Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) as predictor of ADHD: performance between SCT rates and "Hyperactivity/Impulsivity" and "inattention" domains of ADHD in a clinical sample.
Introduction: Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is an international screening tool widely used for research and clinical practice on child and adolescents. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between SDQ indices and “Hyperactivity/Impulsivity" and "inattention" domains of specific ADHD scale. Method: The SDQ and ADHD-RS-IV were administered to parents and teachers of a sample of 212 children aged between 6 and 16 years old with a prior diagnosis of ADHD. Results: A significant relationship between "Hyperactivity/inattention" Scale (SDQ) and "hyperactivity/impulsivity" and "inattention" ADHD dimensions was confirmed. However, other SDQ scales were also related, depending of informant and ADHD domain. For the family, "hyperactivity/impulsivity" domain was related with high scores on "behavior problems" scale, while the "inattention" was related with "emotional symptoms" scale. Conclusions: This results suggest the possibility of to take into account rating scores on SCT scales to increase the sensitivity of the scale to discriminate ADHD clinical subtypes.
Achenbach, T. M., Becker, A., Döpfner, M., Heiervang, E., Roessner, V., Steinhausen, H., y Rothenberger, A. (2008). Multicultural assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology with ASEBA and SDQ instruments: Research findings, applications, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49 (3), 251-275.
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington DC: DSM-IV.
Brøndbo, P. H., Mathiassen, B., Martinussen, M., Heiervang, E., Eriksen, M., Moe, T. F., ... Kvernmo, S. (2011). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a screening instrument for norwegian child and adolescent mental health services, application of UK scoring algorithms. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 5, 32.
Gómez-Beneyto, M., Nolasco, A., Moncho, J., Peereyra-Zamora, P., Tamayo-Fonseca, N., Munarriz, M. ... Girón, M. (2013). Psychometric behaviour of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in the Spanish national health survey 2006. BMC Psychiatry, 13 (95), 1-10. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-13-95
Goodman, R. (1994). A modified version ofthe Rutter parent questionnaire including items on children's strengths: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1483-1494.
Goodman R (1997) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581-586.
Goodman, A., Heiervang, E., Fleitlich-bilyk, B., Alyahri, A., Patel, V., Mullick, M. S., ... Goodman, R. (2012). Cross-national differences in questionnaires do not necessarily reflect comparable differences in disorder prevalence. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47 (8), 1321-1331.
Goodman A, Lamping D. L., y Ploubidis, G. B (2010). When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 1179-1191.
He, J., Burstein, M., Schmitz, A., y Merikangas, K. R. (2013). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): The factor structure and scale validation in U.S. adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41 (4), 583-595.
Kuntsi, J., Neale, B. M., Chen, W., Faraone, S. V., y Asherson, P. (2006). The IMAGE project: methodological issues for the molecular genetic analysis of ADHD. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2, 27.
Niclasen, J., Skovgaard, A. M., Andersen, A-M. N., Sømhovd, M. J., y Obel, C. (2013). A Confirmatory Approach to Examining the Factor Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): A Large Scale Cohort Study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41 (3), 355-365.
Opler, M., Sodhi, D., Zaveri, D., y Madhusoodanan, S. (2010). Primary psychiatric prevention in children and adolescents. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 22 (4), 220-234.
Rutter, M. (1967). A children’s behaviour questionnaire for completion by teachers: Preliminary findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 1–11.
Russell, G., Rodgers, L. R., y Ford, T. (2013). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a predictor of parent-reported diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. PLoS One, 8 (12).
Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Engels, R. C., M., E., Vermulst, A. A., y Janssens, J. M. A. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13 (3), 254-274.
Ullebø, A. K., Posserud, M., Heiervang, E., Gillberg, C., y Obel, C. (2011). Screening for the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder phenotype using the strength and difficulties questionnaire. European Child y Adolescent Psychiatry, 20 (9), 451-458.
Van Roy, B., Veenstra, M., y Clench-Aas, J. (2008). Construct validity of the five-factor strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 49 (12), 1304-1312.
Woerner, W., Fleitlich-Bilyk, B., Martinussen, R., Fletcher, J., Cucchiaro, G., Dalgalarrondo, P., ... Tannock, R. (2004). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire overseas: Evaluations and applications of the SDQ beyond Europe. European Child y Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, (suppl. 2), 47-54.
World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders diagnostic criteria for research.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.