Does motivational interviewing improve the effectiveness of a psychological treatment to quit smoking?

Authors

  • Bárbara Piñeiro Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Facultad de Psicología, Departamento de Psicología Clínica y Psicobiología, Unidad de Tabaquismo, Campus Universitario Sur, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña.
  • Elena Fernández del Río Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Facultad de Psicología, Departamento de Psicología Clínica y Psicobiología, Unidad de Tabaquismo, Campus Universitario Sur, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña.
  • Ana López-Durán Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Facultad de Psicología, Departamento de Psicología Clínica y Psicobiología, Unidad de Tabaquismo, Campus Universitario Sur, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña.
  • Elisardo Becoña Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Facultad de Psicología, Departamento de Psicología Clínica y Psicobiología, Unidad de Tabaquismo, Campus Universitario Sur, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.1.131961
Keywords: Smoking, intervention, motivational interviewing, psychological treatment, smoking cessation.

Abstract

Several studies show that when using motivational interviewing (MI) added to standard treatment, in order to increase motivation, treatment outcomes improve. The aim of this study was to examine whether smokers who receive an intervention with MI before a cognitive-behavioral psychological treatment to quit smoking they improve adherence and treatment effectiveness, and they reduce the risk of relapse at follow-up compared with smokers who only receive cognitive-behavioral psychological treatment for smoking cessation. We compared the effectiveness of adding or not MI to a psychological treatment to quit smoking in a sample of 58 smokers (46.6% men and 53.4% women). The experimental group received 2 sessions of MI before the beginning of the 6 sessions of the psychological treatment, while the control group received only 6 sessions of treatment. The results showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups in adherence to treatment, and treatment outcomes at the end of treatment and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. We conclude that intervention with MI does not produce better results compared to the application of cognitive-behavioral psychological treatment alone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Bárbara Piñeiro, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Facultad de Psicología, Departamento de Psicología Clínica y Psicobiología, Unidad de Tabaquismo, Campus Universitario Sur, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña.

Unidad de Tabaquismo, Departamento de Psicología Clínica y Psicobiología.
Published
09-12-2013
How to Cite
Piñeiro, B., Fernández del Río, E., López-Durán, A., & Becoña, E. (2013). Does motivational interviewing improve the effectiveness of a psychological treatment to quit smoking?. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 30(1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.1.131961
Issue
Vol. 30 No. 1 (2014)
Section
Clinical and Health Psychology

 

The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.

© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022

2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.