Independent and Interdependent? Agentic and Communal? Self-construals of People Fused with a Group
Supporting Agencies
- Presented research and preparation of this article were supported by a SONATA BIS 4 grant from the National Science Centre in Poland (#2014/14/E/HS6/00587) to Tomasz Besta.
Abstract
Four studies were conducted to examine how self and group identity fusion is related to self-construals, self-perception of agentic and communal traits, and the desire for self- and group verification. In study 1 (N1 = 244), identity fusion in relation to country and gender was examined, while in studies 2 (N2 = 164), and 3 (N3 = 166) participants’ relations with social groups important to and chosen by them were analyzed. Study 4 (N4 = 796) included football fans, and they described their relations with other fans. The results showed that high identity fusion was described by (a) high results for interdependent and independent self-construal, except when fusion with country was considered (studies 1, 2, and 4); (b) simultaneously high agency and communion (studies 3 and 4); and (c) a strong desire for self-verification at the group and personal levels of self-description.
Downloads
References
Atran, S., Sheikh, H., & Gómez, Á. (2014). Devoted actors sacrifice for close comrades and sacred cause. PNSA, 111(50), 17702–17703. doi:10.1073/pnas.1420474111
Becker, J. C., & Tausch, N. (2015). A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 43–92. doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1094265
Besta, T. (2014). Overlap between personal and group identity and its relation with radical pro-group attitudes: data from a Central European cultural context. Studia Psychologica, 56, 67-80.
Besta, T., Gómez, Á., & Vázquez, A. (2014). Readiness to deny group’s wrongdoing and willingness to fight for its members: The role of the Poles’ identity fusion with the country and religious group. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 2(1), 49‒55. doi:10.5114/cipp.2014.43101
Besta, T., Mattingly, B., & Błażek, M. (2016). When membership gives strength to act: Inclusion of the group into the self and feeling of personal agency. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156(1), 56-73. doi:10.1080/00224545.2015.1053838
Besta, T., Szulc, M., & Jaśkiewicz, M. (2015). Political extremism, group membership, and personality traits: Who accepts violence? Revista de Psicología Social: International Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 563–585. doi:10.1080/02134748.2015.1065085
Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 142–179. doi:10.1177/1088868310373752
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149.
D’Amico, A., & Scrima, F. (2016). The Italian validation of Singelis’s Self-Construal Scale (SCS): A short 10-item version shows improved psychometric properties. Current Psychology, 35, 159–168. doi:10.1007/s12144-015-9378-y
Gómez, A., Brooks, M. L., Buhrmester, M. D., Vázquez, A., Jetten, J., & Swann, Jr., W. B. (2011a). On the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 918–933. doi:10.1037/a0022642
Gómez, Á., Morales, J. F., Hart, S., Vázquez, A., & Swann, Jr., W. B. (2011b). Rejected and excluded forevermore, but even more devoted: Irrevocable ostracism intensifies loyalty to the group among identity fused persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1574–1586. doi:10.1177/0146167211424580
Gómez, Á., & Vázquez, A. (2015). El poder de “sentirse uno” con un grupo: Fusión de la identidad y conductas progrupales extremas [The power of “feeling one” with a group: Identity fusion and extreme progroup behaviors]. Revista de Psicología Social, 30(3), 1–31. doi:10.1080/02134748.2015.1065089
Gore, J. S., & Cross, S. E. (2011). Conflicts of interest: Relational self-construal and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Self and Identity, 10(2), 185–202. doi:10.1080/15298861003684390
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Jaśkiewicz, M., & Besta, T. (2014). Is easy access related to better life? Walkability and overlapping of personal and communal identity as predictors of quality of life. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(3), 505–516. doi:10.1007/s11482-013-9246-6
Jong, J., Whitehouse, H., Kavanagh, C., & Lane, J. (2015). Shared negative experiences lead to identity fusion via personal reflection. PloS one, 10(12), e0145611. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145611
Khan, S. S., Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., Tewari, S., Srinivasan, N., & Stevenson, C. (2015). How collective participation impacts social identity: A longitudinal study from India. Political Psychology, 37(3), 309–325. doi:10.1111/pops.12260
Kwiatkowska, A., Anikeenok, O. A., Alishev, B. S., Kulikov, L., Malyonova, A., & Taburova, T. S. (2015). Religijność a zadowolenie z życia Rosjan [Religiosity and quality of life of Russians]. In H. Grzymała-Moszczyńska & D. Motak (Eds.), Religia, religijność, duchowość. W poszukiwaniu nowych perspektyw [Religion, religiosity, spirituality. In search of new perspectives] (pp. 105–121). Kraków, Poland: Wydawnitwo UJ.
