¿Es la ambición una cuestión de género? Antecedentes de los estudiantes vs. empleados de la ambición sobre el liderazgo
Resumen
Los obstáculos a lo largo de la carrera de las mujeres demuestran que su ambición de convertirse en líder es compleja porque está influenciada por los estereotipos y roles de género. En este estudio, se les pidió a 625 participantes (54.24% mujeres) de dos categorías (379 estudiantes y 246 empleados) que imaginaran cómo reaccionarían ante un ascenso a una posición de liderazgo y posteriormente, completaron un cuestionario que incluía sus creencias sobre las consecuencias -evaluaciones, ambición, emociones positivas y negativas e ideología de roles de género.
Los estudiantes fueron más ambiciosos que los empleados, independientemente de su género. Sin embargo, al analizar el impacto de la ambición en la decisión de aceptar una posición de liderazgo, observamos que el afecto positivo generado al imaginar una promoción es el aspecto clave para finalmente decidir aceptar la promoción, tanto en estudiantes como en empleados. Sin embargo, en los estudiantes, independientemente de su género, la decisión se predice por afecto negativo, evaluaciones de auto-concepto, pero no por niveles de ambición.
Descargas
Citas
Bear, J. B., Cushenbery, L., London, M., & Sherman, G. D. (2017). Performance feedback, power retention, and the gender gap in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 721–740. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.003
Blackhurst, A. E., & Auger, R. W. (2008). Precursors to the Gender Gap in College Enrollment: Children’s Aspirations and Expectations for Their Futures. Professional School Counseling, 11, 3. doi: 10.1177/2156759X0801100301
Burda, M., Hamermesh, D. S., & Weil, P. (2013). Total work and gender: facts and possible explanations. Journal of Population Economics, 26(1), 239–261. doi:10.1007/s00148-012-0408-x
Bustelo, M. (2016). Three decades of state feminism and gender equality policies in multi-governed Spain. Sex Roles, 74, 107–120. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0381-9
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
Chang, C. D., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Tan, J. A. (2012). Core self-Evaluations: A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 81–128. doi:10.1177/0149206311419661
Chui, C. W. S., & Dietz, J. (2014). Observing workplace incivility towards women: The roles of target reactions , actor motives , and actor-target relationships. Sex Roles, 71, 95–108. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0367-7
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs : Women and men of the past , present , and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188.
Eagly, A. H., Eagly, L. L. C. A. H., Carli, L. L., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. (H. B. Press., Ed.).
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573
Ellemers, N., Heuvel, H. Van Den, Gilder, D. De, Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 315–338.
Elprana, G., Jörg, F., Sybille, S., & Gatzka, M. (2015). Exploring the sex difference in affective motivation to lead furthering the understanding of women’s underrepresentation in leadership positions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14, 142–152.
Estevez-López, F., Pulido-Martos, M., Christopher, J., Wearden, A., Álvarez-Gallardo, I., Arrayás-Grajera, J., … Segura-Jimenez, V. (2016). Factor structure of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in adult women with fibromyalgia from Southern Spain: the al-Ándalus project. PeerJ, 4:e1822. doi:10.7717/peerj.1822
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Lopez-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments : Perceptions of pender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55, 51–61. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9068-1
Gartzia, L., & Lopez-zafra, E. (2014). Gender research in Spanish psychology : An overview for international readers, 445–456. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0380-x
Gartzia, L., & Lopez-zafra, E. (2016). Gender research in Spanish psychology, Part II : Progress and complexities in the European context. Sex Roles, 74, 97–106. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0567-9
Glass, C., & Cook, A. (2016). Leading at the top: Understanding women’s challenges above the glass ceiling. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 51–63. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.003
Hall, G. C. N. (2017). Multicultural psychology. (Routledge, Ed.).
Harman, C., & Sealy, R. (2017). Opt-in or opt-out: exploring how women construe their ambition at early career stages. Career Development International, 22(4), 372–398. doi:10.1108/CDI-08-2016-0137
Haynie, J. J., Harris, S. G., & Brian, C. (2016). The mitigating effects of core self-evaluations in uncertain environments. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(2), 226–240.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
Hernandez, A. S., Escartín, J., & Dick, R. Van. (2014). Gender and leadership in Spain : a systematic review of some key aspects. Sex Roles, 70, 522–537. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0375-7
Hernandez, A. S., Escartin, J., Schuc, S., & van Dick, R. (2016). Who leads more and why? A mediation model from gender to leadership role occupancy. Journal of Business Ethics, 139, 473–483. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2642-0
Hershcovis, S., & Reich, T. (2017). Targeted workplace incivility: The roles of belongingness, embarrassment, and power. Journal of Organizational Behavior, (February). doi:10.1002/job.2183
Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2005). What we know about leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 169–180. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.169
Hoyt, C. L. (2010). Women , men , and leadership: Exploring the gender gap at the top. Social and Personality Psycohology Compass, 4(7), 484–498.
Judge, T. A. (2009). Core self-evaluations and work success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 58–62.
