The effect of Neurofeedback SMR training on psycho-physiological and behavioral phenomena in professional handball players: An exploratory study
Abstract
This study aimed on examining the effects of Sensory Motor Rhythm training (SMR-T) on various psychophysiological and behavioral phenomena in professional handball players. The study involved ten handball players, with no prior experience in neurofeedback training, four undergoing the SMR-T protocol and six serving as the control group. Using a small-N, multiple-measures design, changes in reaction time, focused attention, general and pre-competition anxiety were monitored, while interviews assessed the subjective experiences and perceptions of the protocol's effects in the experimental group. Quantitative analysis based on descriptive parameters revealed a mild tendency towards improvement in pre-competition anxiety in the control group, while much stronger tendencies for improvement were observed in the experimental group across nearly all tested parameters, specifically regarding reaction time, focused attention, general anxiety, and pre-competition anxiety. Inferential statistics, likely due to the small sample size, did not confirm statistically significant differences between groups after the intervention, except for general and pre-competition anxiety. However, moderate to strong effect sizes suggest that this method may have significant potential for impacting the outcomes measured. Qualitative findings also point to psychological benefits of SMR-T, including perceived reduction in pre-competition anxiety, enhanced focused attention, improved sleep, and other positive behavioral effects. The results suggest that SMR-T could be a valuable tool, not only for performance enhancement, but also for improving overall well-being in professional athletes.
Downloads
-
Abstract3
-
PDF4
References
1. Blumenstein, B., & Orbach, I. (2012). Biofeedback training in sea. In A. Edmonds & G. Tenenbaum (Eds.), Case studies in applied psychophysiology: Neurofeedback and biofeedback treatments for advances in human performance 134–143. Wiley-Blackwell.
2. Cheng, M.-Y., Huang, C.-J., Chang, Y.-K., Koester, D., Schack, T., & Hung, T.-M. (2015). Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback enhances golf putting performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 37(6), 626–636. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0166
3. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
4. de Brito, M. A. de, Fernandes, J. R., Esteves, N. S., Müller, V. T., Alexandria, D. B., Pérez, D. I. V., Slimani, M., Brito, C. J., Bragazzi, N. L., & Miarka, B. (2022). The effect of neurofeedback on the reaction time and cognitive performance of athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.868450
5. de Oliveira, L. A., Matos, M. V., Fernandes, I. G. S., Nascimento, D. A., & da Silva-Grigoletto, M. E. (2021). Test–retest reliability of a visual-cognitive technology (BlazePod™) to measure response time. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 20(1), 179–180. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2021.179
6. Demos, J. N. (2005). Getting started with neurofeedback. W. W. Norton & Company.
7. Domingos, C., Peralta, M., Prazeres, P., Nan, W., Rosa, A., & Pereira, J. G. (2021). Session frequency matters in neurofeedback training of athletes. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 46(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-021-09505-3
8. Enriquez-Geppert, S., Huster, R. J., Scharfenort, R., Mokom, Z. N., Zimmermann, J., & Herrmann, C. S. (2014). Modulation of frontal-midline theta by neurofeedback. Biological Psychology, 95, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.02.019
9. Faridnia, M., Shojaei, M., & Rahimi, A. (2012). The effect of neurofeedback training on the anxiety of elite female swimmers. Annals of Biological Research, 3, 1020–1028.
10. Gani, C., Birbaumer, N., & Strehl, U. (2008). Long-term effects after feedback of slow cortical potentials and of theta–beta amplitudes in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism, 10, 209–232.
11. Gong, A., Gu, F., Nan, W., Qu, Y., Jiang, C., & Fu, Y. (2021). A review of neurofeedback training for improving sport performance from the perspective of user experience. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.638369
12. Gong, A., Nan, W., Yin, E., Jiang, C., & Fu, Y. (2020). Efficacy, trainability, and neuroplasticity of SMR vs. alpha rhythm shooting performance neurofeedback training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00094
13. Graham, J. E., Karmarkar, A. M., & Ottenbacher, K. J. (2012). Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: Issues and methods. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(8), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.017
14. Gruzelier, J. H. (2014). EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. I: A review of cognitive and affective outcome in healthy participants. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.09.015
15. Hoffman, J. R. (2020). Evaluation of a reactive agility assessment device in youth football players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 34(12), 3311–3315. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003867