Kwiatkowska, A., Roszak, J., Sikora, R., Kuo, B. C. H., Karpinskij, K., Gushchina, T., & Gober, G. (2014). Kultura a strategie radzenia sobie ze stresem. Badania międzykulturowe [Culture, stress and coping strategies. A cross-cultural study]. Psychologia Społeczna, 9, 68–91. doi:10.7366/189618002014280105
Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Shepherd, S. (2011). Self-stereotyping as a route to system justification. Social Cognition, 29(2), 360–375. doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.360
Nussinson, R., Häfner, M., Seibt, B., Strack, F., & Trope, Y. (2012). Approach/avoidance orientations affect self-construal and identification with in-group. Self and Identity, 11(2), 255–272. doi:10.1080/15298868.2011.559044
Pilarska, A. (2014). Self-construal as a mediator between identity structure and subjective well-being. Current Psychology, 33(2), 130–154. doi:10.1007/s12144-013-9202-5
Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2013). Towards a “science of movement”: Identity, authority and influence in the production of social stability and social change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 112–131. doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.266
Seih, Y. T., Buhrmester, M. D., Lin, Y. C., Huan, C. L., & Swann, Jr., W. B. (2013). Do people want to be flattered or understood? The cross-cultural universality of self-verification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 169–172. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.09.004
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591.
Swann, Jr., W. B., & Buhrmester, M. D. (2015). Identity fusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 52–57. doi:10.1177/0963721414551363
Swann, W. B., Buhrmester, M. D., Gómez, M., Jettem, J., Bastian, B., Vázquez, A., . . . Zhang, A. (2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 912–926. doi:10.1037/a0036089
Swann, Jr., W. B., Gómez, A., Huici, C., Morales, J. F., & Hixon, J. G. (2010). Identity fusion and self-sacrifice: Arousal as a catalyst of pro-group fighting, dying, and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 824–841. doi:10.1037/a0020014
Swann, Jr., W. B., Gómez, A., Seyle, D. C., Morales, J. F., & Huici, C. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 995–1011. doi:10.1037/a0013668
Swann, Jr., W. B., Jetten, J., Gómez, Á., Whitehouse, H., & Bastian, B. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119(3), 441–456. doi:10.1037/a0028589
Swann, Jr., W. B., Polzer, J. T., Seyle, D. C., & Ko, S. J. (2004). Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. The Academy of Management Review, 29(1), 9–27.
Swann, Jr., W. B., Stein-Seroussi, A., & Giesler, R. B. (1992). Why people self-verify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 392–401. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.392
Utz, S. (2004). Self-construal and cooperation: Is the interdependent self more cooperative than the independent self? Self and Identity, 3, 177–190. doi:10.1080/13576500444000001
Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535.
Wiesenfeld, B. M., Swann, W. B., Brockner, J., & Bartel, C. A. (2007). Is more fairness always preferred? Self-esteem moderates reactions to procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1235–1253.
Wojciszke, B., Abele, A. E., & Baryla, W. (2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(6), 973–990. doi:10.1002/ejsp.595
Wojciszke, B., & Szlendak, M. A. (2010). Skale do pomiaru orientacji sprawczej i wspólnotowej [Scales measuring agency and communion]. Psychologia Społeczna, 5(1), 57–70.
Wright, S. C., Aron, A., & Tropp, L. R. (2002). Including others (and groups) in the self: Self-expansion and intergroup relations. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal and intergroup perspectives (pp. 343–368). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Zumeta, L., Basabe, N., Wlodarczyk, A., Bobowik, M., & Páez, D. (2016). Shared flow and positive collective gatherings. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 32(3), 717–727. doi:10.6018/analesps.32.3.261651
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.