Analysis of the implementation of the 11th ASEAN Para Games in Indonesia

Authors

  • Margareta Suryani Faculty of Sports, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.
  • Sapta Kunta Purnama Faculty of Sports, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.
  • Fadilah Umar Faculty of Sports, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.
  • Slamet Riyadi Faculty of Sports, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.594031
Keywords: Implementation, 11th ASEAN Para Games, Indonesia, CIPP Model

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the evaluation of the implementation of the 11th ASEAN Para Games in Indonesia, where there was a transfer of hosts, and Indonesia agreed to organize the event following a 2-year hiatus. The research employed an evaluation method within the qualitative research category. Specifically, the study used the CIPP model for evaluation, with data collected through a questionnaire and observation. The CIPP assessment was conducted both during and at the end of the ASEAN Para Games in Indonesia in 2022. The population of this study comprised all Indonesian athletes who participated in the 2022 ASEAN Para Games in Bengawan, Indonesia. The research subjects included the NPC, KEMENPORA, PELATNAS, and the government, totaling 115 people. Based on the analysis, the 11th ASEAN Para Games in Indonesia in 2022, evaluated using the CIPP method, was successful. Content, input, process, and product evaluations all rated in the moderate category, with scores ranging from 66.7% to 93.3% across competition managers, managers and officials, coaches, athletes, and support personnel, indicating satisfactory performance. Overall, the evaluation results reveal that the implementation of the 11th ASEAN Para Games in Indonesia in 2022 was conducted quite well, adhering to the rules and standards for international sports events.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adi, S. (2020). Kepuasan Stakeholder Dalam Olahraga Multi Event Sebagai Modal Sport Marketing [Stakeholder satisfaction in multi-event sports as a basis for sports marketing]. Jurnal Sport Science, 10(1), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.17977/um057v10i1p42-52

Aldapit, E., & Suharjana, S. (2019). CIPP evaluation model for the coaching program of running athletes. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 1(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v1i2.10

Anh, V. T. K. (2018). Evaluation Models in Educational Program: Strengths and Weaknesses. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(2), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4252

Basaran, M., Dursun, B., Gur Dortok, H. D., & Yilmaz, G. (2021). Evaluation of Preschool Education Program According to CIPP Model. Pedagogical Research, 6(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/9701

Bin Abdullah, N. M., Govindasamy, M., Zaharudin, M. S., & Nair, S. R. (2021). Paralympic Movement in Malaysia: The Achievement of High-Performance Para Sports. Journal Sport Area, 6(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2021.vol6(1).5504

Brooke, M., & Khoo, S. (2021). Insider perspectives on the sustainability of the malaysian and singaporean paralympic movements. Sustainability, 13(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105557

Danermark, B., Cieza, A., Gangé, J. P., Gimigliano, F., Granberg, S., Hickson, L., Kramer, S. E., McPherson, B., Möller, C., Russo, I., Strömgren, J. P., Stucki, G., & Swanepoel, D. (2010). International classification of functioning, disability, and health core sets for hearing loss: A discussion paper and invitation. International Journal of Audiology, 49(4), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020903410110

Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., MacLure, M., Otterstad, A. M., Torrance, H., Cannella, G. S., & McTier, T. (2017). Critical qualitative methodologies: Reconceptualizations and emergent construction. International Review of Qualitative Research, 10(4), 482–498. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2017.10.4.482

Gatua, J. W., & Box, P. O. (2015). A Study on Involvement of Stakeholders in the Implementation of Safety Guidelines in Public Secondary Schools in Nairobi West. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(4), 37–43.

Hidayati, A. N., Hadiprawiro, Y., & Dawami, A. K. (2019). Representasi City Branding Jakarta melalui Identitas Merek Asian Para Games 2018. Jurnal Desain, 6(3), 186-194. https://doi.org/10.30998/jd.v6i3.3652

Kasih, A. M., Hidayatullah, M. F., & Doewes, M. (2021). Evaluation of Boccia Sports Achievement Coaching Program using Cipp Model at the Boccia NPC Indonesia National Training Center. Journal of Humanities and Education Development, 3(3), 144–147. https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.3.3.15

Khairoh, J., Argantos, Arsi, A., & Nasir, G. (2020). Evaluasi Program Pembinaan Prestasi Olahraga Renang Di PRSI Kabupaten Sarolangun. Jurnal Menssana, 5(2), 182–190.

Kudla, D., Kujur, J., Tigga, S., Tirkey, P., Rai, P., & Fegg, M. J. (2015). Meaning in life experience at the end of life: Validation of the hindi version of the schedule for meaning in life evaluation and a cross-cultural comparison between Indian and German palliative care patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 49(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.013

Lee, S. Y., Shin, J. S., & Lee, S. H. (2019). How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 16, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3352/JEEHP.2019.16.40

Lisna, Y. P., Muhardiansyah, D., & Prabowo, E. (2022). Analysis of Organizing Sport Event Tour De Singkarak in West Sumatera. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keluarga, 13(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.24036/jpk/

Mair, J., Chien, P. M., Kelly, S. J., & Derrington, S. (2023). Social impacts of mega-events: a systematic narrative review and research agenda. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(2), 538–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1870989

Miles, L., & Shipway, R. (2020). Exploring the COVID-19 pandemic as a catalyst for stimulating future research agendas for managing crises and disasters at international sport events. Event Management, 24(4), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599519X15506259856688

Moch, A. (2021). Evaluation Program: Seven-A-Side Football Coaching National Paralympic Committee (NPC) of Indonesian at ASEAN Para Games 2015 in Singapore. Journal of New Studies in Sport Management, 2(4), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.22103/JNSSM.2021.18516.1040

Ouyang, Z., Gursoy, D., & Chen, K. C. (2019). It’s all about life: Exploring the role of residents’ quality of life perceptions on attitudes toward a recurring hallmark event over time. Tourism Management, 75, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.04.032

Purnomo, A. B., Sulistyanto, I., & Rully. (2019). Perencanaan Dan Perancangan Solo Exhibition and Convention Center Di Surakarta (Berpendekatan High Technology Architecture) [Planning and Design of the Solo Exhibition and Convention Center in Surakarta (With a High Technology Architecture Approach)]. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Dan Arsitektur, 24(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36728/jtsa.v24i2.975

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2002). Cipp Evaluation Model Checklist. Evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.betterevaluation.org/sites/default/files/Stufflebeam_CIPP.pdf

Sulistianta, H., Siswoyo, J., & Kurniawan, C. (2021). Management Analysis of the Basketball Association Throughout Indonesia Lampung Province. Journal of Sport Education, 3(2), 63–74.

Trail, G. T., & McCullough, B. P. (2020). Marketing sustainability through sport: testing the sport sustainability campaign evaluation model. European Sport Management Quarterly, 20(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2019.1580301

Ziakas, V. (2023). Leveraging Sport Events for Tourism Development: The Event Portfolio Perspective. Journal of Global Sport Management, 8(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2020.1731700

Published
18-05-2024
How to Cite
Suryani, M., Purnama, S. K., Umar, F., & Riyadi , S. (2024). Analysis of the implementation of the 11th ASEAN Para Games in Indonesia. SPORT TK-EuroAmerican Journal of Sport Sciences, 13, 35. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.594031
Issue
Section
Articles