16. Jason, L., & Glenwick, D. (2016). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Oxford University Press.
17. Kondo, K., Noonan, K. M., Freeman, M., Ayers, C., Morasco, B. J., & Kansagara, D. (2019). Efficacy of biofeedback for medical conditions: An evidence map. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(12), 2883–2893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05215-z
18. Levy, J. J., & Baldwin, D. R. (2019). Psychophysiology and biofeedback of sport performance. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), APA handbook of sport and exercise psychology: Sport psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 745–758). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000123-037
19. Marzbani, H., Marateb, H. R., & Mansourian, M. (2016). Neurofeedback: A comprehensive review on system design, methodology and clinical applications. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 7(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.15412/J.BCN.03070208
20. Mikicin, M., Orzechowski, G., Jurewicz, K., Paluch, K., Kowalczyk, M., & Wróbel, A. (2015). Brain-training for physical performance: A study of EEG-neurofeedback and alpha relaxation training in athletes. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 75(4), 434–445. https://doi.org/10.55782/ane-2015-2047
21. Mikicin, M., Szczypinska, M., & Skwarek, K. (2018). Neurofeedback needs support! Effects of neurofeedback-EEG training in terms of the level of attention and arousal control in sports shooters. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 10(3), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.10.3.08
22. Parsaee, S., Alboghbish, S., Abdolahi, H., Alirajabi, R., & Anbari, A. (2018). Effect of a period of selected SMR/theta neurofeedback training on visual and auditory reaction time in veterans and disabled athletes. Iranian Journal of War and Public Health, 10(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijwph.10.1.15
23. Paul, M., Ganesan, S., & Sandhu, J. S. (2011). Effect of sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback on psychophysiological, electroencephalographic measures and performance of archery players. Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 4, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-489X.210753
24. Prończuk, M., Trybek, G., Terbalyan, A., Markowski, J., Pilch, J., Krzysztofik, M., Kostrzewa, M., Mostowik, A., & Maszczyk, A. (2023). The effects of EEG biofeedback training on visual reaction time in judo athletes. Journal of Human Kinetics, 89, 247–258. https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/174272
25. Rydzik, Ł., Wąsacz, W., Ambroży, T., Javdaneh, N., Brydak, K., & Kopańska, M. (2023). The use of neurofeedback in sports training: Systematic review. Brain Sciences, 13(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13040660
26. Salimnejad, Z., Zandi, H., & Arsham, S. (2019). Effect of bio-neural feedback exercises on the performance of female rugby players. Journal of Motor Control and Learning, 1(2), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijmcl.1.2.10
27. Scanlan, T. K., Babkes, M. L., & Scanlan, L. A. (2005). Participation in sport: A developmental glimpse at emotion. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 275–309). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Smith, R. E., Smoll, F. L., Cumming, S. P., & Grossbard, J. R. (2006). Measurement of multidimensional sport performance anxiety in children and adults: The Sport Anxiety Scale-2. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28(4), 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.28.4.479
29. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R. E., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state–trait anxiety inventory (Form Y1–Y2). Consulting Psychologists Press.
30. Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. M. (2000). The study of emotion in sport and exercise: Historical, definitional, and conceptual perspectives. In Y. L. Hanin (Ed.), Emotions in sport (pp. 3–37). Human Kinetics.
The works and papers that are published in this Journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publication Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) has the Publication Rights (Copyright) to the published papers and works, and favors and permits the reusing of the same under the license indicated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. The papers and works are to be published in the digital edition of the Journal under the license Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial-Sin Obra Derivada 3.0 España (legal text). The copying, using, spreading, transmitting and publicly displaying of the papers, works or publication are permitted as long as: i) the authors and original sources (Journal, publisher and URL of the publication) are quoted; ii) it is not used for commercial benefit; iii) the existence and specifications of this users license are mentioned.
3. Conditions of Self-Archiving. It is permitted and encouraged that the authors spread electronically the pre-print (before printing) and/or post-print (the revised, evaluated and accepted) versions of their papers or works before their publication since this favors their circulation and early diffusion and therefore can help increase their citation and quotation, and also there reach through the academic community.
The works and papers that are published in this Journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publication Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) has the Publication Rights (Copyright) to the published papers and works, and favors and permits the reusing of the same under the license indicated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. The papers and works are to be published in the digital edition of the Journal under the license Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial-Sin Obra Derivada 3.0 España (legal text). The copying, using, spreading, transmitting and publicly displaying of the papers, works or publication are permitted as long as: i) the authors and original sources (Journal, publisher and URL of the publication) are quoted; ii) it is not used for commercial benefit; iii) the existence and specifications of this users license are mentioned.
3. Conditions of Self-Archiving. It is permitted and encouraged that the authors spread electronically the pre-print (before printing) and/or post-print (the revised, evaluated and accepted) versions of their papers or works before their publication since this favors their circulation and early diffusion and therefore can help increase their citation and quotation, and also there reach through the academic community.
