Uso de redes sociales en adolescentes: motivación, estrés de minorías y bienestar eudaimónico
Resumen
Introduction: The scientific evidence regarding the effects of online social media use on the well-being of adolescents is mixed. In general, passive uses (receiving, viewing content without interacting) and more screen time are related to lower well-being when compared with active uses (direct interactions and interpersonal exchanges). Objectives: This study examines the types and motives for social media usage amongst adolescents, differentiating them by gender identity and sexual orientation, as well as its effects on eudaimonic well-being and minority stress. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 1259 adolescents, aged 14 to 19 (M = 16.19; SD = 1.08), analysing the Scale of Motives for Using Social Networking Sites, eudaimonic well-being, the Sexual Minority Adolescent Stress Inventory, screen time and profile type. Results: The results found that longer use time is related to finding partners, social connection and friendships; that gay and bisexual (GB) adolescents perceive more distal stressors online; and that females have higher levels of well-being. Discussion: The public profiles of GB males increase self-expression, although minority stress can be related to discrimination, rejection or exclusion. Differentiated socialization may contribute to a higher level of well-being in females, with both active and passive uses positively effecting eudaimonic well-being in adolescents.
Descargas
Citas
Appel, M., Marker, C. & Gnambs, T. (2020). Are social media ruining our lives? A review of meta-analytic evidence. Review of General Psychology. 24(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019880891
Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. En P. Pajares y T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescent (pp. 1-43). Information Age Publishing.
Birnholtz, J., & Macapagal, K. (2021). “I don't want to be known for that:” The role of temporality in online self-presentation of young gay and bisexual males. Computers in human behavior, 118, 106706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106706
Brandt, S., & Carmichael, Ch. (2020). Does online support matter? The relationship between online identity-related support, mattering, and well-being in sexual minority men. Computer in Human Behavior, 111, 106429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106429
Bucknell C., & Kottasz, R. (2020). Uses and gratifications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers. Young Consumers, 21(4), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2020-1186
Camp, J., Vitoratou, S., & Rimes, K. (2020). LGBQ+ self-acceptance and its relationship with minority stressors and mental health: A systematic literature review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(7), 2353–2373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01755-2
Course-Choi, J., & Hammond, L. (2021). Social media use and adolescent well-being: A narrative review of longitudinal studies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(4), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0020
Escobar-Viera C., Whitfield D., Wessel C., Shensa A., Sidani J., Brown A., Chandler C., Hoffman B., Marshal M. & Primack, B. (2018). For better or for worse? a systematic review of the evidence on social media use and depression among lesbian, gay, and bisexual minorities. JMIR Ment Health, 5(3), e10496, https://doi.org/10.2196/10496
Filice, E., Raffoul, A., Meyer, S., & Neiterman, E. (2020). The impact of social media on body image perceptions and bodily practices among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: A critical review of the literature and extension of theory. Sex Roles, 82(7), 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01063-7
Fox, J., & Ralston, R. (2016). Queer identity online: Informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.009
Gudelunas, D. (2012). There’s an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality & Culture, 16(4), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9127-4
Johnson, K., Vilceanu, M., & Pontes, M. (2017). Use of online dating websites and dating apps: Findings and implications for LGB populations. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 11(3), 60–66. https://articlegateway.com/index.php/JMDC/article/view/1623
Kerestes G., & Stulhofer A. (2020). Adolescents’ online social network use and life satisfaction: A latent growth curve modeling approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106187
Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Sheppes, G., Costello, C., Jonides, J., & Ybarra, O. (2021). Social media and well-being: pitfalls, progress, and next steps. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.005
LeFebvre, A., & Huta, V. (2021). Age and gender differences in eudaimonic, hedonic, and extrinsic motivations. Journal of happiness studies, 22(5), 2299-2321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00319-4
Litt, E., Zhao, S., Kraut, R., & Burke, M. (2020). What are meaningful social interactions in today’s media landscape? A cross-cultural survey. Social Media + Society. 6(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120942888
Lutz, S., & Schneider, F. M. (2021). Is receiving dislikes in social media still better than being ignored? The effects of ostracism and rejection on need threat and coping responses online. Media Psychology, 24 (6), 741–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1799409
Meier, A., Gilbert, A., Börner, S., & Possler, D. (2020). Instagram inspiration: How upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being. Journal of Communication, 70(5), 721–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa025
Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2021). Social media and mental health: reviewing effects on eudaimonic well-being. In Robin L. Nabi &Jessica Gall Myrick (Eds). Emotions in the digital world: Exploring affective experience and expression in online interactions. Oxford Univ. Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xvts8
Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2020). Computer-mediated communication, social media, and mental health: A conceptual and empirical meta-review. Communication Research, 48(8), 1182–1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220958224
Meyer, I. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
Mittmann, G., Woodcock, K., Dörfler, S., Krammer, I., Pollak, I. & Schrank, B. (2021). “TikTok Is My Life and Snapchat Is My Ventricle”: A mixed-methods study on the role of online communication tools for friendships in early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 42(2), 172–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316211020368
Mondal, M., Silva, L. A., & Benevenuto, F. (2017, July 04-07). A measurement study of hate speech in social media. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM conference on hypertext and social media (pp. 85–94). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3078714.3078723
Orben, A. (2020). Teenagers, screens and social media: A narrative review of reviews and key studies. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 55, 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01825-4
Orben, A., Przybylski, A., Blakemore, S., & Kievit, R. (2022). Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media. Nature Communications, 13, 1649. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29296-3
Pertegal, M. Á., Oliva, A., & Rodríguez-Meirinhos, A. (2019). Development and validation of the Scale of Motives for Using Social Networking Sites (SMU-SNS) for adolescents and youths. PloS one, 14(12), e0225781. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225781
Saha, K., Kim, S., Reddy, M., Carter, A., Sharma, E., Haimson, O., & De Choudhury, M. (2019). The language of LGBTQ+ minority stress experiences on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 3(CSCW), 89. https://doi.org/10.1145/3361108
Salavera, C., & Usán, P. (2019). Propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario QEWB de bienestar eudaimónico en adolescentes [Psychometric properties of the QEWB questionnaire of eudaimonic well-being in adolescents]. Psicología Educativa, 25(2), 139 – 146. https://www.doi.org/10.5093/psed2019a3
Schrager, S., Goldbach, J. T., & Mamey, M. (2018). Development of the sexual minority adolescent stress inventory. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00319
Schutte, L., Wissing, M., & Khumalo, I. (2013). Further validation of the questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being (QEWB). Psychology of Well-being, 3(3), 1–22. http://www.psywb.com/content/3/1/3
Selkie, E., Adkins, V., Masters, E., Bajpai, A., & Shumer, D. (2020). Transgender adolescents' uses of social media for social support. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(3), 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.011
Sumter, S., Cingel, D., & Hollander, L. (2022). Navigating a muscular and sexualized Instagram feed: An experimental study examining how Instagram affects both heterosexual and nonheterosexual men’s body image. Psychology of Popular Media, 11(2), 125. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ppm0000355
Throuvala, M., Griffiths, M., Rennoldson, M. & Kuss, D. (2019). Motivational processes and dysfunctional mechanisms of social media use among adolescents: A qualitative focus group study. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.012
Toma, C. (2017). Taking the good with the bad: Effects of Facebook self-presentation on emotional well-being. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 170–182). Routledge.
UNICEF (2022). Impacto de la tecnología en la adolescencia [Impact of technology on adolescence]. https://www.unicef.es/publicacion/impacto-de-la-tecnologia-en-la-adolescencia
Valkenburg, P. (2022). Social media use and well-being: What we know and what we need to know. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.006
Verduyn, P., Gugushvili, N. & Kross, E. (2022). Do social networking sites influence well-being? the extended active-passive model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211053637
Verduyn P., Ybarra O., Résibois M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/sipr.12033
Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna [A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability]. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 33(3), 755-782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401
Vohs, K., Aaker, J., & Catapano, R. (2019). It's not going to be that fun: Negative experiences can add meaning to life. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.014
Waterman, A., Schwartz, S., Zamboanga, B., Ravert, R., Williams, M., Agocha, V. & Donnellan, M. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903435208
Webster, D., Dunne, L., & Hunter, R. (2021). Association between social networks and subjective well-being in adolescents: a systematic review. Youth & Society, 53(2), 175–210. https://doi.org/0.1177/0044118X20919589
Yang, C., Holden, S., & Carter, M. (2018). Social media social comparison of ability (but not opinion) predicts lower identity clarity: Identity processing style as a mediator. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(10), 2114–2128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0801-6
Derechos de autor 2024 Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia (España)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
