Impact of handedness on electromyographic activity of hand muscles and nerve conduction velocity during mobile phone use in adolescents
Resumen
This study investigated the impact of handedness on electromyographic (EMG) activity of hand muscles and nerve conduction velocity during smartphone use and compared the effects of left- and right-handedness on hand muscle activation and nerve conduction velocities. This interventional parallel study included 70 participants (35 left-handed, 35 right-handed) aged 12 to 14 years. EMG activity and nerve conduction velocities (radial, median, and ulnar nerves) were measured before and after 10 minutes of smartphone use. Muscle activation was assessed for the abductor pollicis longus (APL), extensor carpi radialis (ECR), flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), and first dorsal interosseous muscles. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 27. Left-handed participants exhibited significantly greater activation in all assessed muscles during smartphone use (p < 0.05). Specifically, the activation of the APL, ECR, FCU, and first dorsal interosseous muscles was higher in left-handed individuals. Sensory ulnar and median nerve conduction velocities were significantly higher in right-handed subjects during smartphone use (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in motor nerve conduction velocities. The study demonstrates that handedness influences neuromuscular activity during smartphone use, with left-handed individuals showing greater muscle activation and right-handed individuals exhibiting higher sensory nerve conduction velocities.
Descargas
Citas
Adam, A., Luca, C. J. D., & Erim, Z. (1998). Hand dominance and motor unit firing behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80(3), 1373-1382. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1373
Borod, J. C., Caron, H. S., & Koff, E. (1984). Left‐handers and right‐handers compared on performance and preference measures of lateral dominance. British Journal of Psychology, 75(2), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01889.x
Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1987). The measurement of handedness. Brain and Cognition, 6(2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(87)90118-7
Corey, D. M., Hurley, M. M., & Foundas, A. L. (2001). Right and left handedness defined: A multivariate approach using hand preference and hand performance measures. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 14(3), 144-152.
Diederichsen, L. P., Nørregaard, J., Dyhre-Poulsen, P., Winther, A., Tufekovic, G., Bandholm, T., Rasmussen, L. R., & Krogsgaard, M. (2007). The effect of handedness on electromyographic activity of human shoulder muscles during movement. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 17(4), 410-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.08.006
Duthilleul, N., Pirondini, E., Coscia, M., & Micera, S. (2015). Effect of handedness on muscle synergies during upper limb planar movements. In 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 3701-3704). IEEE.
Frayer, D. W., Lozano, M., Bermudez de Castro, J. M., Carbonell, E., Arsuaga, J. L., Radovčić, J., Fiore, I., & Bondioli, L. (2012). More than 500,000 years of right-handedness in Europe. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 17(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2010.529451
Galamandjuk, L., Siedlaczek-Szwed, A., Iedynak, G., Dutchak, M., Stasjuk, I., Prozar, M., Mazur, V., Bakhmat, N., Veselovska, T., & Kljus, O. (2019). Evaluation of the physiological characteristics of girls with different handedness using various types of physical training. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19, 1386-1390.
Giovagnoli, A. R., & Parisi, A. (2024). Fifty years of handedness research: A neurological and methodological update. Brain Sciences, 14(5), 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14050418
Gutwinski, S., Löscher, A., Mahler, L., Kalbitzer, J., Heinz, A., & Bermpohl, F. (2011). Understanding left-handedness. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 108(50), 849-853. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2011.0849
Liang, D., Yarossi, M., Jacobs-Skolik, S. L., Furmanek, M. P., Brooks, D., Erdogmus, D., & Tunik, E. (2021). Synergistic activation patterns of hand muscles in left-and right-hand dominant individuals. Journal of Human Kinetics, 76(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2021-0002
Mcsp, I. C. B., & Dipcot, J. A. (2003). A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand function in both right- and left-handed individuals using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP). The British Journal of Hand Therapy, 8(1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/175899830300800101
Ní Choisdealbha, Á., Brady, N., & Maguinness, C. (2011). Differing roles for the dominant and non-dominant hands in the hand laterality task. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2652-9
Papadatou-Pastou, M., Ntolka, E., Schmitz, J., Martin, M., Munafò, M. R., Ocklenburg, S., & Paracchini, S. (2020). Human handedness: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(6), 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000229
Seizeur, R., Magro, E., Prima, S., Wiest-Daesslé, N., Maumet, C., & Morandi, X. (2014). Corticospinal tract asymmetry and handedness in right-and left-handers by diffusion tensor tractography. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 36, 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1156-7
Triggs, W. J., Calvanio, R., Macdonell, R. A., Cros, D., & Chiappa, K. H. (1994). Physiological motor asymmetry in human handedness: Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Research, 636(2), 270-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(94)91026-x
Wright, S. (1934). Physiological and evolutionary theories of dominance. The American Naturalist, 68(714), 24-53.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.