Reflections on the Baron and Kenny model of statistical mediation

Authors

  • Antonio Pardo Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Marta Román Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.2.139241
Keywords: Baron and Kenny, statistical mediation, indirect effects

Abstract

In the 25 years since Baron and Kenny (1986) published their ideas on how to analyze and interpret statistical mediation, few works have been more cited, and perhaps, so decisively influenced the way applied re­searchers understand and analyze mediation in social and health sciences. However, the widespread use of a procedure does not neces­sarily make it a safe or reliable strategy. In fact, during these years, many researchers have pointed out the limitations of the procedure Baron and Kenny proposed for de­monstrating mediation. The twofold aim of this paper is to (1) carry out a review of the limitations of the method by Baron and Kenny, with parti­cular attention to the weakness in the confirmatory logic of the procedure, and (2) provide an empirical example that, in applying the method, data obtained from the same theoretical scenario (i.e., with or without the pre­sence of mediation) can be compatible with both the mediation and no-mediation hypotheses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
28-04-2013
How to Cite
Pardo, A., & Román, M. (2013). Reflections on the Baron and Kenny model of statistical mediation. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 29(2), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.2.139241
Issue
Section
Methodology