Examining trajectories of gender equality in sport for development: A text mining analysis
Abstract
The study aimed to identify key themes in gender equality discourse within sport for development (SFD) literature, map their evolution, and assess the influence of sociopolitical contexts on gender equality approaches in SFD. The methodology involved a text-mining analysis of 526 English-language research articles on gender equality and sport development published from 2000 to 2021. The findings revealed a trajectory in the literature from an acritical stage towards more nuanced activation and liberation stages, varying across sociopolitical contexts. Key themes included the role of cultural norms, the impact of policy frameworks, and the emergence of intersectional approaches. The analysis highlighted a shift from focusing on participation rates to addressing systemic barriers and power dynamics within SFD contexts. While recent literature has developed more sophisticated analytical categories for examining gender equality in sport, there remains a gap in research exploring the role of sociopolitical agents in driving change. The study's semantic configurations align closely with international sports frameworks, suggesting a strong influence of global policy on local SFD initiatives. This research provides a comprehensive, data-driven overview of how gender equality discourses in SFD have evolved over two decades. It underscores the importance of considering sociopolitical contexts in designing and implementing SFD programs to promote gender equality.
Downloads
-
Abstract0
-
PDF0
References
1 Adriaanse, J. (2016). Gender diversity in the governance of sport associations: The Sydney Scoreboard Global Index of Participation. Journal of business ethics, 137(1), 149-160.
2 Adriaanse, J. A. (2019). The influence of gendered emotional relations on gender equality in sport governance. Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 587-603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783319842665
3 Anyiwo, N., Bañales, J., Rowley, S. J., Watkins, D. C., & Richards‐Schuster, K. (2018). Sociocultural influences on the sociopolitical development of African American youth. Child Development Perspectives, 12(3), 165-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12276
4 Beutler, I. (2008). Sport serving development and peace: Achieving the goals of the United Nations through sport. Sport in Society, 11(4), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430802019227
5 Caballero-Julia, D., & Campillo, P. (2021). Epistemological Considerations of Text Mining: Implications for Systematic Literature Review. Mathematics, 9(16), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161865
6 Carmen, S. A. S., Domínguez, M., Greene, A. C., Mendoza, E., Fine, M., Neville, H. A., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2015). Revisiting the collective in critical consciousness: Diverse sociopolitical wisdoms and ontological healing in sociopolitical development. The Urban Review, 47(5), 824-846.
7 Carr, E. S. (2003). Rethinking empowerment theory using a feminist lens: The importance of process. Affilia, 18(1), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/088610990223909
8 Chawansky, M., Hayhurst, L., McDonald, M., & van Ingen, C. (2017). Innovations in sport for development and peace research. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 2(1), 1-6.
9 Coalter, F. (2010). The politics of sport-for-development: Limited focus programmes and broad gauge problems? International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45(3), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690210366791
10 Dai, J., & Menhas, R. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals, Sports and Physical Activity: The Localization of Health-Related Sustainable Development Goals Through Sports in China: A Narrative Review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13, 1419–1430. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S257844
11 Darnell, S. C. (2012). Olympism in action, Olympic hosting and the politics of ‘Sport for Development and Peace’: Investigating the development discourses of Rio 2016. Sport in Society, 15(6), 869-887.
12 Davis, P., & Edwards, L. (2014). The new IOC and IAAF policies on female eligibility: old emperor, new clothes? Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 8(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.201.899613
13 De Souza, M. J., Williams, N. I., Nattiv, A., Joy, E., Misra, M., Loucks, A. B., & Mallinson, R. J. (2014). Misunderstanding the female athlete triad: Refuting the IOC consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S). British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(20), 1461–1465. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-093958
14 De Soysa, L., & Zipp, S. (2019). Gender equality, sport and the United Nation’s system. A historical overview of the slow pace of progress. Sport in Society, 22(11), 1783-1800.
15 Donnelly, P. (2008). Sport and human rights. Sport in Society, 11(4), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430802019326
16 Eime, R., Charity, M., Foley, B., Fowlie, J., & Reece, L. (2021). Gender inclusive sporting environments: the proportion of women in non-player roles over recent years. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 13(1), 1-8.
