Adaptation to the Spanish university context and psychometric properties of the MSLQ: Contributions to the measurement and analysis of gender differences of self-regulated learning

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.444851
Keywords: Self-regulated learning, Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), metric invariance, adaptation, psychometric properties, higher education

Abstract

A challenge in advancing research into self-regulated learning in general, and gender differences in particular, is related to the measurement of various components and self-regulatory processes of it. Therefore, this study aims to adapt into Spanish and analyzes 1) the internal structure, reliability, and gender invariance of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) and 2) the differences between males and females in the MSLQ dimensions and subdimensions. Participants consisted of 428 university students (73.7% women). Results showed that this adaptation is shorter than the original and has better metric properties than other versions. Also, invariance analysis showed that for men and women, the instrument possesses a common structure and loads (metric invariance) that guarantees valid score comparisons by gender. Moderate to high differences were found in women’s favor in the value given to homework, different learning strategies, and anxiety before examinations. This study responds to the need for a culturally adapted, valid, and reliable instrument in Spain and delves into gender differences in self-regulated learning, a key building block to successfully develop academic training at the present times.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Olga Cardeñoso Ramírez, Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (España)

 

 

 

 

References

Albert, A. (2017). Evaluación del aprendizaje autorregulado: Validación del motivated strategies for learning questionnaire en educación secundaria (Tesis Doctoral). Universitat de Vàlencia, Valencia.

Bozpolat, E. (2016). Investigation of the self-regulated learning strategies of students from the faculty of education using ordinal logistic regression analysis. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 16(1), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.1.0281

Bruso, J., & Stefaniak, J. E. (2016). The Use of Self-Regulated Learning Measure Questionnaires as a Predictor of Academic Success. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 60(6), 577-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0096-6

Cano, F. (2000). Diferencias de género en estrategias y estilos de aprendizaje. Psicothema, 12(3), 360-367.

Cardozo, A. (2008). Motivación, aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en estudiantes del primer año universitario. Laurus, 14(28), 209-237.

Credé, M., & Phillips, A. L. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002

Curione, K., & Huertas, J. A. (2016). Revisión del MSLQ: veinticinco años de evaluación motivacional. Revista de Psicología, 12(24), 55-67.

Donolo, D., Chiecher, A., Paolini, P., & Rinaudo, M. C. (2008). MSLQe-MSLQvv. Motivated strategies learning questionnaire. Propuestas para la medición de la motivación y el uso de estrategias de aprendizaje. Río Cuarto, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto.

Hambleton, R. K., & Zenisky, A. L. (2011). Translating and adapting tests for cross-cultural assessments. En D. Matsumoto y F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Culture and psychology. Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 46-74). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition). [www.InTestCom.org]

Inzunza, B., Pérez, C., Márquez, C., Ortiz, L., Marcellini, S., & Duk S. (2018). Estructura Factorial y Confiabilidad del Cuestionario de Motivación y Estrategias de Aprendizaje, MSLQ, en Estudiantes Universitarios Chilenos de Primer Año. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, 2, 21-35. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP47.2.02

Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236

Larruzea-Urkixo, N.; Cardeñoso, O., & Idoiaga, N. (2020). El alumnado del grado de educación ante las tareas universitarias: emoción y cognición. Educación XX1, 23(1), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.23453

Larruzea-Urkixo, N., Cardeñoso, O., & Idoiaga N. (2021). Interpretación cognitiva y emocional sobre el EEES del alumnado del Grado de Educación Primaria de la facultad de educación de la UPV/EHU. Profesorado, Revista De Currículum Y Formación Del Profesorado, 25(2), 307-326. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v25i2.9119

Li, K. (2019). MOOC learners’ demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 132, 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003

Martínez, J .R. & Galán, F. (2000), Estrategias de aprendizaje, motivación y rendimiento académico en alumnos universitarios. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía, 11(19), 35-50.

Moravec, J. W. (2008). A new paradigm of knowledge production in higher education. On the Horizon 16(3), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120810901422.

Muñoz, C. (2012). Relaciones existentes entre estrategias metacognitivas, motivación y rendimiento académico en los diferentes niveles educativos de estudiantes universitarios chilenos (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad del País Vasco, Leioa.

