Adaptation of the Beliefs about Well-Being Scale to the Spanish population

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.336241
Keywords: Happiness, eudaimonia, hedonism, well-being

Supporting Agencies

  • No se ha recibido financiación externa

Abstract

The study of happiness and well-being is receiving increased attention in different fields. Recent research into well-being has focused on delving deeper into the individual’s conception about the experience of well-being. McMahan and Estes (2011a) created a scale that assesses lay conceptions of well-being (BWBS) based on four dimensions: the experience of pleasure, avoidance of negative experience, self-development and contribution to others. The goal of this study was to adapt this scale, the Beliefs about Well-Being Scale, to the Spanish population. The sample consisted of 1,024 participants from the general population ranging in age interval from 17 to 87 years old. The confirmatory factorial analysis results in a structure of four dimensions, similar to the original scale, although in the adaptation of the scale the items decrease from 16 to 12. The results of the reliability analysis reveal indexes similar to those of the original scale. These results confirm the validity of Beliefs about Well-Being Scale with general population in a cultural context different from the original study. This will allow cross-cultural studies to analyze the influence of culture in the perception of well-being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jesús San Martín García, Facultad de Psicología. Campus de Teatinos, s/n 29071 (Málaga)

Departamento de Psicología Social. Profesor Titular de Universidad

Fabiola Perles, Universidad de Málaga

Departamento de Psicología Social, Profesora Titular de Universidad

Jesús Canto-Ortiz, Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Málaga (Spain)

Departamento de Psicología Social. Catedrático de Universidad. Universidad de Málaga

References

Allport, G. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). Amos (v. 20.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: SPSS.

Becker, L. (1992). Good lives: Prolegomena. Social Philosophy and Policy, 9, 15-37.

Brülde, B. (2007). Happiness and the good life. Introduction and conceptual framework. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 1-14.

Bryce, J. & Haworth, J. (2002). Wellbeing and flow in sample of male and female office workers. Leisure Studies, 21, 249-263.

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York: Routledge.

Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22, 7-16.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. The Psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow. New York: Basic Books.

Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R. & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2004). Are Scandinavians happier than Asians? Issues in comparing nations on subjective well-being. In F.Columbus, Asian economic and political issues (Vol. 10, pp. 1-25). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2006). The desirability of happiness across cultures. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.

Diener, E., Sapyta, J. J., & Suth, E. M. (1998). Subjective well-being is essential to well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 33-37.

Fierro, A., & Rando, B. (2007). Escala Eudemon de bienestar personal: características psicométricas [Personal Well-being Scale Eudemon: Psychometric characteristics]. Anuario de Psicología, 38, 401-412.

Gaskin, J. (2014). Stats Tools Package. Retrieved from: http://www.kolobkreations.com/Stats%20Tools%20Package.xlsm

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Guignon, C. (1999). The good life. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage.

Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). The how of happiness. New York: The Penguin Press.

Lyubomirsky, S. & Lepper, H. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155.

Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111-131.

McMahan, E. A., Dixon, K. J., & King, L. M. (2012). Evidence of associations between lay conceptions of well-being, conception-congruent behavior, and experienced well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9347-1

McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2011a). Measuring lay conceptions of well-being: The beliefs about well-being scale. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 267-287. doi: 10-1007/s10902-010-9194-x

McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2011b). Hedonic versus Eudaimonic Conceptions of Well-Being: Evidence of Differential Associations with Self-Reported Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 103 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9698-0

McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2012). Age-Related Differences in Lay Conceptions of Well-Being and Experienced Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 79-101.

McMahan, E. A., Renken, M. D., Kehn, A., & Nitkova, M. (2013). Individual conceptions of well-being predict psychological and subjective well-being: Beyond the Big Five. In F. Sarracino (Ed.), The Happiness Compass: Theories, Actions, and Perspectives for Well-Being (pp. 3-16). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: the full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25-41.

Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beerman, U., Park, N., & Seligman, M. (2007). Strengths of character, orientations to happiness and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 149-156. doi: 10.1080/17439760701228938

Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Ryan, R. M., & Decy, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.

Authors own (2010). Satisfacción vital y percepción de felicidad en jóvenes universitarios [Life Satisfaction and Perception of Happiness among University Students]. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 617-628.

Seligman, M. (2002). Authentic happiness. New York: Free Press.

Sheldon, M. & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). Achieving sustainable gains in happiness: change your actions, not your circumstances. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 55-86.

Tkach, C. & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How do people pursue happiness?: Relating personality, happiness-increasing strategies, and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 183-225.

Veenhoven, R. (2003). Hedonism and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 437-457.

Published
25-04-2021
How to Cite
San Martín García, J., Perles, F., García Martín, M. A., & Canto-Ortiz, J. (2021). Adaptation of the Beliefs about Well-Being Scale to the Spanish population. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 37(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.336241
Issue
Section
Clinical and Health Psychology

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
3
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
52%
33%
Days to publication 
1027
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Editum - Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (España)