Forewarning of the Persuasive Attempt in Advertising Contexts
AbstractForewarning of a persuasive attempt has been found to reduce persuasion because people tend to resist being manipulated. Likewise, messages that are high in ambiguity tend to be less persuasive than messages that are clear, among other reasons, because people prefer information that is easy to be processed. The present research postulates that these two variables (persuasive attempt forewarning and message ambiguity) can result paradoxically persuasive when combined together. Participants of the present experiment received a message composed by images that were presented in a logic (low ambiguity) or in a random order (high ambiguity). Furthermore, the message was said to be a commercial advertisement or a neutral narrative. As predicted, it was found that the highly ambiguous message was more persuasive when it was presented as an advertisement rather than as a narrative context. Paradoxically, knowing that the message constitutes a persuasive attempt (ad) could bias the generation of thoughts to interpret that information in a positive manner (consonant with the direction of the arguments supposedly contained in the ad), leading to more attitude change.
Alter, A.L., y Oppenheimer, D.M. (2006). Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 9369-9372.
Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., y Wright, P. (2009). Deception in the marketplace. New York, NY: Routledge.
Brehm, J.W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Briñol, P., y DeMarree, K. G. (Eds.). (2012). Social metacognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Briñol, P., Petty, R.E., y Tormala, Z.L. (2006). The meaning of ease and its malleability. Psychological Science, 17, 200-206.
Brown, C.L., y Krishna, A. (2004). The skeptical shopper: A metacognitive account for the effects of default options on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 529-539.
Calfee, J.E., y Ringold, D.J. (1994). The 70% majority: Enduring consumer beliefs about advertising. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13, 228–238.
Campbell, M.C., y Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 69-83.
Cialdini, R.B., y Petty, R.E. (1981): Anticipatory opinion effects. En R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, y T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (217-235). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Cialdini, R.B., y Trost, M.R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. En D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, y G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, (4th ed., pp. 151-192). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dunlosky, J., y Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Friestad, M., y Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1-31.
Friestad, M., y Wright, P. (1995). Persuasion knowledge: Lay people’s and researches’ beliefs about the psychology of persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 123-156.
Fukada, H. (1986). Psychological processes mediating the persuasion inhibiting effect or forewarning in fear arousing communication, Psychological Reports, 58, 87-90.
Green, M.C., y Brock, T.C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
Greenwald, A.G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. En A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock y T. M. Ostrom (Eds), Psychological foundations of attitudes. New York: Academic Press.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. En P. Cole y J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Hass, R.G., y Grady, K. (1975). Temporal delay, type of forewarning, and resistance to influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 459-469.
Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., y Kelley, H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jiménez-Morales, M. (2005). Selling me softly, la persuasión sutil: influencia del product placement en las audiencias infantiles de las teleseries. Comunicar, 25.
Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 137-154.
Kirmani, A., y Campbell, M. C. (2004). Goal seeker and persuasion sentry: How consumer targets respond to interpersonal marketing persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 573–582.
Kirmani, A., y Zhu, R. (2007). Vigilant against manipulation: The effects of regulatory focus on the use of persuasion knowledge. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 688-701.
Lowrey, T.M. (1998). The effects of syntactic complexity on advertising persuasiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 187-206.
Petty, R. E. & Briñol, P. (2012). The Elaboration Likelihood Model. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol.1, pp. 224-245). London, England: Sage.
Petty, R.E., y Cacioppo, J.T. (1979). Effects of forewarning of persuasive intent on cognitive responses and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 173-176.
Petty, R.E., y Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. En L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
Petty, R.E., Ostrom, T.M., y Brock, T.C. (1981). Historical foundations of the cognitive response approach to attitudes and persuasion. En R. E Petty, T. M Ostrom, y T. C Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 5-29). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum
Quinn, J. M., y Wood, W. (2004). Forewarnings of influence appeals: Inducing resistance and acceptance. En E. S. Knowles y J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and Persuasion (pp.193-213). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., y Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48
Rucker, D. D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2012). Metacognitive theory in consumer research. In P. Briñol & K. G. DeMarree (Eds.), Social Metacognition (pp. 303-321). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Sorrentino, R. M., Bobocel, C. R., Gitta, M. Z., Olson, J. M., y Hewitt, E. C. (1988). Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 357-371
Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., y Petty, R. E. (2006). When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 684-691.
Tormala, Z. L., Falces, C., Briñol, P., y Petty, R. E. (2007). Ease of retrieval effects in social judgment: The role of unrequested cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 143-157
Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., y Chin, J. (2007). Feeling duped: Emotional, motivational, and cognitive aspects of being exploited by others. Review of General Psychology, 11,127–141.
Walster, E., y Festinger, L. (1962). The effectiveness of 'overheard' persuasive communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 395-402.
Zuwerink, J.R., y Devine, P.G. (1996). Attitude strength and resistance to persuasion: It’s more than just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 931-944.
Copyright (c) 2014 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.