The corporate social responsibility policies for the inclusion of people with disabilities as predictors of employees’ identification, commitment and absenteeism
Abstract
Few studies have explored the effect on employees of corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies focused on the inclusion of people with disabilities. The present research examines the extent to which employees’ perceptions of CSR policies aimed at the employment of disabled people are related to organizational identification, commitment, and absenteeism. A questionnaire was administered to 104 employees (participation rate: 41.1%). Correlations and common method variance tests, and linear regressions were performed. Only the internal-focus policies have an effect on employees’ identification and commitment, although the external-focus policies have been more deeply studied. There were no significant results related to absenteeism. Our research highlights the impact of internal-focus policies for the inclusion of people with disabilities in the commitment and identification of all employees, those with and without disabilities. The results also contribute significantly to the design of strategies that facilitate and enhance the normalization of these employees in the labor market, helping practitioners to target these companies as future employers of people with disabilities.Downloads
References
Aharon, T., Lior, O., Yaki, B., & Gal, K. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, organizational justice and job satisfaction: How do they interrelate, if at all? Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 27(1), 67-72. doi: 10.5093/tr2011v27n1a7
Al-bdour, A., Nasruddin, E., & Lin, S. (2010). The relationship between internal corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment within the banking sector in Jordan. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 5(14), 932-951. Retrieved from http://www.waset.org/publications/1224
Alcover de la Hera, C. M., & Pérez Torres, V. (2011). Trabajadores con discapacidad: problemas, retos y principios de actuación en salud ocupacional. Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo, 57, 206-223. doi: 10.4321/S0465-546X2011000500013
Ali, I., Rehman, K., Ali, S., Yousaf, J., & Zia, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility influences, employee commitment and organizational performance. African Journal of Business Management, 4(12), 2796-2801. Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM
Birth, G., Illia, L., Lurati, F., & Zamparini, A. (2008). Communicating CSR: practices among Switzerland's top 300 companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(2), 182-196. doi: 10.1108/13563280810869604
Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The conctribution of corporate social responsability to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1701-1719. doi: 10.1080/09585190701570866
Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111-132. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z
Campbell, J. P. (1977). On the nature of organizational effectiveness. A P. S. Goodman, & J. M. Pennings, New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 13-55). London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13, 1-13. doi: 10.1002/csr.132
David, F. R. (2010). Strategic Management: Concepts (13th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ernst&Young & Biocat. (2011). Catalonia Life Sciences Report 2011. Retrieved from http://www.biocat.cat/sites/default/files/Catalonia_Life_Sciences__Report_final.pdf
European Comission. (2001). Green Paper - Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_DOC-01-9_en.pdf
European Comission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52011DC0681
Galbreath, J. (2010). How does corporate social responsibility benefit firms? Evidence from Australia. European Business Review, 22(4), 411-431. doi: 10.1108/09555341011056186
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, INE. (2013). Encuesta de población activa. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es/prensa/epa_tabla.htm
International Labour Office, ILO. (2010). Disability in the Workplace: Company Practices. Geneva: ILO. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/dialogue/actemp/downloads/publications/working_paper_n3.pdf
International Organization for Standardization, ISO. (2010). ISO 26000:2010. Guidance on Social Responsibility. Genève: ISO.
Kim, H., Lee, M., Lee, H., & Kim, N. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee-company identification. Journal of business Ethics, 95, 557-569. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0440-2
Munduate, L., Di Marco, D., Martínez-Corts, I., Arenas, A., Gamero, y., & N. (2013). Rebuilding the social dialogue and promoting inclusive organizations. A tool for social innovation in times of crisis.
Papeles del Psicólogo, 35(2), 122-129. Retrieved from http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/english/2363.pdf
National Disability Coordination Officer Program. (nd). Value for business. Queensland: NDCOP.
Pinillos, A. A. Una herramienta de competitividad para el futuro [CSR 2.0. A tool of competitiveness for the future]. Telos, 79, 100-111. Retrieved from http://www.albertoandreu.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/TELOS_Andreu_RSC_20_espa%C3%B1ol.pdf
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Quijano, S., Navarro, J., & Cornejo, J. M. (2000). Un modelo integrado de compromiso e identificación con la organización: análisis del cuestionario ASH-ICI. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 10(2), 27-61.
*Authors & others (2008). Deleted for peer review. doi: Deleted for peer review
Real Decreto Legislativo 1/2013, de 29 de noviembre por el que se aprueba el Texto Refundido de la Ley General de derechos de las personas con discapacidad y de su inclusión social (29 de Noviembre de 2013). Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2013/12/03/pdfs/BOE-A-2013-12632.pdf
Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2008). Do employees care About CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 265-283. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9618-7
*Authors & others (2011). Deleted for peer review. doi: Deleted for peer review
*Authors & others (2011b). Deleted for peer review. doi: Deleted for peer review
Skudiene, V., & Auruskeviciene, V. (2012). The contribution of corporate social responsability to internal employee motivation. Baltic Journal of Management, 7(1), 49-67. doi: 10.1108/17465261211197421
Turker, D. (2009). How corporate and social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 189-204. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9993-8
Villafañe, J. (2009). Reputación corporativa y RSC. Bases empíricas para un análisis [Corporate reputation and CSR. Empirical bases for analysis]. Telos, 79, 75–81. Retrieved from http://telos.fundaciontelefonica.com/telos/articulocuaderno.asp@idarticulo=3&rev=79.htm
Vitaliano, D. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and labor turnover. Corporate Governance, 10, 563-573. doi: 10.1108/14720701011085544
Wiggett-Barnard, C., & Swartz, L. (2012). What facilitates the entry of persons with disabilities into South African companies?. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(12), 1016-1023. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.631679
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.
