POSTMODERNISM AND POSITIVISM IN THE STUDY OF ETHNICITY: ANTHROPOLOGISTS AS THEORISTS VERSUS ANTHROPOLOGISTS AS PROFESSIONAL PRACTICERS
Abstract
Study of ethnicity offers no neutral ground for anthropologists to work. Current theories like neo-marxism, constructivism, postmodernism, positionality theory or subaltern theory argue that ethnic regionalisms are increasing worldwide in step with globalization processes, thereby exploring the ways ethnicity is responsive to all kinds on large-scale institutional forces. However most scholars often ignore the troubling implications of the perspectives they advocate for the structure of their professional organizations and their professional practices. I will make this point with an extended example drawn from my own experience of the anthropological study of ethnicity in Spain.
Downloads
-
Abstract995
-
PDF (Español (España))250
The published works by this Journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publication Service of the University of Murcia (the Editor) owns the copyright of its publications. It promotes and allows its use under the indicated licence in Section 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2011
2. Papers are digitally published under the licence Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (legal text). They can be copied, used, disseminated, transferred and publically presented if: i) the author is quoted, as well as the original source of publication (Journal, editorial and URL); ii) they are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the licence of use is mentioned.
3. Auto-file Conditions. It is allowed and authors are encouraged to digitally disseminate their pre-print versions (versions prior to review) and/or post-print (reviewed version accepted for its publication) since it promotes its early diffusion and the corresponding increase of quotes and scope within the academic community. RoMEO Colour: green.
