Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament injury with and without anterolateral ligament reconstruction in patients with sports injury

Autores/as

  • Hossam Abdelghany Abdelsattar Orthopedic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
  • Emad Elbana Orthopedic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
  • Mohamed Alaaeldin Abdelrahman Orthopedic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
  • Ayman Abdelbaset Abdelsamad Orthopedic Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.672021
Palabras clave: Arthroscopic Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction, Patients, Sports Injury

Resumen

The current study aimed to evaluate postoperative knee stability in cases with high grade pivot shift test treated with ACL reconstruction with ALL reconstruction versus cases treated with ACL reconstruction only. This prospective comparative randomized study involved 40 patients with unilateral single ligamentous ACL injuries exhibiting advanced pivot shift test results. Patients were classified equally into two cohorts: Group I received solo ACL repair (ACLR), whereas Group II got ACL reconstruction with ALL reconstruction (ALLR). The postoperative scores from the International Knee Documentation Committee, Cincinnati, Lysholm, and Tegner were considerably elevated in the ACLR + ALLR group compared to the ACLR group (p<0.05), with notable improvements seen in both groups (p<0.05). The negative post-operative Lachman and Pivot shift tests were substantially greater in the ACLR + ALLR group than the ACLR group (p<0.05), and there was a high improvement pre- and post-operatively in the ACLR + ALLR group (p<0.05). The anterior drawer test demonstrated a substantial enhancement in both groups (P<0.05). Post-operative effusion exhibited a wide variation between groups (p<0.05), and there was a notable improvement in both groups (p<0.05). Post-operative pain was considerably reduced in the ACLR + ALLR group compared to the ACLR group (p<0.05), with notable improvement seen in both groups (p<0.05). The single leg hop test showed considerable improvement in both groups (p<0.05). Postoperative patient satisfaction exhibited a statistical variation between groups (p<0.05). Additional rotational stability is achieved through ACL + ALLR reconstruction, which enhances the likelihood of professional athletes returning to sports activities.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Metrics
Vistas/Descargas
  • Resumen
    349
  • PDF
    161

Citas

Abid, M., Mezghani, N., & Mitiche, A. (2019). Knee Joint Biomechanical Gait Data Classification for Knee Pathology Assessment: A Literature Review. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2019, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7472039

Ariel de Lima, D., Helito, C. P., Daggett, M., Neto, F. M. M., de Lima, L. L., Leite, J. A. D., & Cavalcante, M. L. C. (2019). Anterolateral ligament of the knee: a step-by-step dissection. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2517-0

Arthur, J. R., Haglin, J. M., Makovicka, J. L., & Chhabra, A. (2020). Anatomy and biomechanics of the posterior cruciate ligament and their surgical implications. Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, 28, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0000000000000267

Carter, H. M., Littlewood, C., Webster, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2020). The effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03676-6

Charalambous, C. (2023). Complications in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: Rates of occurrence, prevention, and management [Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Lancashire].

Ferretti, A., Monaco, E., Ponzo, A., Basiglini, L., Iorio, R., Caperna, L., et al. (2016). Combined intra-articular and extra-articular reconstruction in anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knee: 25 years later. Arthroscopy, 32, 2039–2047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.02.006

Marcacci, M., Zaffagnini, S., Giordano, G., Iacono, F., & Lo Presti, M. (2009). Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction associated with extra-articular tenodesis: A prospective clinical and radiographic evaluation with 10-to 13-year follow-up. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 37, 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508328114

Trichine, F., Chouteau, J., Moyen, B., Bouzitouna, M., & Maza, R. (2014). Patellar tendon autograft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with and without lateral plasty in advanced-stage chronic laxity: A clinical, prospective, randomized, single-blind study using passive dynamic X-rays. The Knee, 21, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.06.001

Vadalà, A. P., Iorio, R., De Carli, A., Bonifazi, A., Iorio, C., Gatti, A., Rossi, C., & Ferretti, A. (2013). An extra-articular procedure improves the clinical outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings in female athletes. International Orthopaedics, 37(2), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1571-0

Zaffagnini, S., Marcacci, M., Lo Presti, M., Giordano, G., Iacono, F., & Neri, M. P. (2006). Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: A clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 14, 1060–1069.

Publicado
17-07-2025
Cómo citar
Abdelghany Abdelsattar, H., Elbana, E., Alaaeldin Abdelrahman, M., & Abdelbaset Abdelsamad, A. (2025). Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament injury with and without anterolateral ligament reconstruction in patients with sports injury. SPORT TK-Revista EuroAmericana De Ciencias Del Deporte, 14, 65. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.672021
Número
Vol. 14 (2025)
Sección
Artículos

Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:

1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.

© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013

2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.


Licencia Creative Commons

3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.

Open policy finder