizaje basado en problemas en la formación de estudiantes de enfermería. Impacto en la práctica clínica. Educ Med [internet]. 2012 [citado 2016 Nov 27]; 15(1): 23-30. Disponible en: http://www.educmed.net
Majeed F. Effectiveness of case-based teaching of physiology for nursing
students. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2014; 9(4): 289-92.
Janssen J, Kirschner F, Erkens G, Kirschner P, Paas F. Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Ed Psychol Review. 2010; 22(2):139-54.
Khosa DK, Volet SE. Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: can it explain differences in students’ conceptual understanding? Metacognition Learning.2014; 9(3): 287-307.
Kalisch BJ, Lee KH. The impact of teamwork on missed nursing care. Nurse Outlook. 2010; 58(5): 233-41.
Cassimjee R. An evaluation of students' perceptions of the use of case based
teaching and group work in a first year nursing programme. South Afr J Higher Ed. 2007; 21(3): 412-28.
Raidal SL, Volet SE. Preclinical students’ predispositions towards social forms
of instruction and self-directed learning: a challenge for the development of autonomous and collaborative learners. Higher Education. 2009: 57(5): 577-96.
Isaac ML. "I hate group work!" Social loafers, indignant peers, and the drama of the classroom. The English Journal. 2012; 101(4): 83-89.
Linda MS, Daniels FM, Fakude LP, Modeste RRM. Students’ experiences of the case-based teaching and learning approach at a school of nursing in the Western Cape, South Africa. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance. 2014; 1(1): 84-95.
Sarikcioglu L, Senol Y, Yildirim FB, Hizay A. Correlation of the summary method with learning styles. Adv Physiol Educ. 2011; 35(2): 290–94.
Volet S, Vauras M, Salonen P. Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist. 2009; 44(4): 215–26.
Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and
internal consistency. J Personality Assessment. 2003; 80(1): 99-103.
As obras que são publicadas nesta revista estão sujeitas aos seguintes termos:
1. O Serviço de Publicações da Universidad de Murcia (a editorial) conserva os direitos patrimoniais (copyright) das obras publicadas, e favorece e permite a reutilização das mesmas sob a licença de utilização indicada no ponto 2.
© Serviço de publicações, Universidad de Murcia, 2011
2. As obras são publicadas na edição eletrónica da revista sob uma licença Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Espanha (texto legal). Podem-se copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir e expor publicamente, sempre que: i) seja citado a autoria e a fonte original da sua publicação (revista, editorial e URL da obra); ii) não se usem para fins comerciais; iii) se mencione a existência e especificações desta licença de utilização.
3. Condições de auto-arquivo. É permitido e aconselha-se aos autores, difundir eletronicamente as versões pré-print (versão antes de ser avaliada) e/ou post-print (versão avaliada e aceite para a sua publicação) das suas obras antes da sua publicação, uma vez que, favorece a sua circulação e difusão mais cedo e com isso um possível aumento na sua citação e alcance entre a comunidade académica. Cor RoMEO: verde.