17 Gaston, L., Blundell, M., & Fletcher, T. (2020). Gender diversity in sport leadership: An investigation of United States of America national governing bodies of sport. Managing Sport and Leisure, 25(6), 402-417.
18 Gil-Píriz, D., Leyton-Román, M., Mesquita, S., & Jiménez-Castuera, R. (2021). Barriers to the Practice of Sport and Physical Activity from the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory. Sustainability, 13(14), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147665
19 Giulianotti, R. (2011). The sport, development and peace sector: A model of four social policy domains. Journal of Social Policy, 40(4), 757-776.
20 Goslin, A. E., & Kluka, D. A. (2014). Women and sport leadership: Perceptions of Malawi women educated in sport business leadership. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation, 36(3), 93-108.
21 Ha, N. Q., Dworkin, S. L., Martínez-Patiño, M. J., Rogol, A. D., Rosario, V., Sánchez, F. J., . . . Vilain, E. (2014). Hurdling over sex? Sport, science, and equity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(6), 1035-1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0332-0
22 Hancock, M., Lyras, A., & Ha, J. P. (2013). Sport for development programs for girls and women: A global assessment. Journal of Sport for Development, 1(1), 15-24.
23 Hylton, K., & Totten, M. (2006). Developing sport for all? Addressing inequality in sport. In K. Hylton & P. Bramham (Eds.), Sports development (pp. 51–79). Routledge.
24 International Olympic Committee. (2005). IOC consensus statement on the female athlete triad. https://www.olympic.org/Documents/Reports/EN/en_report_917.pdf
25 Kidd, B. (2008). A new social movement: Sport for development and peace. Sport in Society, 11(4), 370-380.
26 Kidd, B. (2010). Epilogue: the struggles must continue. Sport in Society, 13(1), 157-165.
27 Kidd, B., & Donnelly, P. (2000). Human rights in sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 35(2), 131-148.
28 Koca, C., Arslan, B., & Aşçı, F. H. (2011). Attitudes towards women's work roles and women managers in a sports organization: The case of Turkey. Gender, Work & Organization, 18(6), 592-612.
29 Kornbluh, M., Ozer, E. J., Allen, C. D., & Kirshner, B. (2015). Youth participatory action research as an approach to sociopolitical development and the new academic standards: Considerations for educators. The Urban Review, 47(5), 868-892.
30 Krahn, A. N. (2019). Sport policy praxis: Examining how Canadian sport policy practically advances the careers of nascent female coaches. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 27(2), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1123/wspaj.2018-0064
31 Lindsey, I., & Chapman, T. (2017). Enhancing the contribution of sport to the Sustainable Development Goals. Commonwealth Secretariat. https://www.sportanddev.org/sites/default/files/downloads/enhancing_the_contribution_of_sport_to_the_sustainable_development_goals_.pdf
32 Lindsey, I., & Darby, P. (2019). Sport and the Sustainable Development Goals: Where is the policy coherence? International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 54(7), 793-812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690217752651
33 Matthews, J. J. (2021). Political advances for women and sport in the mid-1990s. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(4), 641-659.
34 Meier, H. E., & von Uechtriz, C. (2020). The Key Role of Sport Policies for the Popularity of Women’s Sports: A Case Study on Women’s Soccer in Germany. Sociology of Sport Journal, 37(4), 328-345.
35 Mountjoy, M., Sundgot-Borgen, J. K., Burke, L. M., Ackerman, K. E., Blauwet, C., Constantini, N., Lebrun, C., Lundy, B., Melin, A. K., Meyer, N. L., Sherman, R. T., Tenforde, A. S., Klungland Torstveit, M., & Budgett, R. (2018). IOC consensus statement on relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S): 2018 update. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(11), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099193
36 Moura, E. S. (2021). “I Can’t Because I Am a Man”: Masculinity, Manhood, and Gender Equality in Sport for Development. Sociology of Sport Journal, 39(3), 1-9.
37 Nanayakkara, S. (2012). Crossing boundaries and changing identities: Empowering South Asian women through sport and physical activities. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 29(13), 1885-1906.
