Hybridization of pedagogical models in Physical Education: Influence of a Teaching-Learning Sequence on the acquisition of competencies in the physical capacity of strength and enjoyment in students
Abstract
Although the benefits of strength training in adolescents are well-known, this fitness component is surrounded by certain myths that difficult its introduction in the educational setting. The hybridization of pedagogical models (PM) can be a useful tool to promote healthy habits through physical education (PE) while promoting secondary school students’ enjoyment. This longitudinal and quasi-experimental study of one group aimed to analyze the effectiveness of a CrossFit Teaching-Learning Sequence (SE-A) based on the hybridization of PM in 2nd year of secondary school students on the acquisition of skills linked to strength and enjoyment. Before and after the SE-A, 57 students (23 girls) were evaluated on knowledge of strength-related myths (ad-hoc questionnaire), and students’ enjoyment during physical education (with the PACES questionnaire). The results showed significant differences with higher scores after the SE-A regarding the myths questionnaire (p<0.001; Z=4.150; g Hedges=0.870) and the enjoyment in PE (p<0.001; Z=3.834; g Hedges= 0.351). The hybridization of PM seems to have a positive influence on the recognition of myths related to the strength and enjoyment of PE students. This aspect could increase physical activity levels in the short and/or long term in this age-group.
Downloads
-
Abstract14
-
PDF (Español (España))22
References
1. Alvarez-Pitti, J., Casajús-Mallén, J. A., Leis-Trabazo, R., Lucía, A., López de Lara, D., Moreno-Aznar, L. A., & Rodríguez-Martínez, G. (2020). Exercise as medicine in chronic diseases during childhood and adolescence. Anales de Pediatría, 92(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpede.2020.01.001
2. Aznar-Ballesta, A., & Vernetta, M. (2023). Influencia de la satisfacción e importancia de la educación física en el abandono deportivo. Espiral. Cuadernos del Profesorado, 16(32), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.25115/ECP.V16I32.8604
3. Díaz-Tejerina, D., & Fernández-Río, J. (2023). El modelo pedagógico de educación física relacionado con la salud. Una revisión sistemática siguiendo las directrices PRISMA (Health-based physical education model. A systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines). Retos, 51, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v51.101068
4. Ellis, P. D. (2010). Introduction to effect sizes. En The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes. (pp. 3-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Evangelio, C., Fernández-Rio, J., Peiró-Velert, C., & González-Víllora, S. (2021). Sport Education, Cooperative Learning and Health-Based Physical Education: Another Step in Pedagogical Models’ Hybridization. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 92(9), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2021.1977739
6. Faigenbaum, A., MacDonald, J. P., Stracciolini, A., & Rebullido, T. R. (2020). Making a strong case for prioritizing muscular fitness in youth physical activity guidelines. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 19(12), 530-536. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000000784
7. Faigenbaum, A., Ratamess, N. A., Kang, J., Bush, J. A., & Rial Rebullido, T. (2023). May the Force Be with Youth: Foundational Strength for Lifelong Development. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 22(12), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000001122
8. Faigenbaum, A., Stracciolini, A., MacDonald, J. P., & Rial Rebullido, T. (2022). Mythology of youth resistance training. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 56(17), 997-998. https://doi.org/10.1136/BJSPORTS-2022-105804
9. Fernandez-Rio, J. (2014). Another Step in Models-based Practice: Hybridizing Cooperative Learning and Teaching for Personal and Social Responsibility. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 85(7), 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2014.937158
10. Fernández-Río, J. (2016). El Ciclo del Aprendizaje Cooperativo: una guía para implementar de manera efectiva el aprendizaje cooperativo en educación física. Retos, (32), 264-269. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i32.51298
11. Gómez-Mármol, A. (2013). Relación entre la autopercepción de la imagen corporal y las clases de educación física, según su nivel de intensidad y diversión, en alumnos de educación. Motricidad. European Journal of Human Movement, 31, 99-109.
12. Guan, J., Xiang, P., Land, W. M., & Hamilton, X. D. (2023). The Roles of Perceived Physical Education Competence, Enjoyment, and Persistence on Middle School Students’ Physical Activity Engagement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 130(4), 1781–1796. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125231178341
13. Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M., & Bull, F. C. (2020). Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1•6 million participants. The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health, 4(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2
14. Hallal, P. C., Victora, C. G., Azevedo, M. R., & Wells, J. C. K. (2006). Adolescent Physical Activity and Health. Sports Medicine, 36(12), 1019-1030. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200636120-00003
15. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution Theory for Glass’s Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986006002107
16. Heinrich, K. M., Beattie, C. M., Crawford, D. A., Stoepker, P., & George, J. (2023). Non-Traditional Physical Education Classes Improve High School Students’ Movement Competency and Fitness: A Mixed-Methods Program Evaluation Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105914
17. Howie, E. K., McVeigh, J. A., Smith, A. J., Zabatiero, J., Bucks, R. S., Mori, T. A., … Straker, L. M. (2020). Physical activity trajectories from childhood to late adolescence and their implications for health in young adulthood. Preventive Medicine, 139, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106224
18. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Aprender juntos y solos. Aprendizaje cooperativo, competitivo e individualista. Buenos Aires: Aique.