Judge, T. A., Van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Pater, I. E. (2004). Emotional stability, core self-evaluations, and job outcomes : A review of the evidence and an agenda for future research. Human Performance, 17(3), 325–346. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1703
Judge, T., Bono, J., & Thoresen, C. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: develoment of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331.
Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Judge, T. A., & Scott, B. A. (2014). The role of core self-Evaluations in the coping process., Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 127. doi:10.1037/a0013214
Kerr, P., & Holden, R. (1996). Development of the Gender Role Beliefs Scale (GRBS). Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 11(5), 3–16.
Killeen, L. A., Lopez-Zafra, E., & Eagly, A. H. (2006). Envisioning oneself as a leader: comparisons of women and men in spain and the united states. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 312–322.
King, A. R. (2008). Student perspectives on multiracial identity. New Directions for Student Services, (123), 33–41. doi:10.1002/ss
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., & Mitchell, A. A. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642. doi:10.1037/a0023557
Lewis, K. V., Harris, C., Morrison, R., & Ho, M. (2015). The entrepreneurship-motherhood nexus article information: A longitudinal investigation from a boundaryless career perspective. Career Development International, 20(1), 21–37. doi:10.1108/CDI-07-2014-0090
Litzky, B., & Greenhaus, J. (2007). The relationship between gender and aspirations to senior management. Career Development International, 12(7), 637–659. doi:10.1108/13620430710834404
Lopez-Zafra, E., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Do gender stereotypes change? The dynamic of gender stereotypes in Spain. Journal of Gender Studies, 21(2), 169–183. doi:10.1080/09589236.2012.661580
Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2015). What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1678–1712.
Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (2003). Gender, gender identity, and aspirations to top management. Women in Management Review, 18(1/2), 88–96. doi:10.1108/09649420310462361
Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation Modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5–26. doi:10.1177/0013164412449831
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social, 74(3), 629–645.
Sáinz, M., Fàbregues, S., Rodó-de-Zárate, M., Martínez-Cantos, J. L., Arroyo, L., & Romano, M. J. (2018). Gendered motivations to pursue male-dominated STEM careers among Spanish young people: A qualitative study. Journal of Career Development. doi: 10.1177/0894845318801101
Sáinz, M., & Müller, J. (2018). Gender and family influences on Spanish students' aspirations and values in stem fields. International Journal of Science Education. 40(2), 188 - 203. ISSN: 0950-0693. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1405464
Sandín, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., Joiner, T., Santed, M., & Valiente, R. (1999). Escalas PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo: Validación factorial y convergencia transcultural [PANAS scales of sositive and negative affect: Factor analytic validation and cross-cultural convergence]. Psicothema, 11(1), 37–51.
Sealy, R., Doldor, E. & Vinnicombe, S. (2016). Women on boards: Taking stock of where we are (The Female FTSE Board Report). Retrieved from https://www.cranfield.ac.uk/~/media/images-fornew-website/centres/school-of23management-centres/global-centre-for-gender-andleadership/female-ftse-board-report-2016.ashx?la=en
Schuh, S. C., Hernandez, A. S., Frieg, P., & Dick, R. Van. (2014). Gender Differences in leadership role occupancy :The mediating role of power motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(3), 363–379. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1663-9
Shane, J., & Heckhausen, J. (2017). It’ s only a dream if you wake up: Young adults ’ achievement expectations, opportunities, and meritocratic beliefs. International Journal of Psychology, 52(1), 40–48. doi:10.1002/ijop.12408
Sheykhshabani, S. H. (2011). Validity and reliability of core self-evaluations scale in Iranian employees. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1561–1565. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.331
Spanish Organic Law 3/2007 for the effective equality between women and men. retrieved from https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2007/BOE-A-2007-6115-consolidado.pdf
Streets, V. N., & Major, D. A. (2014). Gender and careers obstacles and opportunities. In S. Kumra, R. Simpson and R. J. Burke (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gender in Organizations. 293-313. Oxford University Press
Stumpp, T., Muck, P. M., Judge, T. A., & Maier, G. W. (2010). Core self-evaluations in Germany: Validation of a German measure and its relationships with career success. Applied Psychology, 59(4), 674–700. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00422.x
Test, C. I. (2000). International guidelines for test use. Retrieved from www.intest.org/itc_projects.htm
Van Vianen, A. E. M. (1999). Managerial self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, and work-role salience as determinants of ambition for a managerial position 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(3), 639–665. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01406.x
Walsh, K., Fleming, S. S., & Enz, C. A. (2016). Give and you shall receive: investing in the careers of women professionals g. Career Development International, 21(2), 193-211. doi:10.1108/CDI-04-2015-0059
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Watts, L. L., Frame, M. C., Moffett, R. G., Hein, J. L. Van, & Hein, M. (2015). The relationship between gender, perceived career barriers, and occupational aspirations. Journal of Applied Social Psycholog, 45, 10–22. doi:10.1111/jasp.12271
Derechos de autor 2021 Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia (España)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