38 Niyonsenga, C., Shuhong, X., Yunyun, H., Yong, H., & Attipoe, S. G. (2021). The contribution of sports programs to accomplish the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in poverty reduction in Rwanda. International Journal of Physical Education Sports and Health, 8(4), 170-176.
39 Norman, L. (2010). Feeling second best: Elite women coaches’ experiences. Sociology of Sport Journal, 27(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.27.1.89
40 Ottesen, L., Skirstad, B., Pfister, G., & Habermann, U. (2010). Gender relations in Scandinavian sport organizations–a comparison of the situation and the policies in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Sport in Society, 13(4), 657-675. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430431003616423
41 Peachey, J. W. (2018). SDP and sport management. In H. Collison, S. C. Darnell, R. Giulianotti, & P. D. Howe (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport for development and peace (pp. 241–252). Routledge.
42 Pelak, C. F. (2010). Women and gender in South African soccer: A brief history. Soccer & Society, 11(1), 63-78.
43 Salazar Benítez, O. (2016). The fragility of gender equality policies in Spain. Social Sciences, 5(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5020017
44 Salido-Fernández, J. & Muñoz-Muñoz, A.M. (2021). Media Representation of Women Athletes at the Olympic Games: A Systematic Review. Apunts Educación Física y Deportes, 146, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2021/4).146.04
45 Schweinbenz, A. N. (2009). Selling Femininity: The Introduction of Women’s Rowing at the 1976 Olympic Games. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 26(5), 654–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523360902722575
46 Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
47 Thomson, A., Kennelly, M., & Toohey, K. (2020). A systematic quantitative literature review of empirical research on large-scale sport events’ social legacies. Leisure Studies, 39(6), 859-876.
48 Tjønndal, A. (2019). ‘I don’t think they realise how good we are’: Innovation, inclusion and exclusion in women’s Olympic boxing. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 54(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690217715642
49 Watts, R. J., Griffith, D. M., & Abdul-Adil, J. (1999). Sociopolitical development as an antidote for oppression—theory and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(2), 255-271.
50 Watts, R. J., & Hipolito-Delgado, C. P. (2015). Thinking ourselves to liberation?: Advancing sociopolitical action in critical consciousness. The Urban Review, 47(5), 847-867.
51 Watts, R. J., Williams, N. C., & Jagers, R. J. (2003). Sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1-2), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023091024140
52 Wicker, P., Breuer, C., & Von Hanau, T. (2012). Gender effects on organizational problems—Evidence from non-profit sports clubs in Germany. Sex Roles, 66(1), 105-116.
The works and papers that are published in this Journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publication Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) has the Publication Rights (Copyright) to the published papers and works, and favors and permits the reusing of the same under the license indicated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. The papers and works are to be published in the digital edition of the Journal under the license Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial-Sin Obra Derivada 3.0 España (legal text). The copying, using, spreading, transmitting and publicly displaying of the papers, works or publication are permitted as long as: i) the authors and original sources (Journal, publisher and URL of the publication) are quoted; ii) it is not used for commercial benefit; iii) the existence and specifications of this users license are mentioned.
3. Conditions of Self-Archiving. It is permitted and encouraged that the authors spread electronically the pre-print (before printing) and/or post-print (the revised, evaluated and accepted) versions of their papers or works before their publication since this favors their circulation and early diffusion and therefore can help increase their citation and quotation, and also there reach through the academic community.
The works and papers that are published in this Journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publication Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) has the Publication Rights (Copyright) to the published papers and works, and favors and permits the reusing of the same under the license indicated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. The papers and works are to be published in the digital edition of the Journal under the license Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial-Sin Obra Derivada 3.0 España (legal text). The copying, using, spreading, transmitting and publicly displaying of the papers, works or publication are permitted as long as: i) the authors and original sources (Journal, publisher and URL of the publication) are quoted; ii) it is not used for commercial benefit; iii) the existence and specifications of this users license are mentioned.
3. Conditions of Self-Archiving. It is permitted and encouraged that the authors spread electronically the pre-print (before printing) and/or post-print (the revised, evaluated and accepted) versions of their papers or works before their publication since this favors their circulation and early diffusion and therefore can help increase their citation and quotation, and also there reach through the academic community.
