Digital literacy of physical education teachers in the 5.0 era
Abstract
Digital literacy is a factor that determines a teacher's technology usage in learning. An interesting situation is found when physical education must be conducted in contemporary style, but on the other hand, it must also be able to incorporate practice in the field. This study aimed to investigate the digital literacy level of physical education teachers. The sample in this study was high school teachers in Bojonegoro Regency, consisting of 12 physical education teachers. The sample selection technique used was total sampling. The type of this research is quantitative using a survey method. Data was collected using a questionnaire via Google Form. After the data were obtained and grouped, they were then analyzed using percentages. The outcome of this research was organized into three categories, respectively the low category of 25.06%, the medium one of 33.34%, and lastly the high category of 41.6%. Young teachers fill the high category in the level of digital technology usage. From the results of the Spearman test, the younger the teacher, the better the level of mastery in technology. The computer literacy of physical education teachers affects their use of technology in delivering learning. Several things are related to one another, namely digital literacy, signals, and internet usage.
Downloads
References
Adamakis, M., & Zounhia, K. (2013). Greek Undergraduate Physical Education Students’ Basic Computer Skills. The Physical Educator, 70, 135–154.
Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., Samah, B. A., & Fooi, F. S. (2009). Factors Affecting Teachers' Use of Information and Communication Technology. International Journal of Instruction, 2, 77-104.
Amhag, L., Hellström, L., & Stigmar, M. (2019). Teacher Educators’ Use of Digital Tools and Needs for Digital Competence in Higher Education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35, 1–18.
Anderson, S. E., & Putman, R. S. (2019). Special Education Teachers’ Experience, Confidence, Beliefs, and Knowledge About Integrating Technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(1), 37–50.
Ayers, S., & Housner, L. (2008). A Descriptive Analysis of Undergraduate PETE Programs. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 51–67.
Aypay, A., Çelik, H. C., & Sever, M. (2012). Technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11, 264–272.
Blundell, C., Lee, K. T., & Nykvist, S. (2016). Digital Learning in Schools: Conceptualizing the Challenges and Influences on Teacher Practice. Journal of Information Technology Education, 15, 535–560.
Brown, S. (2014). Conceptualizing digital literacies and digital ethics for sustainability education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(3), 280-290.
Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8, 136–155.
Buchanan, R. (2011). Paradox, Promise and Public Pedagogy: Implications of the Federal Government’s Digital Education Revolution. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 67-78.
Buchanan, R. (2012). Basic Literacy or New Literacies? Examining the Contradictions of Australia’ s Education Revolution. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(6), 97-110.
Buckingham, D. (2020). Epilogue: Rethinking digital literacy: Media education in the age of digital capitalism. Digital Education Review, 37, 230-239.
Comeau, J., & Cheng, T. (2013). Digital “tsunami” in higher education: Democratisation Movement towards Open and Free Education. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14, 198–224.
Cummiskey, M. (2011). There’s an App for That Smartphone Use in Health and Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 82, 24–30.
Drader, R. (2014). Using technology to engage students in outdoor education: Does it inhibit or benefit the students’ experience? Mount Royal Undergraduate Education Review, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29173/mruer119
Elliott, S., Stanec, A. D., McCollum, S., & Ann Stanley, M. (2007). Uses of the Internet by Health and Physical Education Teachers. Strategies, 20, 19-27.
Engen, B., Giæver, T. H., & Mifsud, L. (2015). Guidelines and Regulations for Teaching Digital Competence in Schools and Teacher Education: A Weak Link? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10, 69-83.
Gibbone, A., Rukavina, P., & Silverman, S. (2010). Technology Integration in Secondary Physical Education: Teachers’ Attitudes and Practice. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3, 1–14.
Godhe, A. (2019). Digital Literacies or Digital Competence: Conceptualizations in Nordic Curricula. Media and Communication, 7(2), 1-11.
Göktaş, Z. (2012). The Attitudes of Physical Education and Sport Students towards Information and Communication Technologies. TechTrends, 56, 22-30.
Haag, M. (2018). Digital Teaching and Digital Medicine: A national initiative is needed. Journal for Medical Education, 35(3), 43.
Hamzeh, W., Mershad, K., & Vetohin, S. (2019). Integrating technology into higher education: A case study in Lebanon. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9, 442–457.
Harman, K. (2011). Transformation in Teaching. Social Media Strategies in Higher Education.
Hetland, K., & Strand, B. (2010). A descriptive analysis of undergraduate PETE program in the Central District. The Journal of Research in Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport and Dance, 5, 3–9.
Katsioloudis, P. (2015). Aligning Technology Education Teaching with Brain Development. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16, 6–10.
Kiat, L.B., Dayana Abd Halim, N., & Binti Ibrahim, H. (2015). Issues and future trends in teaching physical education: A preliminary study. 2015 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), 75-80.
Kinash, S., Wood, K., & Knight, D. (2013). Digital immigrant teachers and digital native students. What happens to teaching? Learning and Teaching papers, 50, 055–058.
Konan, N. (2010). Computer literacy levels of teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2567–2571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.374
Konstantinidis, S. T., & Bamidis, P. D. (2016). Why decision support systems are important for medical education. Healthcare technology letters, 3(1), 56–60.
Kreijns, K., Vermeulen, M., Kirschner, P. A., Van Buuren, H., & Van Acker, F. (2013). Adopting the Integrative Model of Behaviour Prediction to explain teachers’ willingness to use ICT: a perspective for research on teachers’ ICT usage in pedagogical practices. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2012.754371
Lane, J. M. (2012). Developing the vision: Preparing teachers to deliver a digital world-class education system. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n4.7
Leight, J., & Bechtel, P. A. (2010). Technology Utilization. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 81(6), 53–56.