Musso, M. F., Boekaerts, M., Segers, M., & Cascallar, E. C. (2019). Individual differences in basic cognitive processes and self-regulated learning: Their interaction effects on math performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 71, 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.03.00

Navea, A. (2015). Un estudio sobre la motivación y estrategias de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios de ciencias de la salud (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad de Educación a Distancia, Madrid.

Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich y Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.

Pintrich, P. R., & García, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. En M. L. Maehr y P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement (pp. 371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Pintrich, P., Smith, D., García, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.

Ramírez, M. C., Canto, J. E., Bueno, J. A., & Echazarreta, A. (2013). Validación Psicométrica del Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire en Universitarios Mexicanos. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(1), 193-214.

Ramírez-Echeverry, J. J., García-Carrillo, A., & Olarte, F. A. (2016). Adaptation and Validation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire—MSLQ—in Engineering Students in Colombia. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), 1–14.

Rinaudo, M. C., Barrera, M. L., & Donolo, D. S. (2006). Motivación para el aprendizaje en alumnos universitarios. Revista Electrónica De Motivación y Emoción, 9(22), 1-19.

Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Nguyen, Q., & Littlejohn, A. (2019). Unpacking the intertemporal impact of self-regulation in a blended mathematics environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.007

Rodarte-Luna, B., & Sherry, A. (2008). Sex differences in the relation between statistics anxiety and cognitive/learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.03.002

Roces, C., Tourón, J., & González-Torres, M.C. (1995). Validación preliminar del CEAM II (Cuestionario de Estrategias de Aprendizaje y Motivación II). Psicológica, 16(3), 347-366.

Rusillo, M. T., & Casanova, P. F. (2004). Diferencias de género en la motivación académica de los alumnos de educación secundaria obligatoria. Revista Electrónica De Investigación Psicoeducativa, 2(3), 97-112.

Rovers, S., Clarebout, G., Savelberg, H., de Bruin, A., & Merriënboer, J. (2019). Granularity matters: comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 14, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09188-6.

Suárez, J., Nieto, D. A., & Veiga, I. G. (2004). Diferencias diagnósticas en función del género respecto a la utilización de estrategias autorreguladoras en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 22(1), 245-258.

Syam, S., Abdullah, N., & Badrasawi, K. (2016). Motivational Orientations and Learning Strategies among Undergraduate Students in Study Circle Course. Asian Social Science, 12. 179-187, https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n6p179.

Torrano, F., Fuentes, J. L., & Soria, M. (2017). Aprendizaje autorregulado: estado de la cuestión y retos psicopedagógicos. Perfiles educativos, 39(156), 160-173.

Torrano, F., & Soria, M. (2017). Diferencias de género y aprendizaje autorregulado: el efecto del rendimiento académico previo. Revista Complutense de Educación, 28(4), 1027-1042. https://doi.org/10.5209/RCED.51096

Tseng, W. T., Liu, H., & Nix, J. M. (2017). Self-regulation in language learning: Scale validation and gender effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 124(2), 531-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512516684293

Valenzuela, S., & Suárez, M. (2017). Las estrategias de aprendizaje y las metas académicas en función del género, los estilos parentales y el rendimiento en estudiantes de secundaria. Revista Complutense de Educación, 30(1), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.5209/RCED.56057

Velasco Angulo, C., & Cardeñoso Ramírez, O. (2020). Evaluación de la competencia de aprendizaje autorregulado en función del nivel educativo y el género de alumnado de carreras administrativas. Perfiles Educativos, 42(169). https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2020.169.58687

Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martínez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-eficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-Regulated Learning and Performance. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge.

Published
19-04-2022
How to Cite
Cardeñoso Ramírez, O., Larruzea-Urkixo, N., & Bully Garay, P. (2022). Adaptation to the Spanish university context and psychometric properties of the MSLQ: Contributions to the measurement and analysis of gender differences of self-regulated learning. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 38(2), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.444851
Issue
Section
Developmental and Educational Psychology

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
1
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
52%
33%
Days to publication 
511
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Editum - Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (España)