Sexting behaviours in adolescents: Personality predictors and psychosocial outcomes in a one-year follow-up
Abstract
The relationships between personality and sexting have been scarcely studied. In addition, the scarcity of longitudinal studies about predictors and consequences of sexting is notorious. This study analyzed the longitudinal data from 624 adolescents who were evaluated on two occasions (T1 and T2) separated by a period of one year, and to whom questionnaires were administered to measure sexting, the personality traits of the five factor model (FFM), as well as possible psychosocial consequences of sexting. The results indicate that high extraversion and low agreeableness and conscientiousness (T1) are related to sexting (T2). In addition, the study also allows us to identify which specific facets of personality (T1) are associated with sexting registered in T2. On the other hand, regression analyses indicate that extraversion predicts increases in sexting between T1 and T2. As for the outcomes of sexting, a high involvement in sexting T1 predicts decreases in victimization and in the positive emotions experienced between T1 and T2. Therefore, this study shows that personality allows for prediction of changes in sexting throughout adolescence; sexting, in turn, seems to be associated with relevant psychosocial consequences in this developmental period.
Downloads
References
Adachi P. & Willoughby T. (2015). Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: implications for psychological science. European Journal Developmental Psychology, 12, 116–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.963549
Alonso, C. & Romero, E. (2017). Aggressors and victims in bullying and cyberbullying: A study of personality profiles using the five-factor model. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20. e76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2017.73
Barlett, C. P. & Anderson, C. A. (2012). Direct and indirect relations between the big five personality traits and aggressive and violent behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(8), 870-875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.029
Baumgartner, S. E., Weeda, W. D., Van der Heijden, L. L. & Huizinga, M. (2014). The relationship between media multitasking and executive function in early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(4), 1120–1144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0272431614523133
Buelga, S., Cava, M. J. & Musitu, G. (2012). Validación de la escala de victimización entre adolescentes a través del teléfono móvil y de internet. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 32(1), 36–42.
Butt, S. & Philips, G. (2008). Personality and self-reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 346-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.019
Charnigo, R., Noar, S. M., Garnett, C., Crosby, R, Palmgreen, P. & Zimmerman, R. S. (2013). Sensation seeking and impulsivity: combined associations with risky sexual behavior in a large sample of young adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 480-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.652264
Cooper, K., Quayle, E., Jonsson, L. & Svedin, C. G. (2016). Adolescents and self-taken sexual images: A review of the literature. Computers in Human Behaviour, 55, 706-716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.003
De Wit, H. (2009). Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addiction Biology, 14(1), 22-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x
Delevi, R. & Weisskirch, R. (2013). Personality factor as predictors of sexting. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29(6), 2589-2594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.003
Del Rey, R., Casas, J. A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Smith, P. & Plichta, P. (2015). Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 141-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.065
Drouin, M. & Landgraff, C. (2012). Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 444-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.015
Fajardo, M. I., Gordillo, M. & Regalado A. B. (2013). Sexting: nuevos usos de la tecnología y la sexualidad en adolescentes. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1(1), 521-534.
Gámez-Guadix, M. & De Santisteban, P. (2018). “Sex Pics?”: Longitudinal predictors of sexting among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 63, 608-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.05.032
Gámez-Guadix, M., de Santisteban, P. & Resett, S. (2017). Sexting among Spanish adolescents: Prevalence and personality Profiles. Psicothema, 29, 29-34.
Galovan, A. M., Drouin, M. & McDaniel, B. T. (2018). Sexting profiles in the United States and Canada: Implications for individual and relationship well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 19-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.017
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “Description of Personality”: The Big-Five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
Houck, C., Swenson, R., Donenberg, G., Papino, A., Emerson, E. & Brown, K. (2014). Adolescents’ emotions prior to sexual activity and associations with sexual risk factors. AIDS and Behavior, 18, 1615–1623.
Hoyle, R. H., Fejfar, M. C., & Miller, J. D. (2000). Personality and sexual risk taking: A quantitative review. Journal of Personality, 68(6), 1203-1231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00132
Hudson, H. K. (2011). Factors affecting sexting behaviours among selected undergraduate students (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Southern University Illinois Carbondale, Illinois, United States.
