Motivational Orientations of High-Achieving Students as Mediators of a Positive Perception of a High-Achieving Classmate: Results from a Cross-national Study
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore whether and in what ways high-achieving school students’ motivational orientations influence their perceptions of a fictitious future high-achieving classmate. The final sample consisted of the 396 highest achieving students out of a sample from 1794 seventh and tenth graders from five countries: Australia, Peru, South Korea, Spain, and Vietnam. A series of stepwise regression models were used to test the hypothesis that positive perceptions of a high-achieving classmate might be mediated by an approach motivation, but not by an avoidance motivational orientation. The hypothesis was generally confirmed. Learning goal orientation and performance approach motivation predicted positive perceptions of a high-achieving classmate’s intellectual ability, social qualities and popularity among peers, whereas a performance avoidance orientation was usually uncorrelated. However, sporadic exceptions have been found among the participants from Vietnam, South Korea, and Peru.
Downloads
References
Bagès, C. & Martinot, D. (2011). What is the best model for girls and boys faced with a standardized mathematics evaluation situation: A hardworking role model or a gifted role model? British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 536–543.
Baker; J.A., Bridger, R., & Evans, K. (1998/2011). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(1), 5-15. doi: 10.1177/001698629804200102
Behling, O., & Law, K.S. (2000) Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., & Messner, C. (2003). The Devaluation Effect: Activating a need devalues unrelated objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 463–473. doi:10.1086/346243
Brophy, J. (2005). Goal Theorists Should Move on From Performance Goals. Educational Psychologist, 40(3), 167–176. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4003_3
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: the effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 557–572. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557
Fiedler, E.D., Lange, R. E., Winebrenner, S. (1993). In search of reality: Unraveling the myths about tracking, ability grouping, and the gifted. Roeper Review, 16, 4-7.
Händel, M., Duan, X., Sutherland, M. & Ziegler, A. (2014). Successful in science and still popular: A pattern that is possible in China rather than in Germany or Russia. International Journal of Science Education. 36, 887–907. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.830232
Händel, M., Vialle, W., & Ziegler, A. (2013). Student perceptions of high achieving classmates. High Ability Studies, 24, 99-114.
Harackiewicz, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1993). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 904–915. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.904
Heise, D. R. (2010). Surveying cultures: Discovering shared conceptions and sentiments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lee, S.-Y. (2002). The effects of peers on the academic and creative talent development of a gifted adolescent male. Journal of Advanced Academics, 2002, 14(1), 19-29. doi: 10.4219/jsge-2002-387
Lockwood, P. & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 91-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.91
Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2000). The influence of goals on value and choice. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 39, 97–128.
Neumeister, K. L. S., & Finch, H. (2006). Perfectionism in High-Ability Students: Relational Precursors and Influences on Achievement Motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), 238–251. doi:10.1177/001698620605000304
Person, R. S. (2010). Experiences of intellectually gifted Students in an egalitarian and inclusive educational system: A survey study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(4), 536-569.
Peterson, J. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(3), 280-282. doi:10.1177/0016986209346946
Piechowski, M.M. (1997). Emotional giftedness: The measure of intrapersonal intelligence. In N. Colangelo and G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd edition, pp. 366 – 381). Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.
Read, D., & van Leeuwen, B. (1998). Predicting Hunger: The Effects of Appetite and Delay on Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 189–205. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2803
Rossi, P. H., & Nock, S. L. (Eds.) (1982). Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Salili, , F., Chiu, C., & Lai, S. (2001). The influence of culture and context on students’ motivational orientation and performance. In F Salili, C.Y. Chiu, & Y.Y. Hong (Eds.), Student motivation: The culture and context of learning (pp. 221-248). New York: Plenum.
Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1116–1127. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1116
Shin, J. E. L., Levy, S. R., & London, B. (2016). Effects of role model exposure on STEM and non-STEM student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Article first published online: 7 Jan 2016. DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12371
Smith, T.W. (2004). Developing and evaluating cross-national survey instruments. In: Presser S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M., et al. (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 431—452). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley.
Smith, J. L. (2004). Understanding the Process of Stereotype Threat: A Review of Mediational Variables and New Performance Goal Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 177–206. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034020.20317.89
Stopper, M. (Ed.) (2000). Meeting the social and emotional needs of gifted and talented children. London: NACE/ David Fulton Publishers.
Tao, V., & Hong, Y.Y. (2000). A meaning system approach to Chinese students’ achievement goals. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 1(2), 13-38.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder: Westview Press.
Ziegler, A., Dresel, M., & Stoeger, H. (2008). Addressees of performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 643–654. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.643
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.