Madsen, S., Thorvaldsen, S., & Archard, S. (2018). Teacher educators’ perceptions of working with digital technologies. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13, 177–196.
McLain, M., Irving, D., Wooff, D., & Morrison-Love, D. (2019). Humanising the design and technology curriculum: why technology education makes us human. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 24(2), 8-19.
Mears, D. (2013). Technology in Physical Education: Article #4 in a 6-Part Series: Podcasts and Wiki’s: Delivering Content Information to Students Using Technology. Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 23, 29–34.
Newell, K. (2011). Physical Education of and Through Fitness and Skill. Quest, 63, 46–54.
Niiranen, S., & Hilmola, A. (2016). Female Technology Education Teachers’ Experiences of Finnish Craft Education. Design & Technology Education: An International Journal, 21, 41-48.
O’Sullivan, G. (2010). Technology Education in New Zealand: The connected curriculum. Design and Technology Education, 15, 31-39.
Okolie-Osemene, J. (2012). Towards Utilizing New Digital Media Technologies for the Promotion of Peace Education in Nigeria. African Journal of Teacher Education, 2, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v2i1.1936
Parker, M., Graham, G., & Holt-Hale, S. (2013). Children Moving: A Reflective Approach to Teaching Physical Education. McGraw-Hill Education.
Paul, P., Bhimali, A., Kalishankar, T., Aithal, P. S., & Rajesh, R. (2018). Digital Education and Learning: The Growing Trend in Academic and Business Spaces — An International Overview. International Journal on Recent Researches in Science, Engineering & Technology, 6(5), 11-18.
Pedersen, A. Y., Nørgård, R., & Köppe, C. (2018). Patterns of Inclusion: Fostering Digital Citizenship through Hybrid Education. Educational Technology & Society, 21, 225–236.
Perlman, D., Forrest, G. J., & Pearson, P. J. (2012). Nintendo Wii: opportunities to put the education back into physical education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 1-10.
Perrotta, C. (2013). Do school-level factors influence the educational benefits of digital technology? A critical analysis of teachers’ perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 314-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01304.x
Pratama, H. C. (2012). Cyber Smart Parenting. Bandung: PT. Visi Anugranh Indonesia.
Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58, 449–458.
Putrawangsa, S., & Hasanah, U. (2018). Integrasi Teknologi Digital Dalam Pembelajaran Di Era Industri 4.0. Jurnal Tatsqif, 16, 42–54.
Rachman, I., Sulaiman, K., & Rumini, U. (2017). Pengembangan Alat Pelontar Bola Tenis Meja (Robodrill IR-2016) Untuk Latihan Drill Teknik Pukulan Drive Dan Spin. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 6(1), 50–56.
Rauscher, W. (2012). How project-based learning manifests itself in technology education textbooks. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), 18–31.
Van Ruyskensvelde, S. (2014). Towards a history of e-ducation? Exploring the possibilities of digital humanities for the history of education. Paedagogica Historica, 50(6), 861–870.
Semiz, K., & Ince, M. L. (2012). Pre-service physical education teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge, technology integration self-efficacy and instructional technology outcome expectations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1248-1275.
Sugiyono, I. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sun, H. (2012). Exergaming Impact on Physical Activity and Interest in Elementary School Children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 212–220.
Thapliyal, N. (2017). Eduresistance: a critical analysis of the role of digital media in collective struggles for public education in the USA. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16, 1–17.
Tinning, R. (2010). Pedagogy and human movement: Theory, practice, research. Theatre Topics, 22, 104-105.
Trevallion, D. (2018). The changing professional identity of pre-service technology education students. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 4, 1–15.
Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C.A., Quittre, V., gaer, E.V., & Monseur, C. (2013). The Use of ICT in Education: a survey of schools in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48, 11-27.
Wierzbicka, A. (2020). Polish philology education in the digital age. Is it still present at Polish schools and universities? Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Litteraria Polonica, 56(1), 127-141.
Williams, A., Windle, R., & Wharrad, H. (2020). How will Education 4.0 influence learning in higher education? Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 17, 1-18.
The works and papers that are published in this Journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publication Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) has the Publication Rights (Copyright) to the published papers and works, and favors and permits the reusing of the same under the license indicated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. The papers and works are to be published in the digital edition of the Journal under the license Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial-Sin Obra Derivada 3.0 España (legal text). The copying, using, spreading, transmitting and publicly displaying of the papers, works or publication are permitted as long as: i) the authors and original sources (Journal, publisher and URL of the publication) are quoted; ii) it is not used for commercial benefit; iii) the existence and specifications of this users license are mentioned.
3. Conditions of Self-Archiving. It is permitted and encouraged that the authors spread electronically the pre-print (before printing) and/or post-print (the revised, evaluated and accepted) versions of their papers or works before their publication since this favors their circulation and early diffusion and therefore can help increase their citation and quotation, and also there reach through the academic community.
The works and papers that are published in this Journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publication Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) has the Publication Rights (Copyright) to the published papers and works, and favors and permits the reusing of the same under the license indicated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. The papers and works are to be published in the digital edition of the Journal under the license Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial-Sin Obra Derivada 3.0 España (legal text). The copying, using, spreading, transmitting and publicly displaying of the papers, works or publication are permitted as long as: i) the authors and original sources (Journal, publisher and URL of the publication) are quoted; ii) it is not used for commercial benefit; iii) the existence and specifications of this users license are mentioned.
3. Conditions of Self-Archiving. It is permitted and encouraged that the authors spread electronically the pre-print (before printing) and/or post-print (the revised, evaluated and accepted) versions of their papers or works before their publication since this favors their circulation and early diffusion and therefore can help increase their citation and quotation, and also there reach through the academic community.