19. Julián-Clemente, J. A., Peiró-Velert, C., Zaragoza-Casterad, J., & Aibar-Solana, A. (2021). Educación Física relacionada con la Salud. En A. Pérez-Pueyo, D. Hortigüela-Alcalá, & J. Fernández-Río (Eds.), Modelos pedagógicos en Educación Física: Qué, cómo, por qué y para qué (pp. 178-226). Universidad de León.
20. Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la L. O. 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. (2020). Boletín Oficial del Estado, 340, de 29 de diciembre de 2020. Recuperado de https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/2020/12/29/3
21. Méheut, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Teaching–learning sequences: aims and tools for science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 515-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690310001614762
22. Metzler, M. (2017). Instructional models in physical education (3rd edition). New York: Taylor & Francis.
23. Moreno, J.-A., González-Cutre, D., Martínez, C., Alonso, N., & López, M. (2008). Propiedades psicométricas de la Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) en el contexto español. Estudios de Psicología, 29(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093908784485093
24. Motl, R. W., Dishman, R. K., Saunders, R., Dowda, M., Felton, G., & Pate, R. R. (2001). Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 21(2), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00326-9
25. Ortega, F. B., Ruiz, J. R., Castillo, M. J., & Sjöström, M. (2008). Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. International Journal of Obesity, 32(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803774
26. Peterson, M. D., Gordon, P. M., Smeding, S., & Visich, P. (2018). Grip Strength Is Associated with Longitudinal Health Maintenance and Improvement in Adolescents. The Journal of Pediatrics, 202, 226-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.020
27. Sánchez-Silva, Á., & Lamoneda-Prieto, J. (2021). Hibridación de la Gamificación, la educación física relacionada con la salud y el Modelo Integral de Transición Activa hacia la Autonomía en la iniciación al Crossfit en estudiantes de Secundaria. Retos, 42, 627-635. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.87274
28. Sibley, B. A. (2012). Using Sport Education to Implement a CrossFit Unit. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 83(8), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2012.10598829
29. Veiga, O. L., Valcarce-Torrente, M., & Romero-Caballero, A. (2021). Encuesta Nacional de Tendencias de Fitness en España para 2022. Retos, 44, 625-635. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v44i0.91036
30. Velázquez-Callado, C. (2018). El aprendizaje cooperativo en educación física: Planteamientos teóricos y puesta en práctica. Acciónmotriz, 20, 7-16. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6435704
31. Zach, S., Shoval, E., & Shulruf, B. (2023). Cooperative learning in physical education lessons - literature review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1273423
The works and papers that are published in this Journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publication Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) has the Publication Rights (Copyright) to the published papers and works, and favors and permits the reusing of the same under the license indicated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. The papers and works are to be published in the digital edition of the Journal under the license Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial-Sin Obra Derivada 3.0 España (legal text). The copying, using, spreading, transmitting and publicly displaying of the papers, works or publication are permitted as long as: i) the authors and original sources (Journal, publisher and URL of the publication) are quoted; ii) it is not used for commercial benefit; iii) the existence and specifications of this users license are mentioned.
3. Conditions of Self-Archiving. It is permitted and encouraged that the authors spread electronically the pre-print (before printing) and/or post-print (the revised, evaluated and accepted) versions of their papers or works before their publication since this favors their circulation and early diffusion and therefore can help increase their citation and quotation, and also there reach through the academic community.
The works and papers that are published in this Journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publication Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) has the Publication Rights (Copyright) to the published papers and works, and favors and permits the reusing of the same under the license indicated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. The papers and works are to be published in the digital edition of the Journal under the license Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No Comercial-Sin Obra Derivada 3.0 España (legal text). The copying, using, spreading, transmitting and publicly displaying of the papers, works or publication are permitted as long as: i) the authors and original sources (Journal, publisher and URL of the publication) are quoted; ii) it is not used for commercial benefit; iii) the existence and specifications of this users license are mentioned.
3. Conditions of Self-Archiving. It is permitted and encouraged that the authors spread electronically the pre-print (before printing) and/or post-print (the revised, evaluated and accepted) versions of their papers or works before their publication since this favors their circulation and early diffusion and therefore can help increase their citation and quotation, and also there reach through the academic community.
