The dimensional validation of the Student Engagement Questionnaire (SEQ) with a Spanish university population. Students’ capabilities and the teaching-learning environment

  • Bernardo Gargallo University of Valencia
  • Jesús M. Suárez-Rodríguez University of Valencia
  • Gonzalo Almerich University of Valencia
  • Irene Verde University of Valencia
  • Maria Àngels Cebrià i Iranzo University of Valencia
Keywords: Assessment of teaching-learning processes, Questionnaire, Students’ capabilities, Teaching and learning environment, University students


In this work, the SEQ (Student Engagement Questionnaire - Kember & Leung, 2009) was validated with a Spanish sample. This instrument is designed to make a joint assessment of teaching-learning processes at university and to provide feedback to teachers and institutions to improve these processes. A sample of 805 subjects from three Valencian universities was used. The questionnaire assesses the capabilities of several students, and the teacher’s ability to design an adequate learning environment. Several versions have been developed until its dimensions (latent variables), and the relations between the involved variables, achieve high degree of stability. A confirmatory factor analysis corroborated the structure proposed by the authors and the relations between the involved variables. Hence the instrument seems suitable to be used in Spanish samples for the proposal it was designed for.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Bernardo Gargallo, University of Valencia
Catedrático de Teoría de la Educación. Departamento de Teoría de la Educación. Universidad de Valencia. Premio Nacional de Investigación Educativa del Ministerio de Educación en 2000 y 2004
Jesús M. Suárez-Rodríguez, University of Valencia
Catedrático. Departamento de Métodos de Investigación y Diagnóstico en Educación. Universidad de Valencia
Gonzalo Almerich, University of Valencia

Profesor Contratado Doctor.  Departamento de Métodos de Investigación y Diagnóstico en Educación. Universidad de Valencia


Irene Verde, University of Valencia
Profesora Contratada Doctora.  Departamento de Teoría de la Educación. Universidad de Valencia
Maria Àngels Cebrià i Iranzo, University of Valencia
Profesora Contratada Doctora.  Departamento de Fisioterapia. Universidad de Valencia


Alonso, C., Gallego, D. y Honey, P. (1995). Los estilos de aprendizaje. Procedimientos de diagnóstico y mejora. Bilbao: Ediciones Mensajero.

Biggs, J. (1987a). Students Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Biggs, J. (1987b). Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ). Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Biggs, J. (1988). Approaches to Learning ant to Essay Writing. In R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles (pp. 185-228). Nueva York: Plenum Press.

Biggs, J., Kember, D. y Leung, D.Y.P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433

Byrne, B.M. (2006). Structural equation modelling with EQS. Basic Concepts, Aplications and Programing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Segunda edición.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. London: Routledge.

Corno, L. (1994). Implicit teachings and self-regulated learning. Comunicación presentada en el Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA, April, 4-8.

Crocker, J.C. y Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16 (3), 297-334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555

Entwistle, N., Hanley, M. y Hounsell, D.J. (1979). Identifying distinctive approaches to studying, Higher Education, 8, 365-380. doi: 10.1007/BF01680525

Entwistle, N., McCune, V. y Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: Mesasuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle y J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful Learning Environments: Unravelling Basic Components and Dimensions (pp. 89-107). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

Entwistle, N. y Peterson, E. (2004). Learning styles and approaches to studying. En Ch. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Psycology, Vol 2 (pp. 537-542). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Entwistle, N. y Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. Londres: Croom Helm.

Gargallo, B. (2008): Estilos de docencia y evaluación de los profesores universitarios y su influencia sobre los modos de aprender de sus estudiantes. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 241, 425-445.

Gargallo, B., Garfella, P.R., Pérez, C. y Fernández, A. (2010). Modelos de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Ponencia presentada en el XXIX Seminario Interuniversitario de Teoría de la Educación "Formación y participación de los estudiantes en la universidad". Madrid, Universidad Complutense, Noviembre.

Gargallo, B., Suárez, J., Garfella, P. R. y Fernández, A. (2011): El cuestionario CEMEDEPU. Un instrumento para la evaluación de la metodología docente y evaluativa de los profesores universitarios. Estudios sobre educación, 21, 9-40.

Gargallo, B., Suárez-Rodríguez, J. y Pérez-Pérez, C., C. (2009). El cuestionario CEVEAPEU. Un instrumento para la evaluación de las estrategias de aprendizaje de los estudiantes universitarios. RELIEVE, 15 (2). 1-31.

Gow, L. y Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 20-33. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01039.x

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (Seventh edition). Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River.

Honey, P. y Mumford, A. (1982) Manual of Learning Styles London: P Honey.

Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D., Du Toit, S. y Du Toit, M. (1999). LISREL 8: New statistical features. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

Jornet, J. M. y Suárez, J. M. (1996). Pruebas estandarizadas y evaluación del rendimiento: usos y características métricas. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 14 (2), 141-163.

Kember, D. y Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 58-74. doi: 10.2307/2943877

Kember, D. y Kwan, K-P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 460-490. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0593-7_10

Kember, D. y Leung, D. (2005a). The influence of active learning experiences on the development of graduate capabilities, Studies in Higher Education, 30 (2), 155-170. doi: 10.1080/03075070500043127

Kember, D. y Leung, D. (2005b). The influence of the teaching and learning environment on the development of generic capabilities needed for a knowledge-based society. Learning Environments Research, 8, 245-266. doi: 10.1007/s10984-005-1566-5

Kember, D. y Leung, D. (2009). Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance. Learning Environments Research, 12, 15-29.

Kember, D. y Leung, D. (2011). Disciplinary differences in student ratings of teaching quality. Research in Higher Education, 52, 278-299. doi: 10.1007/s11162-010-9194-z

Kember, D., Leung, D. y Ma, R. (2007). Characterizing learning environments capable of nurturing generic capabilities in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 2, 48(5), 609-632. doi: 10.1007/s11162-006-9037-0

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

Kolb, D. (1976). The Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual. Boston: McBer and Company.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experimental Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Marton, F. (1983). Beyond individual differences, Educational Psychology, 3, 289-304. doi: 10.1080/0144341830030311

Marton, F. y Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning: I. Outcome and process, Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x

Marton, F. y Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning: II. Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task, Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115-127.

Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography-Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200. doi: 10.1007/BF00132516

Monereo, C. (1997). La construcción del conocimiento estratégico en el aula, en Mª.L. Pérez Cabaní, La enseñanza y el aprendizaje de estrategias desde el currículum (pp. 21-34). Gerona: Horsori.

Monereo, C. y Badía, A (2013) Aprendizaje estratégico y tecnologías de la información y la comunicación: una revisión crítica. Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información, 14:2, pp. 15-41.

Pascarella, E.T. y Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How college affects sutdents: findings and insights form twenty years of research. San Francisco: CA, Jossey-Bass.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. En M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 451-502). California: Academic Press.

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16 (4), 385-407. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F. García, T. y Mackeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the

use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: Universidad de Michigan. Technical Report No. 91-B-004.

Popham, J. (1990). Modern educational measurement. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire, Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129-150. doi: 10.1080/03075079112331382944

Raykov, T. (2001). Testing multivariable covariance structure and means hypotheses via structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 224-257. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_4Raykov, T. (2004). Point and interval estimation of reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments via linear constraint covariance structure modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 342-356. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_3

Satorra, A., y Bentler, EM. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard enors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye y C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J., y McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A Reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning: Improving Students as Learners (pp. 262-271). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

Trigwell, K. y Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers’ approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32 (1), 77-87. doi:10.1007/BF00139219

Trigwell, K. y Prosser, M. (2004). Development and Use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16 (4), 409-424. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9

Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. y Waterhouse, F. (1997). Relations between Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching and Students’ Approaches to Learning. Higher Education, 37 (1), 57-70. doi: 10.1023/A:1003548313194

Trillo, F. y Méndez, R.Mª. (1999). Modelos de enseñanza de los profesores y enfoques de aprendizaje de los estudiantes: un estudio sobre su relación en la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Adaxe, 14-15, 131-147.

Vermunt, J.D. (1994). Inventory of Learning Styles (ILS). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University, Department of Educational Psychology.

Weinstein, C. E. (1987). LASSI User’s Manual. Clearwater, FL: HyH and Publishing Company.

Weinstein, C.E., Acee, T.W. y Jung, J. (2011). Self-Regulation and Learning Strategies. New directions for teaching and learning, 126, 45-53. doi: 10.1002/tl.443

Weinstein, C.E., Husman, J. y Dierking, D. (2002). Self-Regulation Interventions with a focus on learning strategies. En M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich y M. Zeinder; Handbook of Self-regulation (pp. 727-747). San Diego: Academic Press.

Yip, M.C.W. (2012). Learning strategies and self-efficacy as predictors of academic performance: a preliminary study. Quality in Higher Education, 18 (1), 23- . doi: 10.1080/13538322.2012.667263

Zimmerman, B.J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key sub-processes? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307-313.

Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. doi: 10.3102/0002831207312909

How to Cite
Gargallo, B., Suárez-Rodríguez, J. M., Almerich, G., Verde, I., & Cebrià i Iranzo, M. Àngels. (2018). The dimensional validation of the Student Engagement Questionnaire (SEQ) with a Spanish university population. Students’ capabilities and the teaching-learning environment. Anales De Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 34(3), 519-530.
Developmental and Educational Psychology