Hudson, H. K. & Fetro, J. V. (2015). Sextual activity: Predictors of sexting behaviors and intentions to sext among selected undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 615-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.048
Jasso-Medrano, J. L., López-Rosales, F. & Gámez-Guadix, M. (2018). Assessing the links of sexting, cybervictimization, depression, and suicidal ideation among university students. Archives of Suicide Research, 22(1), 153-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2017.1304304
Kerstens, J. & Stol, W. (2014). Receiving online sexual requests and producing online sexual images: The multifaceted and dialogic nature of adolescents’ online sexual interactions. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(1), artículo 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-1-8
Kopecký, K. (2011). Sexting among Czech preadolescents and adolescents. New Educational Review, 28, 39–48.
Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting. Washington, DC: Millennials: A Portrait of Generation Next, PEW Internet & American Life Project, PEW Research Center.
Lippman, J. R. & Campbell, S.W. (2012). Teenagers and sexting: perceived norms and sexual double standard. ICAConference, Phoenix, AZ.
Madigan, S., Ly, A., Rash, C. L., Van Ouytsel, J., & Temple J. R. (2018). Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth - A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(4), 327-335.
McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. En J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), Five factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York: Guilford Press.
McCrae. R. R., Costa, P. T., & Busch, C. M. (1986). Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems: The California Q-Set and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 54, 430-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00403.x
Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., Jones, L. M. & Wolak, J. (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: A national study. Pediatrics, 129, 13-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1730
Morelli, M., Bianchi, D., Baiocco, R., Pezzuti, L. & Chirumbolo, A. (2016). Not-allowed sharing of sexts and dating violence from the perpetrator’s perspective: The moderation role of sexism. Computers in Human Behaviors, 56, 163-169.
Newsom, J. T. (2015). Longitudinal structural equation modeling: A comprehensive introduction. Routledge: New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa250
Ortega-Ruiz, R., Del Rey, R., & Casas, J. A. (2016). Evaluar el bullying y el cyberbullying validación española del EBIP-Q y del ECIP-Q. Psicología Educativa, 22, 71-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.01.004
Ortet, G., Escrivá, P., Ibañez, M. I., Villa, H., Mezquita, L. & Ruipérez, M. A. (2010). Versión corta de la adaptación española del NEO-PI-R (JS NEO-S). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10, 327-344.
Ortet, G., Ibañez, M. I., Moya, J., Villa, H., Viruela, A., & Mezquita, L. (2012). Assessing the Five Factor of Personality in adolescents: The junior version of the spanish NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 19, 114-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191111410166
Reyns, B. W., Burek, M. W., Henson, B. & Fisher, B. S. (2013). The unintended consequences of digital technology: Exploring the relationship between sexting and cybervictimization. Journal of Crime and Justice, 36, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2011.641816
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R. & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323.
Romero, E., Luengo, M. A., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A. & Sobral, J. (2002). La estructura de los rasgos de personalidad en adolescentes: El Modelo de Cinco Factores y los Cinco Alternativos. Psicothema, 14(1), 134-143.
Selig J. P. & Little T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In Laursen, B., Little, T. D. y Card, N. A (Eds). Handbook of Developmental Research Methods (pp. 265-278). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Temple, J. R. & Choi, H. (2014). Longitudinal association between teen sexting and sexual behavior. Pediatrics, 134(5), 1287-1292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1974
Temple, J. R., Le, V. D., van den Berg, P., Ling, Y., Paul, J. A., & Temple, B. W. (2014). Brief report: Teen sexting and psychosocial health. Journal of Adolescence, 37(1), 33-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.10.008
Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., Campbell, S. W., Eggermont, S. & Roe, K. (2014). Sexting, mobile porn use and peer group dynamics: Boys’ and girls’ self-perceived popularity, need for popularity, and perceived peer pressure. Media Psychology, 17(1), 6–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.801725
Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Ponnet, K. & Walrave, M. (2014). Brief report: The association between adolescents’ characteristics and engagement in sexting. Journal of Adolescence, 37(8), 1387-1391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.10.004
Vedel, A. (2014). The Big Five and tertiary academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 66–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.011
Walker, S., Sanci, L. & Temple-Smith, M. (2011). Sexting and young people: Expert’s views. Youth Studies Australia, 30(4), 8-16.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Weisskirch, R. S., & Delevi, R. (2011). ‘‘Sexting’’ and adult romantic attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1697-1701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.008
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.
