La evaluación de candidatos en un proceso de selección de personal: Preferencia por la experiencia sobre el potencial en contextos desfavorables
Resumen
The present research´s main goal is to find out how one responds to the organizational context and the candidate profile in a job candidate evaluation context. With that purpose, we ran an experiment with a sample of participants trained in personnel selection. Participants first received a message in which it was specified that the future of a given organization was unfavorable or favorable. Then, participants were asked to evaluate a potential job candidate to join such organization. The candidate was described in terms of her high previous experience or in terms of her high potential as a professional. Our a priori hypothesis was that there would be a higher preference for experience relative to potential, particularly under unfavorable context. As predicted, results showed that under unfavorable contextual conditions, attitudes towards the candidate were more favorable when the job candidate was portrayed in terms of experience (vs potential). Under favorable contextual conditions, attitudes towards the candidate did not vary as a function of her profile.
Descargas
Citas
Barnett, C. K., & Pratt, M. G. (2000). From threat-rigidity to flexibility-Toward a learning model of autogenic crisis in organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(1), 74-88, https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810010310258
Baumeister, R. F., & Jones, E. E. (1978). When self-presentation is constrained by the target's knowledge: Consistency and compensation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(6), 608-618, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.6.608
Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2009). Persuasion: Insights from the self‐validation hypothesis. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 69-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00402-4
Briñol, P., Cárdaba, M. Á., Gallardo, I., & Horcajo, J. (2015). La advertencia del intento persuasivo en contextos publicitarios. Anales de Psicología, 31(1), 184-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.1.158241
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Barden, J. (2007). Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 711-727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.711
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Stavraki, M. (2012). Power increases the reliance on first-impression thoughts. Revista de Psicología Social, 27(3), 293-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021347412802845513
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Wheeler, S. C. (2006). Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 154-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.154
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Gallardo, I., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The effect of self-affirmation in nonthreatening persuasion domains: Timing affects the process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(11), 1533-1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207306282
Brinol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. D., & Becerra, A. (2007). The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1040-1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1040
Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 313-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392145
Eisenkraft, N., Elfenbein, H. A., & Kopelman, S. (2017). We know who likes us, but not who competes against us: Dyadic meta-accuracy among work colleagues. Psychological Science, 28(2), 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616679440
Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2004). Work value congruence and intrinsic career success: the compensatory roles of leader‐member exchange and perceived organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 57(2), 305-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02493.x
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself: An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181722
Gay, P. (1989). The Freud reader. New York: Norton.
Gertsen, M. C., Søderberg, A. M., & Torp, J. E. (Eds.). (1998). Cultural dimensions of international mergers and acquisitions (Vol. 85). Walter de Gruyter.
Gärling, T., Kirchler, E., Lewis, A., & Van Raaij, F. (2009). Psychology, financial decision making, and financial crises. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610378437
Hart, J. (2014). Toward an integrative theory of psychological defense. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 19-39. doi: 10.1177/1745691613506018
Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 88-110. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1
Hogg, M. A. (2012). Uncertainty-identity theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 62–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hogg, M. A., Meehan, C., & Farquharson, J. (2010). The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1061-1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.005
Horcajo, J., Díaz, D., Gandarillas, B., & Briñol, P. (2011). Adaptación al castellano del Test de Necesidad de Cierre Cognitivo. Psicothema, 23(4), 864-870
Horcajo, J., See, M., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2008). The role of mortality salience in consumer persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 35, 782-783.
Johnson, I. R., Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & See, Y. H. M. (2017). Persuasive message scrutiny as a function of implicit-explicit discrepancies in racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 222-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.007
Jonas, E., McGregor, I., Klackl, J., Agroskin, D., Fritsche, I., Holbrook, C., Nash, K., Proulx, T., & Quirin, M. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 219-286). San Diego, Ca: Academic Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 264-268. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W. W. Norton.
Ko, S. J., Sadler, M. S., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). The sound of power: Conveying and detecting hierarchical rank through voice. Psychological Science, 26(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614553009
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). The psychology of being" right": The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 395-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.3.395
Kupor, D. M., Tormala, Z. L., & Norton, M. I. (2014). The allure of unknown outcomes: Exploring the role of uncertainty in the preference for potential. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 210-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.004
León, O. G., & Montero, I. (2003). Métodos de investigación en psicología y educación (3rd ed.). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality (Donald K. Adams & Karl E. Zaner, Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Loewenstein, G., (1994). The psychology of curiosity. A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S., (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.13
Martin, L. L. (1999). I-D Compensation Theory: Some Implications of Trying to Satisfy Immediate-Return Needs in a Delayed-Return Culture. Psychological Inquiry, 10(3), 195. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1003_1
McGregor, I., & Marigold, D. C. (2003). Defensive zeal and the uncertain self: What makes you so sure? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 838-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.838
McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 472-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.472
McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 472-488. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.472
Nelson, S. C., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2014). Uncertainty, risk, and the financial crisis of 2008. International Organization, 68(2), 361-392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000416
Poehlman, T. A., & Newman, G. E. (2014). Potential: The valuation of imagined future achievement. Cognition, 130(1), 134-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.003
Proulx, T. (2012). Threat-Compensation in Social Psychology: Is There a Core Motivation? Social Cognition, 30(6), 643-651. doi: 10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.643
Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2006). Intuitive confidence: choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(3), 409-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.409
Sorrentino, R. M., & Short, J.-A. C. (1986). Uncertainty orientation, motivation, and cognition. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 379-403). New York: Guilford Press.
Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S., (2001). Judgement under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emtions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973-988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973
Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Attitude certainty: A review of past findings and emerging perspectives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 469-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00025.x
Tormala, Z., Jia, J. S., & Norton, M. I. (2012). The preference for potential. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 567-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029227
Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Wan, E. W., Rucker, D. D., Tormala, Z. L., & Clarkson, J. J. (2010). The effect of regulatory depletion on attitude certainty. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 531-541. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.3.531
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
Wilson, T. D., Centerbar, D. B., Kermer, D. A., & Gilbert, D. (2005). The pleasures of uncertainty:Prolonguing positive moods in ways people do not anticipate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 5-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.5
Young, S. G. (2017). An outgroup advantage in discriminating between genuine and posed smiles. Self and Identity, 16(3), 298-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1270851
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2024
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
